本文關(guān)鍵詞： 票據(jù)保證 生效要件 從屬性 獨(dú)立性 抗辯權(quán)　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：保證在民事法律關(guān)系中存在已久，并且發(fā)揮著增強(qiáng)信用、促進(jìn)流通的重要職能。民法上的保證也可用來(lái)?yè)?dān)保票據(jù)債務(wù)的履行，但由于票據(jù)文義性與流通性的特點(diǎn)，這樣的方式不是很方便。為了適應(yīng)票據(jù)的特點(diǎn)，我國(guó)票據(jù)法為票據(jù)債務(wù)的履行提供了票據(jù)的保證制度，被稱為票據(jù)法上的保證，簡(jiǎn)稱票據(jù)保證。票據(jù)保證制度，如今已是國(guó)際上通行的一項(xiàng)重要的票據(jù)制度。設(shè)立這項(xiàng)制度的目的就在于為票據(jù)債務(wù)的履行提供擔(dān)保，從而保障票據(jù)債權(quán)人的利益,并降低票據(jù)交易的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、增強(qiáng)票據(jù)流通的信用，最終促進(jìn)票據(jù)的使用和流通。因此，研究票據(jù)保證制度具有非常重要的意義。但筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)，目前我國(guó)票據(jù)法理論界對(duì)票據(jù)保證制度的研究，尤其是無(wú)效的票據(jù)保證這一塊尚存在研究上的真空地帶。因此，本論文的選題價(jià)值就源于此。 本文采取比較、分析的方法，以民法上的保證制度和票據(jù)行為的基本理論為基礎(chǔ)，結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外立法實(shí)踐同我國(guó)現(xiàn)行票據(jù)法立法之比較，選取“無(wú)效的票據(jù)保證”這一視角來(lái)深入探究票據(jù)保證制度，并從票據(jù)保證的生效要件入手，以票據(jù)保證的從屬性和獨(dú)立性此雙重屬性為主線，對(duì)票據(jù)保證的無(wú)效情形以及票據(jù)保證無(wú)效后票據(jù)保證人的權(quán)與責(zé)等進(jìn)行探討，并以此反思我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的票據(jù)保證制度，，希望尋得既切合我國(guó)發(fā)展實(shí)際又符合當(dāng)今國(guó)際發(fā)展趨勢(shì)的完善之策，筆者也更希望能夠通過(guò)自己的一些拙見(jiàn)對(duì)于解決我國(guó)當(dāng)前票據(jù)法領(lǐng)域的司法實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題貢獻(xiàn)微薄之力。 圍繞這一目的，本文分為四個(gè)章節(jié)展開(kāi)分析與論述： 一票據(jù)保證的成立。本部分主要介紹了票據(jù)保證成立的生效要件，并分成形式要件和實(shí)質(zhì)要件來(lái)詳細(xì)論述，還介紹了兩種實(shí)務(wù)中常見(jiàn)的特殊保證，并分析了兩種特殊保證的效力，為下面論述無(wú)效的票據(jù)保證的情形做鋪墊。 二影響票據(jù)保證的效力的因素。該部分論述了票據(jù)保證的兩大屬性各自對(duì)票據(jù)保證效力的影響，由于票據(jù)保證的從屬性和獨(dú)立性是研究整個(gè)票據(jù)保證制度的基礎(chǔ)，也是展開(kāi)全篇論述、分析問(wèn)題的基本要求，唯此才既能滿足民事交往、商貿(mào)流通對(duì)于交易安全、交易信用的追求，又能夠在政策法規(guī)上顯示出對(duì)于票據(jù)債務(wù)債務(wù)人權(quán)益的保護(hù)。 三無(wú)效的票據(jù)保證的情形。根據(jù)前兩部分詳細(xì)論述，為此部分論述無(wú)效的票據(jù)保證情形提供了清晰的思路，針對(duì)有效的票據(jù)保證可以很容易的推出無(wú)效的情形。 四票據(jù)保證無(wú)效的法律后果。票據(jù)保證無(wú)效后當(dāng)然會(huì)產(chǎn)生相應(yīng)的法律后果，此部分就從票據(jù)保證人責(zé)任的義務(wù)和保證人的抗辯權(quán)這兩個(gè)角度來(lái)論述票據(jù)保證無(wú)效后的法律后果問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:The guarantee has existed in the civil legal relationship for a long time, and plays an important role in strengthening credit and promoting circulation. The guarantee in civil law can also be used to guarantee the performance of the debt of negotiable instruments, but due to the characteristics of the meaning and circulation of the instruments, This method is not very convenient. In order to adapt to the characteristics of the bill, our country's negotiable instrument law provides the negotiable instrument guarantee system for the performance of the bill debt, which is called the negotiable instrument law guarantee. It is now an important international instrument system established to guarantee the performance of the debt of the instrument, thereby safeguarding the interests of the creditors of the instrument and reducing the risk of the transaction of the instrument. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the negotiable instrument guarantee system. However, the author finds that the current research on the bill guarantee system in the theoretical circle of negotiable instrument law in our country is very important. In particular, the void bill guarantee is still a vacuum in the research. Therefore, the value of this thesis is derived from this. This article adopts the method of comparison and analysis, based on the basic theory of civil law guarantee system and bill behavior, and combines the domestic and foreign legislative practice with the current legislation of negotiable instrument law of our country. From the perspective of "invalid negotiable instrument guarantee", this paper probes deeply into the bill guarantee system, starting with the effective requirements of the bill guarantee, taking the dual attribute of the bill guarantee as the main line, that is, the subordinate attribute and the independence of the bill guarantee. This paper probes into the invalid situation of negotiable instrument guarantee and the rights and responsibilities of the guarantor of bill after the invalidation of bill guarantee, so as to reflect on the present bill guarantee system in our country. I hope to find a perfect strategy which is in line with the actual development of our country as well as the current international development trend. The author also hopes to make a modest contribution to the solution of the judicial practice problems in the field of current negotiable instrument law through some of my own humble opinions. Around this purpose, this paper is divided into four chapters to analyze and discuss:. This part mainly introduces the effective requirements of the establishment of negotiable instrument guarantee, and discusses it in detail into formal and substantive elements, and also introduces two kinds of common special guarantees in practice. It also analyzes the validity of two special warranties, which lays the groundwork for the situation of invalid negotiable instruments guarantee. This part discusses the influence of the two properties of the negotiable instrument guarantee on the validity of the bill guarantee, because the subordinate attribute and the independence of the bill guarantee are the basis of the study of the whole bill guarantee system. This is the only way to meet the needs of civil communication, the pursuit of trade security and trading credit, and the protection of the rights and interests of the debtor of bill debt in terms of policies and regulations. According to the first two parts of the detailed discussion, this part discusses the invalid bill guarantee situation to provide a clear idea, for the effective bill guarantee can be very easy to launch invalid situation. (4) the legal consequences of the invalidation of a negotiable instrument guarantee. Of course, if the bill guarantee is invalid, it will have corresponding legal consequences. This part discusses the legal consequences of the invalidation of negotiable instrument guarantee from the point of view of the obligation of the guarantor and the right of defense of the guarantor.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.287

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董士忠;商主體與民事主體法律特征的差異[J];安陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

2 孫衛(wèi)國(guó);票據(jù)保證的從屬性與獨(dú)立性[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2000年05期

3 林艷琴;;中外票據(jù)保證制度之立法比較[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年03期

4 謝石松;論票據(jù)的保證[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1996年04期

5 史正保;;試析中外票據(jù)保證制度之差異[J];甘肅省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

6 李衛(wèi);票據(jù)保證與民事保證[J];河北法學(xué);1995年06期

7 楊秋華;票據(jù)保證若干問(wèn)題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2000年01期

8 趙新華;論票據(jù)保證及其效力[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1996年04期

9 董惠江;票據(jù)抗辯的分類[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年01期

10 殷成潔;;論票據(jù)保證的特征與效力[J];連云港職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2006年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 馬海冰;票據(jù)保證制度研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2011年

2 何志紅;票據(jù)保證制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年

3 楊林;票據(jù)保證若干問(wèn)題研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

4 王蕊;無(wú)效保證的法律責(zé)任問(wèn)題研究[D];上海海事大學(xué);2005年

5 朱

本文編號(hào)：1527033