中國電信業(yè)規(guī)制政策與效率分析
本文選題:電信效率 + 接入定價(jià) ; 參考:《山東大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文
【摘要】:電信業(yè)作為關(guān)系國計(jì)民生的支柱產(chǎn)業(yè),發(fā)揮著越來越重要的作用。從1994年中國聯(lián)通的成立,到1998年對郵電拆分,組建信息產(chǎn)業(yè)部,經(jīng)過不斷的拆分、整合、重組,形成包括中國移動,中國聯(lián)通,中國電信,中國網(wǎng)通,中國鐵通及中國衛(wèi)通的“5+1”競爭模式,再到2008年的“六合三”改革,我國電信業(yè)基本形成了中國移動、中國電信、中國聯(lián)通三大運(yùn)營商“三足鼎立”的競爭局面。改革的目的是明確的,就是要“打破壟斷,促進(jìn)競爭”,形成有效的市場競爭體系,實(shí)現(xiàn)電信業(yè)的高效率。然而,伴隨著電信業(yè)市場化的改革,行業(yè)的效率真的提高了嗎?電信業(yè)的拆分、重組真的提高了消費(fèi)者的福利了嗎?政府應(yīng)該完全放開還是應(yīng)該繼續(xù)管制?應(yīng)該采取怎樣的規(guī)制方法?因此,對電信業(yè)效率問題及規(guī)制政策研究等一系列問題是一個具有理論意思和現(xiàn)實(shí)意思的課題,值得深入思考。 本文分為五章。 第一章是導(dǎo)論。本章包括問題的提出及研究意義,相關(guān)的文獻(xiàn)綜述,論文的行文思路、基本框架及研究方法,創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)和不足。 第二章是中國電信業(yè)改革發(fā)展歷程及績效分析。本章分為兩小節(jié),分別從電信改革產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和績效兩方面進(jìn)行論述,通過研究我國電信產(chǎn)業(yè)體制改革、運(yùn)營模式改革、競爭模式改革、價(jià)格模式改革及績效影響等方面的變化,反映我國電信產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)制的效果以及對電信產(chǎn)業(yè)的影響,為下面電信業(yè)效率的研究、非對稱管制政策的實(shí)施做鋪墊。 第三章是中國電信業(yè)績效分析——效率測評及影響因素分析。本章以2005-2009年全國31個省市的電信運(yùn)營數(shù)據(jù)為樣本,用DEA法分別對各省市各年份進(jìn)行效率值的測算,隨后引入可能影響效率值的多種因素,通過分析價(jià)格上限規(guī)制和結(jié)構(gòu)重組因素等規(guī)制政策對效率的影響,得出相關(guān)結(jié)論。同時,引入非對稱管制的概念,為政府的管制方向和管制重點(diǎn)提供思路。 第四章是中國電信業(yè)非對稱管制分析——以互聯(lián)互通資費(fèi)管制為例。本章在前面幾章的基礎(chǔ)上,從管制者的角度審視,尋求提升中國電信業(yè)效率、促進(jìn)行業(yè)競爭的方法和途徑,屬于電信業(yè)規(guī)制政策研究內(nèi)容。非對稱管制很重要的一部分內(nèi)容是接入定價(jià)問題,通過對這一問題進(jìn)行理論上的分析,借鑒國際上目前的主流接入方法,結(jié)合我國實(shí)際,得出我國應(yīng)采用長期增量成本法。 第五章是本文結(jié)論和政策建議。本章是對前面四章內(nèi)容的總結(jié)和提煉,在此基礎(chǔ)上提出中國電信業(yè)改革發(fā)展的政策建議。隨著市場化改革的不斷推進(jìn),電信業(yè)總體效率是不斷提高的,政府應(yīng)加大規(guī)制力度,不斷完善監(jiān)管體系,實(shí)施非對稱管制,多角度多層次對電信行業(yè)進(jìn)行改革,真正逐步實(shí)現(xiàn)行業(yè)的跨越式發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Telecommunications industry, as a pillar industry related to the national economy and people's livelihood, is playing a more and more important role. From the establishment of China Unicom in 1994 to the separation of posts and telecommunications in 1998 and the establishment of the Ministry of Information Industry, through continuous separation, integration, reorganization, including China Mobile, China Unicom, China Telecom, China Netcom, By the "51" competition model of China Railway and China Satellite Communications, and by the reform of "Liuhe three" in 2008, the competition situation of three major operators of China Mobile, China Telecom and China Unicom has been basically formed in China Telecom Industry. The aim of the reform is to "break the monopoly, promote competition", form an effective market competition system and realize the high efficiency of the telecommunication industry. However, with the reform of telecommunications market, has the efficiency of the industry really improved? Has the separation and restructuring of the telecommunications industry really increased consumer welfare? Should the government be completely liberalized or should it continue to regulate? What kind of regulation methods should be adopted? Therefore, a series of problems, such as the efficiency of telecommunication industry and the study of regulatory policy, are a subject of theoretical and practical significance, which is worth further thinking. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is an introduction. This chapter includes the question raising and research significance, the related literature review, the article writing thought, the basic frame and the research method, the innovation point and the insufficiency. The second chapter is the development course and performance analysis of China's telecom industry reform. This chapter is divided into two sections, respectively from the telecommunications reform industry structure and performance two aspects of the discussion, through the study of China's telecommunications industry system reform, business model reform, competition model reform, price model reform and performance impact, and so on. It reflects the effect of the regulation of China's telecom industry and its influence on the telecommunication industry. It paves the way for the following research on the efficiency of telecom industry and the implementation of asymmetric regulation policy. The third chapter is the performance analysis of Chinese telecom industry-efficiency evaluation and analysis of influencing factors. This chapter takes the data of telecommunication operation of 31 provinces and cities in China from 2005 to 2009 as a sample, calculates the efficiency value of each province and city by using DEA method, and then introduces many factors that may affect the efficiency value. By analyzing the effect of price cap regulation and structural restructuring on efficiency, the relevant conclusions are drawn. At the same time, the concept of asymmetric regulation is introduced to provide ideas for the direction and focus of government regulation. Chapter four is the analysis of asymmetric regulation of China telecom industry-taking interconnection tariff regulation as an example. Based on the previous chapters, this chapter looks at the ways and means of promoting the efficiency and competition of China's telecom industry from the perspective of regulators, which belongs to the research content of regulation policy of telecom industry. Asymmetric regulation is an important part of the access pricing problem. Through the theoretical analysis of this problem, drawing lessons from the current mainstream international access methods, combined with the reality of our country, it is concluded that long-term incremental cost method should be adopted in our country. The fifth chapter is the conclusion of this paper and policy recommendations. This chapter summarizes and refines the contents of the previous four chapters, and then puts forward some policy suggestions for the reform and development of China's telecommunications industry. With the continuous promotion of market-oriented reform, the overall efficiency of the telecommunications industry is constantly improving. The government should strengthen regulation, constantly improve the regulatory system, implement asymmetric regulation, and carry out multi-angle and multi-level reform of the telecommunications industry. Truly realize the leapfrog development of the industry step by step.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:F626
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 白秀廣;聞捷;趙雪峰;舒華英;;電信運(yùn)營企業(yè)經(jīng)營效率與影響因子分析[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期
2 闞凱力;電信網(wǎng)絡(luò)的二維成本分析[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期
3 姜春海;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)接入定價(jià)的ECPR方法研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年06期
4 于立;姜春海;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)Ramsey接入定價(jià)方法研究[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2007年09期
5 陳代云;網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)的規(guī)制改革:以電力、電信為例[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年08期
6 肖興志;中國自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)制改革模式研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年04期
7 肖興志,陳艷利;縱向一體化網(wǎng)絡(luò)的接入定價(jià)研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年06期
8 于良春;論自然壟斷與自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)的政府規(guī)制[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年02期
9 于良春;丁啟軍;;自然壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)進(jìn)入管制的成本收益分析——以中國電信業(yè)為例的實(shí)證研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年01期
10 劉蔚;;我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)型基礎(chǔ)產(chǎn)業(yè)改革的績效分析——以電信、電力產(chǎn)業(yè)為例[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年08期
,本文編號:1817306
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/xxjj/1817306.html