發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-12 14:37

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：票據(jù)保證法律問題研究　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 票據(jù)保證 民事保證 隱存保證 部分保證

【摘要】：票據(jù)是現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)流通過程中主要使用的一種金融工具,在促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的過程中起到了重要作用。作為規(guī)范票據(jù)流通的重要法律,《中華人民共和國(guó)票據(jù)法》在其出臺(tái)至今的十八年中對(duì)于票據(jù)流通做出了巨大貢獻(xiàn)。然而由于這部法律制定之初,我國(guó)整體經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況并不發(fā)達(dá),對(duì)于票據(jù)的使用相對(duì)較少,因此很多規(guī)定并不完善,存在一些漏洞,使其無法適應(yīng)現(xiàn)在的商事需求�；诖�,本文選定票據(jù)保證制度作為研究方向,分析了這一制度存在的三個(gè)法律問題。研究目的在于通過探討現(xiàn)行規(guī)定存在的不足,對(duì)于這三個(gè)法律問題提出筆者的意見和建議,以使今后更好地完善法律,保障票據(jù)當(dāng)事人的利益。 本文整體采用總分結(jié)構(gòu)。第一部分是總體概括的一章,簡(jiǎn)要概括了票據(jù)保證制度,著重闡述了票據(jù)保證的概念和特征,以及我國(guó)《票據(jù)法》第四章和其他相關(guān)法律是如何對(duì)于這一制度進(jìn)行規(guī)定,這些規(guī)定存在哪些問題。在這一章的結(jié)尾部分引出在票據(jù)保證制度中需要探討的三個(gè)法律問題,依次是票據(jù)保證與民事保證的關(guān)系、隱存保證和部分保證問題。 第二部分依據(jù)具體案例討論票據(jù)保證和民事保證的關(guān)系問題。票據(jù)保證脫胎于民事保證,二者有一些相似的地方,導(dǎo)致在實(shí)踐中難以區(qū)分,并可能產(chǎn)生糾紛。因此本部分著重闡述票據(jù)保證和民事保證的區(qū)別,并在最后闡明筆者對(duì)此問題的看法。 第三部分主要探討隱存保證法律問題。雖然隱存保證這一概念在理論中被提出,實(shí)踐中廣泛存在,但是法律未對(duì)此問題進(jìn)行規(guī)定。因此筆者從分析該制度與票據(jù)保證的區(qū)別入手,重點(diǎn)闡述了在《票據(jù)法》中增加隱存保證有關(guān)規(guī)定的必要性,最后提出筆者關(guān)于此問題的立法建議。 第四部分研究部分保證法律問題。通過從部分保證的概念入手,分析探究了我國(guó)法律對(duì)此規(guī)定欠缺的現(xiàn)狀。為了增設(shè)《票據(jù)法》對(duì)部分保證的規(guī)定,因此對(duì)其他國(guó)家和地區(qū)的相關(guān)法律進(jìn)行了比較和分析。著重論述了部分保證制度在我國(guó)存在的必要性,并在本章最后提出相應(yīng)的立法建議。
[Abstract]:Bill is a kind of financial instrument which is mainly used in the process of modern economic circulation. It plays an important role in the process of promoting economic development. It is an important law to regulate the circulation of bills. The negotiable instrument Law of the people's Republic of China has made great contributions to the circulation of bills in the 18 years since its promulgation. However, the overall economic situation of our country was not developed at the beginning of this law. For the relatively small use of bills, many provisions are not perfect, there are some loopholes to make it unable to adapt to the current commercial requirements. Based on this, this paper chooses the bill guarantee system as the research direction. This paper analyzes the three legal problems existing in this system. The purpose of the study is to put forward my opinions and suggestions on these three legal problems by discussing the shortcomings of the existing regulations, so as to improve the law better in the future. To protect the interests of the parties to the bill. The first part is a general summary of the chapter, a brief summary of the bill guarantee system, focusing on the concept and characteristics of the bill guarantee. And how to regulate this system in Chapter 4th and other relevant laws of our country. At the end of this chapter, there are three legal problems that need to be discussed in the negotiable instrument guarantee system, which is the relationship between the bill guarantee and the civil guarantee. Implicit guarantee and partial guarantee. The second part discusses the relationship between negotiable instrument guarantee and civil guarantee according to specific cases. Bill guarantee is born out of civil guarantee. There are some similarities between the two, which lead to the difficulty of distinguishing in practice. Therefore, this part focuses on the difference between negotiable instrument guarantee and civil guarantee, and finally clarifies the author's views on this issue. The third part mainly discusses the legal problem of implicit existence guarantee. Although the concept of implicit guarantee is put forward in theory, it exists widely in practice. But the law does not provide for this issue. Therefore, the author starts with the analysis of the difference between the system and the bill guarantee, and focuses on the necessity of adding the implicit guarantee in the Bill Law. Finally, the author puts forward the legislative suggestions on this issue. Part 4th studies the legal problems of partial guarantee. By starting with the concept of partial guarantee, this paper analyzes and explores the current situation of the lack of this provision in Chinese law. In order to add the provisions of "negotiable instrument Law" to the partial guarantee. Therefore, this paper compares and analyzes the relevant laws of other countries and regions, emphatically discusses the necessity of the existence of partial guarantee system in our country, and puts forward corresponding legislative suggestions at the end of this chapter.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.287;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林艷琴;;中外票據(jù)保證制度之立法比較[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年03期

2 丁瓊;;淺議票據(jù)保證的效力[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2008年09期

3 李s，

本文編號(hào)：1414695