本文選題：失票 + 失票案件�。� 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：票據(jù)作為一種具有匯兌功能、支付功能、信用功能和融資功能的金融工具的出現(xiàn)，完全符合商品經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的總趨勢。作為為大眾所接受的金融工具，票據(jù)在如今的金融生活中已經(jīng)成為不可或缺的重要部分。但是，由于我國現(xiàn)階段經(jīng)濟條件的限制，銀行票據(jù)電子化無法在全國范圍內(nèi)完全實施，故而票據(jù)流通過程中還是以紙質(zhì)票據(jù)為主。而紙質(zhì)票據(jù)在票據(jù)流通過程中由于被盜、被搶，或者票據(jù)丟失，票據(jù)毀損等失票情況時有發(fā)生。 票據(jù)法作為商法中極為重要的部門法，是維持商事良好運作的重要法律支柱之一。票據(jù)法的制定目的，是為了規(guī)范各種票據(jù)行為，保證票據(jù)順利流通。失票情況的發(fā)生，導(dǎo)致票據(jù)流轉(zhuǎn)中各方當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利義務(wù)發(fā)生變化，同時也可能使票據(jù)流轉(zhuǎn)過程發(fā)生停頓。各國票據(jù)法均規(guī)定了失票救濟制度。但是，筆者在實踐中接觸大量票據(jù)失票案件后發(fā)現(xiàn)，失票救濟制度并不能很好的保障票據(jù)權(quán)利人的票據(jù)權(quán)利或者票據(jù)法上的非票據(jù)權(quán)利；相反，由于失票案件涉及的當(dāng)事人通常為多重身份，且票據(jù)法律原則規(guī)定模糊不清，不同法律規(guī)定之間相互矛盾，導(dǎo)致此類失票案件的處理逐漸成為司法實踐中票據(jù)糾紛的難點。筆者在查閱相關(guān)資料后發(fā)現(xiàn)，專門針對失票案件的司法實踐研究并不多，而在現(xiàn)實中，此類案件恰恰是法院審理案件中的高難案件，其判決結(jié)果往往最具爭議。 故此，筆者選擇從失票這個特殊角度入手，通過查閱全國范圍內(nèi)各級法院審理的大量相關(guān)案件的審理內(nèi)容和判決結(jié)果，，從司法實踐的角度，在比較法的基礎(chǔ)上，總結(jié)了有代表性的失票案例，并通過對失票案例的爭議焦點進行詳細(xì)分析比對，發(fā)現(xiàn)造成我國《票據(jù)法》以及相關(guān)票據(jù)法律規(guī)范體系下此類失票案件判決結(jié)果不一的原因，并對各個原因進行深層次的理論挖掘。 經(jīng)過研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，失票案件在司法實務(wù)中無論是從審理內(nèi)容、判決理由還是結(jié)果均亂象紛呈的主要原因是由于其一：在我國票據(jù)法上，關(guān)于票據(jù)無因性原則并不明確；其二：票據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)讓方式的類型以及產(chǎn)生的效力并不確定；其三：失票各方當(dāng)事人的舉證責(zé)任規(guī)定不明確。本文在根據(jù)所述原因進行針對性的理論分析基礎(chǔ)上，對于我國票據(jù)立法的不完善，提出切實可行的修改建議，以推動我國票據(jù)法改革。 本文由四部分構(gòu)成。 第一章為緒論，簡單敘述票據(jù)失票案件研究的緣起、意義，研究對象和范圍，以及研究思路和研究特色。 第二章從精選的五個票據(jù)失票案件典型案例入手，通過比較分析，說明票據(jù)失票案件在司法實踐中審理內(nèi)容、判決理由、和判決結(jié)果混亂不堪的原因以及由此原因造成的司法實踐影響。 第三章從理論上對于導(dǎo)致票據(jù)失票案件實務(wù)操作中裁判混亂的原因進行比較，分析，研究，指出立法完善的方向。 第四章結(jié)合我國目前的實際情況，通過對失票案件的研究，對如何完善票據(jù)立法，提出切實可行的合理化建議。
[Abstract]:As a financial instrument with exchange function , payment function , credit function and financing function , the paper is fully in line with the general trend of commodity economy development . As a financial instrument accepted by the public , the paper is an indispensable part in the financial life nowadays . However , because of the limitation of the current economic conditions in China , the electronic bill of the bank cannot be fully implemented in the whole country .

As a very important department law in commercial law , the negotiable instrument law is one of the important legal pillars to maintain the good operation of the business . The purpose of the bill is to regulate various kinds of negotiable instruments and guarantee the smooth circulation of the negotiable instruments .
On the contrary , because the parties involved in the case of missing tickets are usually multiple identities , and the legal principles of negotiable instruments are vague and different legal provisions are contradictory , the handling of such non - ticket cases has gradually become a difficult point in judicial practice .

From the point of view of judicial practice , the author summarizes the typical case of missing tickets from the point of view of judicial practice , and makes a detailed analysis of the dispute focus of the case of missing tickets .

It is found that in the practice of judicial practice , the main reason why the case of missing tickets is in judicial practice , whether from the trial content , the judgment reason or the result , is due to the fact that , in our country ' s negotiable instruments law , the principle of non - compliance of the bill is not clear ;
Second , the type of bill transfer and its effectiveness are uncertain ;
Thirdly , it is not clear that the burden of proof of the parties concerned is not clear . On the basis of the theoretical analysis of the reasons , this paper puts forward practical suggestions to amend the bill legislation of our country to promote the reform of China ' s ticket law .

This paper consists of four parts .

The first chapter is the introduction , briefly describes the origin , significance , research object and scope of the case study of ticket loss , as well as the research thinking and research characteristics .

The second chapter starts with the typical case of five cases of missing tickets , and compares the reasons of the case of ticket failure in judicial practice , the reasons for the judgment and the confusion of the result of judgment and the effect of judicial practice caused by the causes .

The third chapter compares , analyzes and studies the causes of the confusion in the practical operation of the ticket - losing case , and points out the direction of the perfection of the legislation .

In the fourth chapter , according to the current situation in our country , through the study of the case of missing tickets , how to perfect the bill legislation and put forward feasible rationalization proposals .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.287

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 陳柳裕;;論票據(jù)的轉(zhuǎn)讓方式[J];福建法學(xué);2000年01期

2 王國征;;民事證明責(zé)任中的羅森貝克規(guī)范說述評[J];山東社會科學(xué);2008年05期

本文編號：1778731