發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-15 06:37

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：證券執(zhí)法和解制度研究　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 證券執(zhí)法 和解 效率 投資者保護(hù)

【摘要】： 本論文從經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)的角度,對(duì)證券執(zhí)法和解制度的域外立法情況、實(shí)踐效果以及對(duì)于建立我國(guó)證券執(zhí)法和解制度的借鑒意義等諸方面進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的描述和探討,在結(jié)構(gòu)上主要分為五個(gè)部分: 第一部分為前言,簡(jiǎn)要介紹文章的寫(xiě)作背景和論述的切入之處。 第二部分為證券執(zhí)法和解概念闡釋與立法概況,介紹證券執(zhí)法和解制度的概念及世界各國(guó)的立法和實(shí)踐概況。 第三部分為證券執(zhí)法和解制度立法模式及內(nèi)容。在本部分中,綜合幾個(gè)主要國(guó)家關(guān)于證券執(zhí)法和解制度的立法例,分別從和解的法律依據(jù)、前提、工作程序、內(nèi)容、公開(kāi)、效力以及罰款的使用、和解的監(jiān)督等八個(gè)方面著眼進(jìn)行深入的對(duì)比和評(píng)介,審視不同制度背景下對(duì)于同一問(wèn)題的或同或異的法治理念和處理方式,并對(duì)其價(jià)值基礎(chǔ)和實(shí)踐效果等進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)。 第四部分為證券執(zhí)法和解制度特點(diǎn)與缺憾分析。即在承繼前一部分對(duì)于域外立法例的介紹的基礎(chǔ)上,更關(guān)注不同立法模式的特點(diǎn)與其之間的差異,并力圖在普遍層面上開(kāi)掘出缺憾之處,從而為我國(guó)的證券執(zhí)法和解制度的建構(gòu)提供理論資源。 第五部分為我國(guó)證券執(zhí)法和解制度之構(gòu)建。即從必要性、可行性與合法性方面著眼,論證我國(guó)應(yīng)當(dāng)參照域外立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),探索適合中國(guó)特色的證券執(zhí)法和解制度。 第六部分為結(jié)語(yǔ),對(duì)全文進(jìn)行回顧和總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:From the angle of economic law, this paper systematically describes and discusses the extraterritorial legislation, the practical effect and the significance of establishing the securities law enforcement and reconciliation system in China. Structurally, it is divided into five parts: The first part is the preface, briefly introduces the writing background of the article and the cut-in of the discussion. The second part introduces the concept of securities law enforcement and reconciliation and the general situation of legislation, including the concept of securities enforcement and settlement system and the legislation and practice of countries in the world. The third part is the legislative model and content of securities law enforcement and reconciliation system. In this part, it synthesizes the legislation examples of several major countries on securities law enforcement and settlement system, respectively from the legal basis, premise and working procedure of reconciliation. Content, openness, effectiveness and the use of fines, reconciliation supervision and other eight aspects of in-depth comparison and evaluation, to examine the same system under the same or the same or different ideas and treatment of the rule of law. And its value foundation and practice effect are evaluated. The 4th part is the analysis of the characteristics and shortcomings of the securities law enforcement and reconciliation system. That is, on the basis of the introduction of the former part of the foreign legislation, more attention is paid to the characteristics of different legislative models and the differences between them. It also tries to find out the defects on the general level, thus providing theoretical resources for the construction of the securities law enforcement and reconciliation system in our country. The 5th part is the construction of China's securities law enforcement and reconciliation system. That is, from the point of view of necessity, feasibility and legality, it demonstrates that our country should refer to the experience of foreign legislation. To explore the security law enforcement and reconciliation system suitable for Chinese characteristics. Part 6th is the conclusion of the review and summary of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.287

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳暉;論行政執(zhí)法和解程序的構(gòu)建[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

2 朱寧;保薦代表人法律制度研究[D];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1427246