本文選題：投資信托 + 受托人　； 參考：《上海大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：投資信托起源并發(fā)展于英美法系國家，并一直廣泛應(yīng)用于社會(huì)生活的各個(gè)領(lǐng)域之中，信托的投資功能將社會(huì)上分散的資金集合起來，為現(xiàn)代金融業(yè)的發(fā)展提供了強(qiáng)有力的支柱，也正因?yàn)槿绱�，投資信托模式為世界各國所效仿。在投資信托業(yè)比較發(fā)達(dá)的國家，除了有信托法的規(guī)定過外，，還有關(guān)于信托業(yè)的其他配套法律規(guī)定，而我國并沒有規(guī)范健全的信托法律規(guī)定，信托法制基礎(chǔ)十分薄弱，受托人總是游走在法律的邊緣，受托人控制信托財(cái)產(chǎn)的運(yùn)營與管理，投資者難以對(duì)受托人的管理行為進(jìn)行控制，使得投資信托變成一種高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的行業(yè)，受托人偏離投資者利益的行為在所有權(quán)與控制權(quán)極度分離的投資信托運(yùn)作過程中更容易產(chǎn)生，從而損害投資者的利益。 遂本文擬以投資信托受托人的忠實(shí)義務(wù)為研宄對(duì)象，對(duì)投資信托的興起帶動(dòng)了受托人忠實(shí)義務(wù)的變化、投資信托受托人忠實(shí)義務(wù)的理論基礎(chǔ)及其與相關(guān)義務(wù)的比較、當(dāng)代中國投資信托對(duì)受托人忠實(shí)義務(wù)的要求、投資信托受托人違反忠實(shí)義務(wù)的賠償責(zé)任分析、完善我國投資信托受托人忠實(shí)義務(wù)的法律構(gòu)想進(jìn)行了研宄。試圖在投資信托模式下探討適合其發(fā)展的受托人的忠實(shí)義務(wù)。
[Abstract]:The investment trust originated and developed in the common law countries, and has been widely used in various fields of social life. The investment function of the trust gathers the scattered funds in the society and provides a strong support for the development of the modern financial industry. Because of this, the investment trust model has been emulated by countries all over the world. In countries where the investment trust industry is relatively developed, in addition to the provisions of the Trust Law, there are other supporting legal provisions on the trust industry. However, there is no standard and sound trust law in our country, and the legal basis of trust is very weak. The trustee is always on the edge of the law. The trustee controls the operation and management of the trust property, and it is difficult for investors to control the trustee's management behavior, which makes the investment trust become a high-risk industry. The behavior of the trustee deviating from the interests of the investor is more likely to occur in the process of the operation of the investment trust in which ownership and control are separated so as to harm the interests of the investor. Therefore, this paper intends to study the fiduciary duty of the investment trust trustee, the rise of the investment trust brings the change of the fiduciary duty, the theoretical basis of the fiduciary duty of investment trust and the comparison between the fiduciary duty and the related obligation. The requirement of the fiduciary duty of the investment trust in contemporary China, the liability analysis of the fiduciary breach of the fiduciary duty, and the perfection of the legal conception of the fiduciary duty of the investment trust in our country have been studied. This paper tries to probe into the fiduciary duty suitable for its development under the investment trust mode.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.282

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉正峰;信托制度基礎(chǔ)之比較與受托人義務(wù)立法[J];比較法研究;2004年03期

2 吳一鳴;論我國信托的法律適用——兼評(píng)我國《信托法》第3條[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年02期

3 查志剛;信托財(cái)產(chǎn)性質(zhì)的比較分析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年10期

4 劉正鋒;美國信托法受托人謹(jǐn)慎義務(wù)研究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年09期

5 黃人杰;對(duì)受托人信托投資義務(wù)的若干思考[J];國際商務(wù).對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

6 鄭京水;晚近英美信托法受托人制度的三維構(gòu)造——兼評(píng)我國信托法相關(guān)規(guī)定之完善[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

7 李群星;論信托財(cái)產(chǎn)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年01期

8 余能斌,文杰;我國《信托法》內(nèi)容缺陷管窺與補(bǔ)正思考[J];法學(xué);2002年09期

9 王連洲;中國信托制度發(fā)展的困境與出路[J];法學(xué);2005年01期

10 麻廣;翁盈超;;中外信托法中受托人義務(wù)比較考察[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

本文編號(hào)：1790012