本文選題：產(chǎn)學研合作 + 產(chǎn)學研合作組織　； 參考：《長春工業(yè)大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：創(chuàng)新是我國的五大發(fā)展理念之一,也是我國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的內(nèi)在驅動力,建設創(chuàng)新型國家是我國新時期的重要戰(zhàn)略目標,但是創(chuàng)新的關鍵在于建立以企業(yè)為目標,市場為導向,產(chǎn)學研相結合的技術創(chuàng)新體系。產(chǎn)學研合作是實現(xiàn)國家創(chuàng)新的基本途徑,因此產(chǎn)學研合作的順利運行是國家創(chuàng)新體系得以運行的基礎和前提條件。產(chǎn)學研合作是產(chǎn)業(yè)、高校和學研機構基于各自優(yōu)勢的基礎上進行資源共享,彼此相互作用,共擔風險,共享創(chuàng)新成果,使得整體利益超過部分利益之和的合作過程。我國目前產(chǎn)學研合作形式雖然很多,但是大都停留在科技成果轉移方式和項目委托開發(fā)方式,這些單方向、淺層次的合作方式無法掩蓋產(chǎn)學研合作成功率低、合作形式大于內(nèi)容的事實,并沒有從根本上起到提高科技成果產(chǎn)業(yè)化。究其根本原因是,我國產(chǎn)學研大多都是以短期化,臨時性合作為主,以項目為合作目的,僅限于項目層面,一旦項目完成意味著合作終止,結合的方式單一,深度,廣度和效度不夠。另外,大學和科研機構是技術供給方,企業(yè)為技術需求方,然而技術供給方和需求方由于價值取向的不同,彼此嚴重脫節(jié)。因此,高校和科研機構的大量科研成果得不到轉化,導致閑置一旁被浪費,企業(yè)又不能從高校和科研機構中獲得所需的技術成果,缺乏競爭力,很難在激烈的市場競爭中立足。這些現(xiàn)象的根源是當下產(chǎn)學研合作的結合方式僅僅局限于高校和科研機構單方向的科技成果轉移和企業(yè)將項目單方向委托給高校和科研機構。針對目前產(chǎn)學研合作的現(xiàn)狀,本文從管理學中的組織視角和組織與邊界關系層面出發(fā),為產(chǎn)學研合作提供一種新的研究思路。通過對產(chǎn)學研合作組織適用邊界即創(chuàng)新能力邊界演化的影響因素進行歸納,分析歸納得到兩個關鍵影響因素,資源共享水平和相互作用力。在借鑒社會學中個人不同觀點演化思想的基礎上,構建了關于產(chǎn)學研合作組織創(chuàng)新能力邊界的演化模型,通過對能力邊界運動軌跡的分析得到基礎的組合機制,風險分擔機制和利益分配機制,最后結合實際案例即長春工業(yè)大學和吉林化纖集團之間建立的產(chǎn)學研合作進行分析,將理論與實踐相結合,為今后產(chǎn)學研合作研究提供一些新的方向和依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Innovation is one of the five major development ideas of our country and the internal driving force of our country's economic development. Building an innovative country is an important strategic goal in the new period of our country. But the key to the innovation is to establish a new system of technology based on the enterprise as the goal, the market oriented and the combination of production, learning and research. Therefore, the smooth operation of the cooperation between production, learning and research is the basis and prerequisite for the operation of the national innovation system. The cooperation of production, learning and research is an industry, and the institutions of higher learning and research and research institutions share resources on the basis of their respective advantages, interact with each other, share risks, share the results of innovation, and make the overall interests more than part of the benefits. Although there are many forms of production, school and research cooperation in China at present, most of them remain in the mode of transfer of scientific and technological achievements and the way of project entrustment. These single direction and shallow cooperation can not cover the fact that the success rate of the cooperation is low, the form of cooperation is greater than the content, and it does not fundamentally improve the industrialization of scientific and technological achievements. The fundamental reason is that most of the domestic research and research institutes are mainly short-term and temporary cooperation. The project is the goal of cooperation and is limited to the project level. Once the project is completed, the cooperation is terminated and the combination mode is single, the depth, the breadth and validity are not enough. In addition, the universities and scientific research institutions are the technical suppliers and the enterprises are the technology demand side. The technology supplier and the demand side are disjointed seriously because of the different value orientation. Therefore, a large number of scientific research achievements of universities and scientific research institutions can not be transformed, which leads to waste of idle side, and the enterprises can not obtain the necessary technical achievements from universities and scientific research institutions, lack the competitiveness, and it is difficult to stand in the fierce market competition. The root of some of the phenomena is that the combination of production, learning and research cooperation is limited to the transfer of scientific and technological achievements in a single direction by universities and scientific research institutions and the enterprises to entrust a single direction to universities and scientific research institutions. The research and research cooperation provides a new way of thinking. Through the induction of the factors affecting the boundary evolution of the production, learning and research cooperation organization, that is, the boundary evolution of innovation ability, two key factors, the level of resource sharing and the interaction force are analyzed and summed up. The evolution model of the innovation ability boundary of the cooperative organization of industry, education and research institutes, through the analysis of the track of the ability boundary, the combination mechanism, the risk sharing mechanism and the benefit distribution mechanism are obtained. Finally, the analysis of the cooperation between the Changchun University of Technology and the Jilin chemical fiber group is carried out in combination with the actual case, which combines the theory with the practice. All of these will provide some new directions and basis for future research on industry university research cooperation.

【學位授予單位】：長春工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G322;F273.1;F279.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 龔紅;查冰川;;產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新組織模式演進與優(yōu)化研究[J];科技進步與對策;2014年21期

2 王進富;趙慧;張穎穎;;產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新自組織作用機制研究[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2014年10期

3 林偉連;;產(chǎn)學研合作共同體:內(nèi)涵特征與構建路徑[J];高等工程教育研究;2013年04期

4 盛永祥;黃小芳;吳潔;;產(chǎn)學研合作研發(fā)組織中控制權問題的研究[J];江蘇科技大學學報(自然科學版);2013年02期

5 肖丁丁;朱桂龍;;產(chǎn)學研合作創(chuàng)新效率及其影響因素的實證研究[J];科研管理;2013年01期

6 萬百五;;管理控制論:回顧、展望與評述[J];控制理論與應用;2012年11期

7 李梅芳;趙永翔;唐振鵬;;產(chǎn)學研合作成效關鍵影響因素研究——基于合作開展與合作滿意的視角[J];科學學研究;2012年12期

8 吳悅;顧新;;產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的知識協(xié)同過程研究[J];中國科技論壇;2012年10期

9 刁麗琳;朱桂龍;許治;;國外產(chǎn)學研合作研究述評、展望與啟示[J];外國經(jīng)濟與管理;2011年02期

10 孫志剛;杜麗娟;;產(chǎn)業(yè)組織演化理論及其在我國的研究現(xiàn)狀[J];河北理工大學學報(社會科學版);2010年06期

，

本文編號：1829738