本文關(guān)鍵詞： 可轉(zhuǎn)換債券 折價(jià) Black-Scholes模型 流動(dòng)性 發(fā)行規(guī)模　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：可轉(zhuǎn)換債券是一種混合型的債券形式,它在發(fā)行公司債券的基礎(chǔ)上,附加了一份期權(quán),允許其持有人在規(guī)定時(shí)間范圍內(nèi)按一定比例或價(jià)格將其轉(zhuǎn)換為債券發(fā)行公司的股票�？赊D(zhuǎn)換債券兼具債權(quán)和股權(quán)的特征。 中國可轉(zhuǎn)換債券發(fā)展歷史較短,1992年深寶安發(fā)行A股可轉(zhuǎn)債,是我國第一只由上市公司發(fā)行的可轉(zhuǎn)債。1997年國務(wù)院證券委員會發(fā)布《可轉(zhuǎn)換公司債券管理暫行辦法》,2001年證監(jiān)會發(fā)布《上市公司發(fā)行可轉(zhuǎn)換公司債券實(shí)施辦法》,中國可轉(zhuǎn)債市場才逐漸發(fā)展起來。2006年證監(jiān)會發(fā)布《上市公司證券發(fā)行管理辦法》,可轉(zhuǎn)債市場進(jìn)一步走向規(guī)范�？赊D(zhuǎn)債與配股、增發(fā)共同成為上市公司再融資的主要方式。 上世紀(jì)70年代以來,Black-Scholes期權(quán)定價(jià)模型為衍生金融工具的合理定價(jià)奠定了基礎(chǔ)。國外對于可轉(zhuǎn)換債券定價(jià)的研究主要有以公司價(jià)值為變量和以股價(jià)為變量的模型,二叉樹、蒙特卡洛模擬、有限差分法等數(shù)值方法。同時(shí)我們也回顧了證券折價(jià)的有關(guān)文獻(xiàn)。關(guān)于可轉(zhuǎn)債折價(jià)的國外文獻(xiàn)表明折價(jià)與后市流動(dòng)性、評級等因素相關(guān)。中國學(xué)者在可轉(zhuǎn)債的定價(jià)方面也做了比較多的研究,大部分文獻(xiàn)顯示我國可轉(zhuǎn)債存在明顯折價(jià),但是已有的研究多是對可轉(zhuǎn)債的折價(jià)現(xiàn)象提出一些可能的解釋,并且由于樣本量的限制,現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)多是基于案例分析,大樣本的實(shí)證研究很少。 本文選取了2000年至2011年3月期間在我國發(fā)行上市的76只可轉(zhuǎn)換債券作為樣本,所有數(shù)據(jù)來源于萬德數(shù)據(jù)庫及國泰安數(shù)據(jù)庫。首先,關(guān)于可轉(zhuǎn)債理論價(jià)值的確定,我們采用了Black-Scholes期權(quán)定價(jià)模型,結(jié)果顯示,樣本可轉(zhuǎn)債平均存在16%的折價(jià)。其次,通過線性回歸分析研究了可轉(zhuǎn)換債券發(fā)行折價(jià)與五個(gè)潛在影響因素的關(guān)系。實(shí)證研究表明,可轉(zhuǎn)換債券發(fā)行折價(jià)與發(fā)行規(guī)模顯著負(fù)相關(guān)；與發(fā)行公司負(fù)債率顯著正相關(guān)。其原因可能是由于較大的發(fā)行規(guī)�？梢越档托畔⒉粚ΨQ,使可轉(zhuǎn)債發(fā)行價(jià)更趨近于理論價(jià)值,折價(jià)減小；較高的負(fù)債率可能導(dǎo)致較低的償債能力,公司發(fā)行可轉(zhuǎn)債時(shí)傾向于以更大的折價(jià)吸引投資者。實(shí)證結(jié)果顯示發(fā)行折價(jià)與可轉(zhuǎn)債的流動(dòng)性、期限和評級的關(guān)系不顯著。另外,中國市場缺乏賣空機(jī)制也是導(dǎo)致可轉(zhuǎn)債大幅折價(jià)的一個(gè)原因。 本文的局限在于：一是定價(jià)模型沒有考慮到可轉(zhuǎn)債所包含的各項(xiàng)復(fù)雜條款,可以結(jié)合蒙特卡洛模擬、二叉樹等方法得到更為精確的定價(jià)；二是本文只研究了可轉(zhuǎn)債發(fā)行時(shí)的折價(jià),并未研究轉(zhuǎn)債上市整個(gè)期間理論價(jià)值與市場價(jià)格的關(guān)系；三是回歸模型的建立囿于可獲得的數(shù)據(jù),未來的研究可以包含更多潛在的影響因素,例如發(fā)行費(fèi)用、投資者結(jié)構(gòu)等。
[Abstract]:Convertible bonds are a hybrid form of bonds, with an option attached to the issuance of corporate bonds. Allows its holder to convert to the shares of a bond issuing company within a specified period of time at a certain percentage or price. Convertible bonds have the characteristics of both debt and equity. China has a short history of convertible bonds. In 1992, Shenbao'an issued A shares convertible bonds. It is the first convertible bond issued by a listed company in China. On 1997, the Securities Commission of the State Council issued the interim measures for the Administration of Convertible Company Bonds, and in 2001, the Securities Regulatory Commission issued the implementation measures for issuing Convertible Company Bonds of listed companies. In 2006, the Securities Regulatory Commission issued the "measures for the Administration of Securities issuance of listed companies", and the convertible bond market further moved towards standardization. Additional issuance has become the main way of refinancing of listed companies. Since -30s, Black-Scholes option pricing model has laid the foundation for the reasonable pricing of derivative financial instruments. Monte Carlo simulation, finite difference method and other numerical methods. At the same time, we also review the relevant literature on the discount of securities. The foreign literature on the discount of convertible bonds shows that the discount and future liquidity, Chinese scholars have also done more research on the pricing of convertible bonds. Most of the literature shows that there is a significant discount on convertible bonds in China. However, most of the existing research is to put forward some possible explanations for the discount phenomenon of convertible bonds, and because of the limitation of sample size, the existing literature is mostly based on case analysis, and there are few empirical studies on large samples. In this paper, 76 convertible bonds listed in China from 2000 to March 2011 are selected as samples. All the data come from Wanda database and Cathay Taian database. Firstly, the theoretical value of convertible bonds is determined. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the results show that the sample convertible bonds have an average discount of 16%. Secondly, through linear regression analysis, we study the relationship between the discount of convertible bond issuance and five potential influencing factors. The discounted price of convertible bonds is significantly negatively correlated with the issuing scale and the debt ratio of the issuing company is significantly positive. The reason may be that the larger issuance scale can reduce the information asymmetry and make the issuing price of convertible bonds more close to the theoretical value. Lower discounts; higher debt ratios may lead to lower solvency, and companies tend to attract investors at greater discounts when issuing convertible bonds. The relationship between maturity and rating is not significant. In addition, the lack of a short selling mechanism in the Chinese market is also one of the reasons for the sharp discount of convertible bonds. The limitations of this paper are as follows: first, the pricing model does not take into account the various complex clauses contained in convertible bonds, and can be more accurately priced with Monte Carlo simulation, binary tree and other methods; Second, this paper only studies the discount when convertible bonds are issued, and does not study the relationship between the theoretical value and the market price of convertible bonds during the whole period of listing; third, the establishment of regression model is limited by the available data. Future research may include more potential factors, such as issuance fees, investor structure, etc.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F832.51;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 袁顯平;柯大鋼;;增發(fā)、配股與可轉(zhuǎn)換債券孰“優(yōu)”孰“劣”[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2006年09期

2 唐文彬;張小勇;;LSM可轉(zhuǎn)債定價(jià)模型及其應(yīng)用研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2008年04期

3 賴其男;姚長輝;王志誠;;關(guān)于我國可轉(zhuǎn)換債券定價(jià)的實(shí)證研究[J];金融研究;2005年09期

4 張崢;唐國正;劉力;;投資者群體差異與可轉(zhuǎn)換債券折價(jià)——中國市場的實(shí)證分析[J];金融研究;2006年11期

5 聞岳春;邱小平;;我國可轉(zhuǎn)債定價(jià)模型探討[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2009年08期

6 鄭振龍,林海;中國可轉(zhuǎn)換債券定價(jià)研究[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年02期

，

本文編號：1500611