【摘要】：企業(yè)的股權(quán)激勵(lì)是企業(yè)的一種激勵(lì)的方式,實(shí)際上是為了降低企業(yè)的代理成本,想要使得企業(yè)管理層的利益與其股東利益的趨利方向相同,最后加大了管理層員工的管理層的上進(jìn)心,進(jìn)而增加該企業(yè)經(jīng)營業(yè)績的計(jì)劃。上個(gè)世紀(jì)七十年代西方股權(quán)激勵(lì)制度開始快速發(fā)展,而又從現(xiàn)代企業(yè)理論的實(shí)踐情況可以得知,也的確實(shí)現(xiàn)了積極的激勵(lì)成效,股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃能使該公司擁有所有權(quán)的人、經(jīng)營管理的人與員工三者利益方向一致。實(shí)現(xiàn)對其目標(biāo)人的正面激勵(lì)。通過此種激勵(lì)的方法來解決企業(yè)的委托代理中出現(xiàn)的問題,促進(jìn)企業(yè)持續(xù)長遠(yuǎn)的發(fā)展。實(shí)際上,我國股權(quán)激勵(lì)的探索與實(shí)踐隨著相關(guān)制度的完善、法律法規(guī)的健全逐漸走向成熟,因此我國越來越多的企業(yè)開始接受、學(xué)習(xí)并實(shí)踐激勵(lì)計(jì)劃�；诖爽F(xiàn)狀,本文針對股權(quán)激勵(lì)的研究,評價(jià)中興通訊企業(yè)兩期股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃方案及其實(shí)施效果,對我國即將實(shí)施和接受股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃的企業(yè)或個(gè)人有著現(xiàn)實(shí)的作用。對影響企業(yè)如何設(shè)計(jì)方案和選擇激勵(lì)模式有積極的意義。中興通訊在2006年、2013年分別開始實(shí)行兩次股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃,作為我國高科技技術(shù)設(shè)備上市公司,此舉備受關(guān)注與討論。因此本文對這兩次股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃進(jìn)行對比分析研究,分析對比其實(shí)行的內(nèi)容,發(fā)現(xiàn)兩次股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃分別選取了限制性的股票模式和股票期權(quán)的模式。為了評價(jià)中興通訊的股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃,本文對兩次股權(quán)激勵(lì)實(shí)施效果從短期經(jīng)營績效、長期經(jīng)營績效、人力資本與自主創(chuàng)新四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行評價(jià)。研究結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),兩次股權(quán)激勵(lì)都產(chǎn)生了比較積極的作用,但第一次實(shí)行的成效在短時(shí)間有有效,長時(shí)間激勵(lì)不足。通過對兩次股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃的比較,本文認(rèn)為出現(xiàn)這一問題主要是因?yàn)橛行┕蓹?quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃的要素制定不恰當(dāng),但中興通訊企業(yè)選擇的股權(quán)激勵(lì)模式是有一定的合理性的。除此之外,企業(yè)在設(shè)立股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃時(shí)還需要關(guān)注股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃要素的設(shè)立,根據(jù)企業(yè)自身情況合理的制定激勵(lì)要素。
[Abstract]:The equity incentive of the enterprise is a kind of incentive way of the enterprise, in fact, in order to reduce the agency cost of the enterprise, want to make the benefit of the management of the enterprise and the benefit direction of its stockholder is the same. Finally, the management of the management staff to increase the initiative, and then increase the business performance of the plan. The western equity incentive system began to develop rapidly in the 1970s, and it can be seen from the practice of modern enterprise theory that positive incentives have indeed been achieved. The equity incentive plan enables the owner of the company to own the right of ownership. The management of the personnel and employees in line with the interests of the direction. Achieve positive motivation to its target person. Through this incentive method to solve the problems in the principal-agent, to promote the long-term development of enterprises. In fact, the exploration and practice of equity incentive in our country with the improvement of relevant systems, the sound of laws and regulations gradually matured, so more and more enterprises in our country began to accept, learn and practice the incentive plan. Based on this situation, this paper aims at the research of equity incentive, evaluates the plan and its effect of two phases of equity incentive plan in ZTE enterprise, which has a realistic effect on the enterprises or individuals about to implement and accept the equity incentive plan in our country. It has positive significance on how to design scheme and choose incentive mode. ZTE began to implement two equity incentive plans in 2006 and 2013, which has attracted much attention and discussion as a listed company of high-tech equipment in China. Therefore, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the two equity incentive plans, analyzes and compares the contents of the two equity incentive plans, and finds that the two equity incentive plans choose the restrictive stock model and the stock option model respectively. In order to evaluate ZTE's equity incentive plan, this paper evaluates the effect of twice equity incentive from four aspects: short-term performance, long-term performance, human capital and independent innovation. The results show that both equity incentives have a positive effect, but the effect of the first implementation is effective in a short period of time, but insufficient in a long period of time. By comparing the two equity incentive plans, this paper argues that this problem is mainly due to the improper formulation of some elements of the equity incentive plan, but the equity incentive mode chosen by ZTE is reasonable to some extent. In addition, enterprises should pay attention to the establishment of equity incentive plan elements when establishing equity incentive plan, and make incentive elements reasonably according to the enterprise's own situation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F626;F272.92

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何瑛;舒文瓊;;“天子”與“庶民”的狂歡——中興通訊股權(quán)激勵(lì)案評析[J];財(cái)務(wù)與會計(jì);2015年13期

2 劉章勝;;中西方股權(quán)激勵(lì)機(jī)制效應(yīng)比較[J];社會科學(xué)家;2014年08期

3 周嘉南;陳效東;;高管股權(quán)激勵(lì)動機(jī)差異對公司績效的影響研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2014年02期

4 魏昌國;;我國公司股權(quán)激勵(lì)現(xiàn)狀、問題及對策研究[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2014年06期

5 曹建安;聶磊;李珊;;上市公司高管股權(quán)激勵(lì)與企業(yè)業(yè)績的實(shí)證關(guān)系研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2013年01期

6 秦毅;劉虹;;基于平衡記分卡的企業(yè)績效評價(jià)體系構(gòu)建[J];沈陽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2013年03期

7 陳少華;陳愛華;;企業(yè)生命周期劃分及度量方法評析[J];財(cái)會月刊;2012年27期

8 田黎龍;;淺論我國股權(quán)激勵(lì)法律制度[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2012年S3期

9 陳紅;;企業(yè)股權(quán)激勵(lì)模式的利弊分析[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2012年06期

10 李進(jìn)波;丁雨;;基于企業(yè)生命周期理論的企業(yè)股權(quán)激勵(lì)模式選擇[J];企業(yè)導(dǎo)報(bào);2010年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 陳勤;高科技上市公司股權(quán)激勵(lì)績效研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2014年

2 陳玲;我國上市公司股權(quán)激勵(lì)與公司績效的相關(guān)性研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2013年

3 高偉靜;基于企業(yè)生命周期的管理層股權(quán)激勵(lì)效應(yīng)分析[D];東華大學(xué);2011年

4 邱天耿;中國上市公司股權(quán)激勵(lì)模式比較研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2217882