本文關(guān)鍵詞： 養(yǎng)老金 信托 法律制度 監(jiān)管　出處：《安徽大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在社會保障制度體系中,養(yǎng)老金制度最具代表性,是整個社會保障制度的核心和基礎(chǔ)。養(yǎng)老金增值保值關(guān)乎社會的和諧穩(wěn)定,是國家建設(shè)發(fā)展水平和人民幸福安康的重要標(biāo)志。作為老百姓的“養(yǎng)命錢”,保證養(yǎng)老金投資的安全性和收益性同樣至關(guān)重要。養(yǎng)老金信托不僅具有養(yǎng)老保障、不可隨意撤銷等特征,兼有民事信托和商事信托的性質(zhì)�？v觀境外先進(jìn)國家的實(shí)踐不難發(fā)現(xiàn),養(yǎng)老金保值增值的最有效途徑就是進(jìn)行市場化投資運(yùn)營,采用信托方式對養(yǎng)老金進(jìn)行運(yùn)營無疑是最佳選擇。英國、美國、新加坡、智利、中國香港等境外先進(jìn)國家和地區(qū)都注重從實(shí)體法和程序法的角度對養(yǎng)老金信托的立法規(guī)制、監(jiān)管體制和法律責(zé)任等內(nèi)容作出了規(guī)定。雖然各自多少存在一些不足,但從中總結(jié)出對我國具有借鑒和參考意義的內(nèi)容也是尤為必要的。 我國的養(yǎng)老金和信托制度分別開始于1951年《中華人民共和國勞動保險(xiǎn)條例》和2001年《信托法》的頒布實(shí)施。隨著信托法的實(shí)施和人們信托觀念的增強(qiáng),各種信托模式及信托功能的應(yīng)用在我國逐漸出現(xiàn)。近幾年隨著養(yǎng)老金制度的不斷改革,我國養(yǎng)老金相關(guān)立法和信托立法都有一定的進(jìn)步。然而,相對于我國養(yǎng)老金制度的改革步伐和保值增值的迫切需求,我國信托法律制度還不夠完善,許多信托模式法律關(guān)系不甚清晰,在實(shí)施中仍顯吃力,也存在諸多障礙。這些突出表現(xiàn)在我國的養(yǎng)老金立法缺乏相關(guān)的配套法律和制度,尤其是缺少與信托法等相關(guān)法律的有效協(xié)調(diào)與融合等等。制度體系的不完善在一定程度上影響了我國養(yǎng)老金投資和信托活動的全面發(fā)展。 總之,養(yǎng)老金制度與信托制度的結(jié)合不是偶然,具有充分的的理論基礎(chǔ)和現(xiàn)實(shí)價值。養(yǎng)老基金進(jìn)入資本市場是其保值增值的根本出路,而養(yǎng)老金與信托的結(jié)合也是我國養(yǎng)老金制度改革的方向。我國的基本養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)個人帳戶基金的運(yùn)營也可以借助信托制度,在借鑒發(fā)達(dá)國家養(yǎng)老基金運(yùn)作經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,建立適合我國養(yǎng)老基金的信托型運(yùn)營模式。同時對于我國養(yǎng)老金信托發(fā)展滯后的原因和制度缺陷,必須盡快研究出解決的對策及完善建議。 首先,鑒于我國養(yǎng)老金運(yùn)營立法上的空白,理應(yīng)通過制定養(yǎng)老金基本法對養(yǎng)老金的征繳、運(yùn)營、支付等方面進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制,并以法律形式確立養(yǎng)老金信托運(yùn)營的制度設(shè)計(jì),明確養(yǎng)老金信托各方當(dāng)事人以及監(jiān)管主體的權(quán)利和義務(wù)。其次,由于養(yǎng)老金的保值增值需求是以安全為前提,所以對養(yǎng)老金信托的有效監(jiān)管是保證其正常運(yùn)作必不可少的因素,這也是出于保護(hù)受益人利益的需要。設(shè)立專門的養(yǎng)老金信托監(jiān)管委員會對全國養(yǎng)老金運(yùn)作進(jìn)行統(tǒng)籌安排,能合理解決“多頭領(lǐng)導(dǎo)”的混亂監(jiān)管局面。除此之外,加強(qiáng)審計(jì)監(jiān)督、社會監(jiān)督,從而形成全面的監(jiān)管體系也是極為必要的。
[Abstract]:In the social security system, the pension system is the most representative, which is the core and foundation of the whole social security system. It is an important symbol of the level of development of national construction and the well-being of the people. As the "livelihood money" of the common people, it is equally important to ensure the safety and profitability of pension investment. Pension trusts not only have old-age security, The nature of both civil and commercial trusts can not be revoked at will. Looking at the practice of overseas advanced countries, it is not difficult to find that the most effective way to preserve and increase the value of pensions is to carry out market-oriented investment operations. It is undoubtedly the best choice to use trust to operate pension. Britain, USA, Singapore, Chile, Hong Kong, China and other advanced countries and regions all pay attention to the legislative regulation of pension trust from the angle of substantive law and procedural law. Although there are some deficiencies in the contents of supervision system and legal liability, it is necessary to sum up the contents that have reference and reference significance for our country. The old-age pension and trust system of our country began to implement in 1951 and 2001 respectively. With the implementation of trust law and the enhancement of people's trust concept, The application of various trust modes and trust functions has gradually appeared in our country. With the continuous reform of pension system in recent years, China's pension related legislation and trust legislation have made some progress. However, Compared with the reform of the pension system and the urgent need of maintaining and increasing the value of the pension system, the trust legal system of our country is not perfect enough, many trust mode legal relations are not very clear, and it is still difficult to carry out the trust system. There are also many obstacles. These outstanding manifestations are the lack of relevant supporting laws and systems in China's pension legislation. Especially the lack of effective coordination and integration with the relevant laws such as the Trust Law and so on. The imperfection of the system has affected the overall development of pension investment and trust activities in China to a certain extent. In short, the combination of the pension system and the trust system is not accidental and has sufficient theoretical basis and practical value. The entry of the pension fund into the capital market is the fundamental way out for the pension fund to maintain and increase its value. The combination of pension and trust is also the direction of pension system reform in our country. The operation of individual account fund of basic old-age insurance in our country can also benefit from trust system, on the basis of drawing lessons from the operation experience of pension fund in developed countries. At the same time, it is necessary to study the countermeasures and perfect suggestions for the reasons and institutional defects of the lagging development of pension trust in our country. First of all, in view of the blank in the legislation of pension operation in our country, we should regulate the collection, operation and payment of pension by making the basic law of pension, and establish the system design of trust operation of pension in the form of law. Make clear the rights and obligations of the parties to the pension trust and the subject of supervision. Secondly, because the requirement of maintaining and increasing the value of the pension is based on safety, the effective supervision of the pension trust is an essential factor to ensure its normal operation. This is also due to the need to protect the interests of the beneficiaries. The establishment of a special pension trust supervision committee to co-ordinate the national pension operation can reasonably solve the chaotic regulatory situation of "long leaders." in addition, we should strengthen audit supervision. Social supervision, thus forming a comprehensive regulatory system is also extremely necessary.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.282;D922.182.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜樂其;劉志國;;基本養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)基金投資運(yùn)營模式構(gòu)建——以基金所有權(quán)為視角[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2012年07期

2 張鈴娣;;淺論我國養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)基金投資信托[J];法制與社會;2008年21期

3 龍桂珍;;社會養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)基金投資監(jiān)管模式的國際比較及啟示[J];改革與開放;2009年06期

4 巴曙松;譚迎慶;丁波;;我國社�；鸨O(jiān)管的現(xiàn)狀、問題和建議[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2007年58期

5 袁航松;李仲仕;;信托產(chǎn)品流通策略研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2007年04期

6 張新民,曹明睿;我國社會保險(xiǎn)基金監(jiān)管法律制度研究[J];江西社會科學(xué);2004年02期

7 巴曙松;譚迎慶;丁波;;社�；鸨O(jiān)管的現(xiàn)狀、問題與建議[J];濟(jì)南金融;2007年06期

8 周天翔;;對我國社會保障基金監(jiān)管的思考[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年01期

9 江玉榮;;養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)基金投資監(jiān)管模式的國際發(fā)展及對我國的啟示[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2013年01期

10 黃杰;周加佳;;論我國養(yǎng)老基金信托運(yùn)營法律監(jiān)管的發(fā)展和完善[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2009年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王琳;我國社保基金運(yùn)營監(jiān)管的法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

2 田古;社�；鸨O(jiān)管法律制度研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1514152