本文關(guān)鍵詞：創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司會(huì)計(jì)造假問題研究　出處：《東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 會(huì)計(jì)造假 創(chuàng)業(yè)板 治理對(duì)策

【摘要】：會(huì)計(jì)造假一直是各國(guó)學(xué)者比較關(guān)注的話題,然而其研究重點(diǎn)一般都集中于主板的上市公司,很少有人關(guān)注創(chuàng)業(yè)板的會(huì)計(jì)造假問題。但是創(chuàng)業(yè)板作為多層次資本市場(chǎng)的重要組成部分,直接影響資本市場(chǎng)的穩(wěn)定和發(fā)展,而且由于創(chuàng)業(yè)板設(shè)立時(shí)間還短,各項(xiàng)體制尚不健全,對(duì)創(chuàng)業(yè)板相關(guān)問題的研究也有助于創(chuàng)業(yè)板的進(jìn)一步完善。因此在本文中,筆者從創(chuàng)業(yè)板的角度出發(fā),對(duì)會(huì)計(jì)造假的相關(guān)問題展開了研究。 我國(guó)創(chuàng)業(yè)板在歷經(jīng)十年等待之后于2009年正式開板,眾多業(yè)內(nèi)人士對(duì)其報(bào)予了極大的期望,力圖將創(chuàng)業(yè)板發(fā)展為中國(guó)的納斯納克。而創(chuàng)業(yè)板在成立之初就引起了全社會(huì)的高度關(guān)注,吸引了廣大投資者的加入并迅速成長(zhǎng)和壯大。截至2012年底,創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司規(guī)模已經(jīng)由首批28家上市公司發(fā)展為355家上市公司。然而,在創(chuàng)業(yè)板急速擴(kuò)張的過程中,各種隨之而來的問題也開始逐漸暴露。首先是創(chuàng)業(yè)板業(yè)績(jī)變臉的問題。由于創(chuàng)業(yè)板聚焦中小企業(yè),也具有中小企業(yè)固有的缺陷,內(nèi)部治理結(jié)構(gòu)混亂。在企業(yè)成立初期要降低利潤(rùn)來逃避稅收,在企業(yè)上市時(shí)要提高利潤(rùn)來塑造其成長(zhǎng)型企業(yè)的形象,因此企業(yè)不得不通過包裝達(dá)到上市目的,而過度的包裝導(dǎo)致企業(yè)上市之后紛紛出現(xiàn)業(yè)績(jī)變臉。從新大地到萬福生科,IPO造假頻頻發(fā)生,這也從側(cè)面反映了作為企業(yè)上市看門人的中介機(jī)構(gòu)的不作為。其次是創(chuàng)業(yè)板的三高問題,高市盈率、高發(fā)行價(jià)、高超募資金導(dǎo)致上市公司的原始股東紛紛擠入億萬富翁的行列,中小投資者卻持續(xù)虧損,同時(shí)閑置資金無處可用,出現(xiàn)了眾多牽強(qiáng)附會(huì)的投資項(xiàng)目,這也為上市公司后續(xù)的業(yè)績(jī)變臉埋下了隱患。最后是創(chuàng)業(yè)板監(jiān)管體制薄弱的問題,由于創(chuàng)業(yè)板發(fā)展時(shí)間尚短,各種法律規(guī)范和體制都有待完善,如保薦人制度、退市制度、發(fā)審機(jī)制、處罰機(jī)制等,而這些缺陷都為會(huì)計(jì)造假提供了天然的避風(fēng)港。 本文根據(jù)對(duì)創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司會(huì)計(jì)造假的現(xiàn)狀的分析,結(jié)合對(duì)萬福生科造假案例的相關(guān)研究,依托舞弊三角形理論,委托代理和內(nèi)部人控制理論,經(jīng)濟(jì)人假設(shè)和有限理性理論,運(yùn)用規(guī)范性分析方法對(duì)其原因進(jìn)行了剖析。根據(jù)舞弊三角理論將其動(dòng)因分為機(jī)會(huì)、壓力和借口。會(huì)計(jì)造假的機(jī)會(huì)主要源于制度的缺陷,包括內(nèi)部治理結(jié)構(gòu)失效、外部審計(jì)制度缺陷、證券發(fā)行制度缺陷、創(chuàng)業(yè)板退出制度缺陷、法律規(guī)范不健全等因素。會(huì)計(jì)造假的壓力是指造假的動(dòng)機(jī),包括公司上市、配股、逃避退市的動(dòng)機(jī)或地方政府增加政績(jī)的需要。會(huì)計(jì)造假的借口來自于道德層面的問題,包括利益驅(qū)動(dòng)下的道德失范和企業(yè)文化的缺失。 隨后,本文針對(duì)以上會(huì)計(jì)造假動(dòng)因的分析,結(jié)合我國(guó)創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司自身的特點(diǎn),并借鑒國(guó)外創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司會(huì)計(jì)造假治理的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出治理創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司會(huì)計(jì)造假的措施。從個(gè)體角度應(yīng)加強(qiáng)從業(yè)人員的隊(duì)伍建設(shè)、強(qiáng)化單位負(fù)責(zé)人的責(zé)任意識(shí)、培養(yǎng)理性的證券市場(chǎng)投資者。從上市公司角度應(yīng)完善公司內(nèi)部治理結(jié)構(gòu)和內(nèi)控體系,建立倡導(dǎo)誠(chéng)信的企業(yè)文化。從中介機(jī)構(gòu)角度出發(fā),會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所和保薦機(jī)構(gòu)應(yīng)借鑒國(guó)外成熟的證券市場(chǎng)的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn),各自完善其體制。從外部監(jiān)管主體角度出發(fā),政府應(yīng)轉(zhuǎn)變職能、改良政績(jī)觀,并完善相關(guān)準(zhǔn)則制度與法律規(guī)范；行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)應(yīng)建立職業(yè)道德自律組織強(qiáng)化自律,完善獎(jiǎng)懲制度引導(dǎo)成員自律,將自律與他律相結(jié)合；社會(huì)媒體應(yīng)全力發(fā)揮其監(jiān)督與宣傳的作用,增強(qiáng)公眾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)意識(shí),使全社會(huì)形成合力,對(duì)會(huì)計(jì)造假進(jìn)行共同監(jiān)督。希望通過建立上市公司、政府、中介機(jī)構(gòu)、社會(huì)公眾四位一體的全方位監(jiān)管體系,有效減少創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司會(huì)計(jì)造假行為的發(fā)生。 由于筆者的時(shí)間和經(jīng)驗(yàn)有限,對(duì)于創(chuàng)業(yè)板相關(guān)問題的研究也還存在很多不足。但是希望通過本文的研究,可以對(duì)創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司會(huì)計(jì)造假問題的解決有所幫助。
[Abstract]:Accounting fraud has been a topic of concern of scholars, but the study focused on the main board listed companies, few people pay attention to the accounting fraud of the gem gem. But as an important part of the multi-level capital market, directly affects the stability and development of the capital market, and since the establishment of gem time in short, the system is not perfect, study the related problems of the gem also helps to further improve the gem. So in this paper, the author from the perspective of the gem, the accounting fraud related questions are discussed.
The gem in China after ten years of waiting for on 2009 officially opened, many industry insiders to the great expectations of the newspaper, trying to develop the gem and gem. China accept Si Na overcomes has attracted the attention of the whole society in the early days, adding to attract the majority of investors and the rapid growth and strong. As of the end of 2012, the GEM listed companies have the scale by the first batch of 28 listed companies for the development of the 355 listed companies. However, the process of rapid expansion in the gem, all the attendant problems are gradually exposed. The first is the gem performance face the problem. Because the market focus of small and medium-sized enterprises, but also has defects small and medium-sized enterprises inherent in the internal governance structure of chaos. In early establishment enterprises to reduce the profit to evade tax, in the listing of enterprises to increase profits to shape the growth type enterprise image, for the enterprise Through the packaging industry to achieve the purpose of the listing, and excessive packaging have led to the emergence of enterprise performance face after the listing. From the new land to Edmond branch, IPO fraud occurred frequently, it also reflected from the intermediary companies listed as not as a janitor. Second is the three problems of the gem, high earnings, high issue price, superb raised funds of Listed Companies in the original shareholders have to squeeze into the ranks of billionaires, small investors have continued losses, and no idle funds available, there are many far fetched investment projects, it is also the follow-up performance of listed companies face potential problems. Finally, the gem supervision system is weak, due to the development of gem is still short, all kinds of legal norms and the system needs to be improved, such as the sponsor system, delisting system, trial mechanism, punishment mechanism, and these defects are Accounting forgery provides a natural refuge.
According to the analysis of the status quo of the GEM listed company's accounting fraud, with the relevant research on Hail hygiene fraud case, relying on the fraud triangle theory, control theory of agent and insiders, the theory of economic man hypothesis and limited rationality, using the normative analysis method to analyze the reason according to the theory of fraud. Motivation is divided into opportunity, pressure and excuses. Defects of accounting fraud opportunities mainly originated from the system, including the failure of internal governance structure and external audit system defect, system defect and issuance of securities, the gem exit system defects, the law is not perfect and other factors. The pressure of accounting fraud refers to the fraud motivation, including listed companies, shares and avoid delisting motives or local governments to increase performance needs. The excuse of accounting fraud from the moral dimension of the problem, including the benefits of moral anomie and enterprises The lack of industry culture.
Then, this paper analyzes the reasons for the above accounting fraud, according to the characteristics of China's GEM listed companies themselves, and learn from experience of the governance of accounting fraud of foreign companies listed on GEM, the GEM listed company governance of accounting fraud measures. From the perspective of individual practitioners should strengthen team construction, strengthen the responsibility of the person in charge consciousness, cultivating rational stock market. Investors should improve the internal governance structure and internal control system from the perspective of listed companies, establish integrity of corporate culture. Starting from the agency perspective, relevant experience in accounting firms and the sponsor should draw lessons from foreign mature securities market, improve its respective system. From the perspective of external supervision the government should change their functions and improvement, performance concept, and improve the relevant standards and legal norms; industry associations should establish occupation moral self-discipline Organizations to strengthen self-discipline, improve the reward system to guide members will be combined with self-discipline, self-discipline heteronomy; social media should fully play its role of supervision and propaganda, to enhance public awareness of risk, make the whole society to form a cohesive force, joint supervision of the accounting fraud. Hope that through the establishment of a listed company, government, intermediary organizations, a full range of social supervision system one of the four public, effectively reduce the gem accounting fraud of listed companies.
Due to the limited time and experience of the author, there are still many deficiencies in the research of gem, but I hope this research can help to solve the accounting fraud problem of GEM listed companies.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F275.2;F832.51

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程安林;梁芬蓮;黎軍;;會(huì)計(jì)造假與會(huì)計(jì)監(jiān)管的博弈分析[J];商業(yè)研究;2009年06期

2 池兆念;會(huì)計(jì)信息質(zhì)量的制度倫理思考[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2005年01期

3 王簡(jiǎn);孟淑芳;;我國(guó)環(huán)境會(huì)計(jì)信息披露研究綜述[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2011年32期

4 王華,莊學(xué)敏;上市公司會(huì)計(jì)信息失真的問卷調(diào)查分析[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2005年01期

5 藺漢杰;;我國(guó)創(chuàng)業(yè)板市場(chǎng)退市機(jī)制探討[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年02期

6 葉春和;;我國(guó)創(chuàng)業(yè)板市場(chǎng)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素及監(jiān)管對(duì)策初探[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2009年08期

7 林楓;范錳杰;;我國(guó)保薦人制度:市場(chǎng)的“守夜人”抑或“合謀者”——基于中小板綠大地公司的案例分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)學(xué)習(xí);2011年06期

8 劉宏濤;王維華;楊彬;;企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)造假行為及監(jiān)管演化博弈分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2012年36期

9 呂敏;曾富全;;會(huì)計(jì)造假處罰為何避重就輕——柳州兩面針股份有限公司受罰案例分析[J];財(cái)務(wù)與會(huì)計(jì)(理財(cái)版);2011年08期

10 程仲鳴;;我國(guó)創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司監(jiān)管體系構(gòu)建的思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2010年52期

，

本文編號(hào)：1385101