本文選題：融資租賃 + 統(tǒng)合監(jiān)管��； 參考：《上海交通大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：融資租賃自80年代進入我國以來，發(fā)展道路極為曲折。近幾年來雖發(fā)展有所提速，但由于二元制監(jiān)管模式所導(dǎo)致的監(jiān)管混亂，在一定程度上制約了整個行業(yè)的健康發(fā)展，使得我國融資租賃與國際先進國家相比還有比較大的差距。本文從我國融資租賃業(yè)的30余年的發(fā)展歷程和現(xiàn)狀入手，指出我國融資租賃監(jiān)管二元體制的由來及存在的不足，并通過對國外融資租賃發(fā)達國家監(jiān)管模式的比較總結(jié)，提出了進一步調(diào)整和完善我國融資租賃監(jiān)管法律制度的建議和對策。本文共分四個部分： 第一章是對我國融資租賃業(yè)務(wù)發(fā)展及監(jiān)管的概述。在對融資租賃的概念以及性質(zhì)進行理論分析的基礎(chǔ)上，進一步明確了對融資租賃業(yè)務(wù)實施監(jiān)管的必要性，并將我國融資租賃業(yè)三十余年的發(fā)展與法律規(guī)制情況進行對照分析。 第二章是對我國融資租賃監(jiān)管法律制度現(xiàn)狀的考察。在分析闡述二元監(jiān)管體制由來的同時，，指出二元監(jiān)管體制下我國融資租賃監(jiān)管存在的三大問題癥結(jié)。 第三章主要介紹了國外發(fā)達國家三種融資租賃監(jiān)管模式，分別是以美國為代表的市場調(diào)控模式、德國為代表的適度調(diào)控模式以及法國為代表的嚴(yán)格監(jiān)管模式，并指出要在借鑒國外做法經(jīng)驗進行的基礎(chǔ)上，立足我國國情，探索構(gòu)建適應(yīng)我國融資租賃業(yè)務(wù)發(fā)展的監(jiān)管模式。 第四章對完善我國融資租賃監(jiān)管法律制度提出了若干建議。主要通過對以上幾章的比較分析，從明確一元制監(jiān)管主體、堅持適度監(jiān)管模式以及統(tǒng)一監(jiān)管法律體系入手，對在一元監(jiān)管制下我國融資租賃監(jiān)管制度的完善提出了具體對策。
[Abstract]:Since the finance lease entered our country in the 1980s , the development road is extremely tortuous . In recent years , although the development has been promoted , the regulatory confusion caused by the dual - system supervision mode has restricted the health development of the whole industry to a certain extent . The paper points out that China ' s financing lease has a big gap compared with the international advanced countries . In this paper , the author points out that the financing lease in China has a big gap compared with the international advanced countries .

Chapter One is an overview of the development and supervision of financing lease business in China . On the basis of theoretical analysis of the concept and nature of financing lease , the necessity of implementing supervision on financing lease business is further clarified , and the development of China ' s financing lease industry in more than 30 years is compared with the legal regulation .

The second chapter is the investigation of the current status of the legal system of financing lease supervision in China . At the same time , the author points out the three major problems in the supervision of finance lease under the dual supervision system .

The third chapter mainly introduces three kinds of financing lease supervision modes in developed countries , which are the market control mode represented by the United States , the moderate adjustment mode represented by Germany and the strict supervision mode represented by France , and points out that based on the experience of foreign practice , it is necessary to establish the regulatory model to adapt to the development of China ' s finance lease business .

The fourth chapter puts forward some suggestions on improving the legal system of China ' s financial leasing supervision .
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.49

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 鐘林雄;試論中國的融資租賃立法[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2000年02期

2 張武,何平;論融資租賃的風(fēng)險控制機制[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年04期

3 黃桂琴;李慧英;;融資租賃的法律性質(zhì)與形式[J];河北學(xué)刊;2010年02期

4 蔡偉;《融資租賃法》難產(chǎn)多頭監(jiān)管格局待破[J];中國經(jīng)濟周刊;2005年22期

5 汪全勝;行政立法的“部門利益”傾向及制度防范[J];中國行政管理;2002年05期

本文編號：2055103