發(fā)布時間：2018-04-25 17:40

  本文選題：房地產(chǎn)上市公司 + 負債期限結構�。� 參考：《廣西師范大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,房地產(chǎn)業(yè)迅猛發(fā)展,已經(jīng)成為國民經(jīng)濟的支柱產(chǎn)業(yè),與許多行業(yè)關系密切,高杠桿,高風險的財務運作模式引起了社會的廣泛關注。由于我國金融市場體制發(fā)展不完善,融資方式單一,造成大部分房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)依靠大量負債經(jīng)營,債券市場發(fā)展的滯后性,造成負債過度依賴銀行的貸款。融資方式的單一性無形中放大了房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)的財務風險。房地產(chǎn)業(yè)作為國民經(jīng)濟的支柱產(chǎn)業(yè),關系到社會每一個人的利益,由于具有高度的關聯(lián)性,深入研究分析該行業(yè)的債務籌資結構,找出影響負債結構的關鍵因素,尋找優(yōu)化現(xiàn)階段我國房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)負債結構的方法,并通過調(diào)整債務結構,降低房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)的財務風險,不僅對房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)自身有著重要的現(xiàn)實意義,對與其相關聯(lián)的債權人、政策制定者等利益相關者也同樣具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。 MM理論的提出,標志著現(xiàn)代資本結構理論研究的開始。隨著研究的深入,學者們由僅僅關注負債與權益的配比過渡到研究負債內(nèi)部結構的調(diào)整,越來越多中外學者開始重視研究負債的期限結構,并提出了代理成本理論、信號傳遞理論和期限匹配理論。隨著計量經(jīng)濟學被廣泛應用于經(jīng)濟研究領域,這些理論在90年度后逐步被西方學者的實證檢驗所證實,但是由于中國對負債期限結構的研究起步較晚,加上國內(nèi)經(jīng)濟市場狀況異于西方的成熟市場,盲目套用西方現(xiàn)有理論可能得出錯誤的結論,因此有必要結合國內(nèi)自身經(jīng)濟狀況對負債期限結構進行研究。 負債期限結構的決策不但影響公司自身財務風險、融資成本,而且涉及到債權人的利益。作為國民經(jīng)濟發(fā)展重要行業(yè)的房地產(chǎn)業(yè),不合理的債務匹配將導致較高的流動性風險,進而提高作為房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)主要債權人——銀行業(yè)的經(jīng)營風險,銀行業(yè)又與其他行業(yè)關系密切,可謂是牽一發(fā)而動全身。因此研究房地產(chǎn)上市公司負債期限結構的現(xiàn)狀和影響因素,進而提出合理對策,引導房地產(chǎn)上市公司選擇合理的負債期限結構就變得非常重要了。 本文首先對國內(nèi)外有關負債期限結構的的理論和文獻進行綜述,回顧國外負債期限結構相關的經(jīng)典理論和實證研究現(xiàn)狀,包括代理成本理論、信號傳遞理論和期限匹配理論,介紹國內(nèi)外對負債期限結構影響因素的實證研究現(xiàn)狀,在吸取前人研究成果的基礎上,評價國內(nèi)學者對負債期限結構研究的不足之處；其次分析現(xiàn)階段我國房地產(chǎn)上市公司的負債融資方式和負債期限結構現(xiàn)狀,從整體上把握房地產(chǎn)上市公司負債期限結構的特點,對房地產(chǎn)上市公司負債期限結構時間序列的變換情況進行分析并簡要解釋可能的原因：再次,對可能影響房地產(chǎn)上市公司負債期限結構的因素進行理論分析并提出研究假設,選取2006-2010年在滬深A股上市的房地產(chǎn)公司作為研究樣本,通過構建非平衡面板計量模型對所選樣本公司的負債期限結構影響因素進行實證研究和分析。采用描述性統(tǒng)計和構建面板數(shù)據(jù)多元回歸模型來檢驗提出的理論假設,面板數(shù)據(jù)模型經(jīng)冗余固定效應檢驗和豪斯曼檢驗后選擇個體固定效應模型作為最佳的面板數(shù)據(jù)模型,在檢驗確定不存在多重共線、異方差和序列相關以及剔除不顯著變量后得出最終的回歸結果。實證結果表明,公司規(guī)模、成長機會、股權集中度、盈利能力、資本充足率、流動性狀況、周轉能力和資產(chǎn)期限這八個因素與房地產(chǎn)上市公司負債期限結構有顯著關系,而董事長變更未得到驗證。資本充足率、資產(chǎn)期限、流動性狀況、股權集中度對負債期限結構影響較大,公司規(guī)模、成長性、周轉能力和盈利能力對負債期限結構的影響較小。實證結果也證實了代理成本理論、信號傳遞理論和期限匹配理論,說明這些理論在解釋我國房地產(chǎn)上市公司負債期限結構時同樣適用。最后,本文對實證分析結果進行歸納總結,進而針對我國房地產(chǎn)上市公司負債期限結構存在的問題提出政策建議,并對研究的不足之處進行分析。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the real estate industry has developed rapidly and has become the pillar industry of the national economy. It is closely related to many industries. The high leverage and high risk financial operation mode has aroused wide attention of the society. Because of the imperfect development of the financial market system and the single financing mode, most real estate enterprises rely on a large amount of debt management and debt. The lag of the development of the coupon market causes the debt to overrely on the loan of the bank. The single nature of the financing mode has greatly enlarged the financial risk of the real estate enterprises. As the pillar industry of the national economy, the real estate industry is related to the interests of every one of the society, and the debt financing of the industry is deeply studied and analyzed because of its high connection. Structure, find out the key factors that affect the debt structure, look for the method to optimize the current stage of the debt structure of our real estate enterprises, and reduce the financial risk of the real estate enterprises by adjusting the debt structure, not only to the real estate enterprise itself, but also to the related creditors, policy makers and other stakeholders. It is also of great practical significance.
The introduction of MM theory marks the beginning of the research on the theory of modern capital structure. With the deepening of the research, scholars have changed from the ratio of debt to equity to the adjustment of internal structure of debt. More and more scholars and Chinese and foreign scholars began to pay attention to the term structure of debt, and put forward the theory of agency cost, the theory of signal transmission and the period. With the extensive application of econometrics in the field of economic research, these theories have been confirmed by western scholars' empirical tests after 90. However, because of the late start of the study of debt maturity structure in China, and the domestic economic market situation is different from the western mature market, it is possible to blindly apply the existing western theories. It is necessary to draw a wrong conclusion, so it is necessary to study the term structure of debt with domestic economic conditions.
The decision of debt maturity structure not only affects the company's own financial risk, the cost of financing, but also involves the interests of the creditor. As an important industry of the national economy, the irrational matching of debt will lead to higher liquidity risk, and then improve the management risk of the main creditor of the real estate enterprise, the banking industry. As the banking industry is closely related to other industries, it can be described as a whole body. Therefore, it is not often important to study the current situation and influence factors of the debt maturity structure of the listed real estate companies, and then put forward a reasonable countermeasure to guide the real estate listed companies to choose a reasonable debt maturity structure.
This paper first reviews the theory and literature of debt maturity structure at home and abroad, reviews the classical theories and empirical studies of foreign debt maturity structure, including the theory of agency cost, the theory of signal transmission and the theory of term matching, and introduces the status of the empirical research on the factors affecting the limit structure of debt period at home and abroad. On the basis of previous research results, we evaluate the shortcomings of the domestic scholars on the study of debt maturity structure; secondly, analyze the current situation of debt financing and debt maturity structure of listed real estate companies in China, grasp the characteristics of the debt maturity structure of the listed real estate companies and the debt maturity period of the listed real estate companies. The transformation of time series is analyzed and the possible reasons are briefly explained: again, the factors that may affect the debt maturity structure of the real estate listed companies are analyzed and the research hypothesis is put forward, and the 2006-2010 year Real Estate Company listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock market are selected as the research sample, and the non balanced panel measurement model is constructed. Empirical research and analysis are carried out on the influence factors of the term structure of the liabilities of the selected Sample Firms. The descriptive statistics and the construction of panel data multiple regression model are used to test the proposed theoretical hypothesis. The panel data model is selected as the best panel data model after the redundant fixed effect test and Houseman test. The results show that the eight factors of company size, growth opportunity, equity concentration, profitability, capital adequacy, liquidity, turnover capacity and asset maturity are negative to the real estate listed companies. The term structure of debt has a significant relationship, while the chairman's change has not been verified. Capital adequacy, asset maturity, liquidity, ownership concentration have a greater impact on debt maturity structure, company size, growth, turnover ability and profitability have little effect on debt maturity structure. Empirical results also confirm the agency cost theory, signal transmission The theory of recursion and term matching shows that these theories are equally applicable in explaining the debt maturity structure of the listed real estate companies in our country. Finally, this paper sums up the results of the empirical analysis, and then puts forward some policy suggestions on the existing problems of the debt maturity structure of the listed real estate companies in China, and divides the research inadequacies into some points. Analysis.

【學位授予單位】：廣西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F275;F299.233.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王剛;秦捷;;公司債務期限結構影響因素的實證分析[J];財會通訊(學術版);2006年12期

2 王霞;袁衛(wèi)秋;盧慧芳;;關于債務期限結構影響因素之研究——來自滬深股市上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];財會通訊(學術版);2008年02期

3 楊興全;梅波;;公司治理機制對債務期限結構的影響——來自我國上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];財貿(mào)研究;2008年01期

4 肖作平;廖理;;公司治理影響債務期限水平嗎?——來自中國上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];管理世界;2008年11期

5 胡援成;劉明艷;;中國上市公司債務期限結構影響因素:面板數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];管理世界;2011年02期

6 楊興全;宋惠敏;;我國上市公司債務期限結構影響因素的實證研究[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;2006年01期

7 肖作平;對我國上市公司債務期限結構影響因素的分析[J];經(jīng)濟科學;2005年03期

8 周孝坤;;上市公司債務期限結構影響因素實證研究[J];上海金融;2006年11期

9 向銳;;董事會特征與公司債務期限選擇——基于中國民營上市公司面板數(shù)據(jù)的研究[J];山西財經(jīng)大學學報;2009年03期

10 武曉玲;翟琦;;公司治理結構對債務期限結構影響的實證研究[J];山西財經(jīng)大學學報;2011年11期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 李淑娟;中國企業(yè)債務融資結構研究[D];蘇州大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1802318