本文選題：合法持票人 + 對價��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國《票據(jù)法》中并沒有劃分持票人的類型，只是籠統(tǒng)地稱為“持票人”，但細(xì)究條文，不同條文中持票人的內(nèi)涵和權(quán)利并不相同。本文主要論述合法持票人，即取得票據(jù)的方式不違反法律規(guī)定，享有票據(jù)權(quán)利且其權(quán)利能享受到法律最為完整保護(hù)的持票人，相較于其他類型持票人，，其所受的票據(jù)抗辯被法律嚴(yán)格限制。 本文運(yùn)用比較分析法、輔以實證分析法和法解釋學(xué)方法對合法持票人及其法律實用問題進(jìn)行了全面的梳理和深入的論證，并在第三章和第四章對我國現(xiàn)行立法條文進(jìn)行了深入的分析，提出了相應(yīng)的建議。 本文除引言外，還有正文和結(jié)語兩個部分。 引言主要介紹了本文的寫作背景、研究意義、研究方法和創(chuàng)新之處。 正文分為五個部分： 第一章分析了合法持票人的概念界定問題。本部分首先對我國法中持票人類型進(jìn)行大致劃分，在對域外立法和我國司法實務(wù)進(jìn)行考察梳理的基礎(chǔ)上，總結(jié)出了我國法中合法持票人的構(gòu)成要件，此外也論述了合法持票人與其他類型持票人的區(qū)別。 第二章分析了票據(jù)對價問題。首先，在闡述合同對價的起源和概念特征的基礎(chǔ)上，論述了票據(jù)對價與之不同之處；其次，通過對票據(jù)對價與票據(jù)無因性，票據(jù)對價與票據(jù)效力和取得票據(jù)權(quán)利進(jìn)行對比，并討論支付部分對價的法律效果等內(nèi)容論述了支付對價的法律效果；最后，闡述了對我國《票據(jù)法》第10條第2款的理解問題。 第三章分析了善意問題。首先，從善意的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)出發(fā)，分別論述了“惡意”和“重大過失”的概念和內(nèi)涵，并對二者的具體表現(xiàn)形式進(jìn)行了探討；其次，對我國《票據(jù)法》第12條第2款進(jìn)行了理論分析、法條分析和實證分析，提出其不合理之處；最后，探討了票據(jù)的善意取得問題，并對無處分權(quán)人的類型進(jìn)行了細(xì)分。 第四章論述了票據(jù)形式合法問題。提出并論述了票據(jù)形式合法問題包括票據(jù)的記載內(nèi)容要符合法律規(guī)定，票據(jù)的記載方法要符合法律規(guī)定和票據(jù)記載的載體要符合法律規(guī)定。 第五章論述了合法持票人的權(quán)利保護(hù)問題。主要論述了票據(jù)喪失救濟(jì)和票據(jù)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)。在票據(jù)喪失救濟(jì)中論述了票據(jù)相對喪失和絕對喪失時的權(quán)利保護(hù)問題，在票據(jù)侵權(quán)救濟(jì)總論述了偽造出票和偽造背書場合的救濟(jì)問題。
[Abstract]:In our country's negotiable instrument Law, there is no division of the type of bearer, but it is generally called "holder of ticket", but the meaning and rights of holder in different articles are not the same. This paper mainly discusses the legal bearer, that is, the holder who has the right to the bill and whose right can enjoy the most complete protection of the law, compared with other types of bearer, which does not violate the provisions of the law and has the right to obtain the bill in a manner that is not in violation of the provisions of the law. The bill defense to which it is subjected is strictly restricted by law. This paper, by means of comparative analysis, empirical analysis and legal hermeneutics, comprehensively combs the legal holders and their legal practical problems. In the third and fourth chapters, the current legislative provisions of our country are deeply analyzed, and corresponding suggestions are put forward. In addition to the introduction, there are two parts of the text and conclusion. The introduction mainly introduces the writing background, research significance, research methods and innovations of this paper. The text is divided into five parts: The first chapter analyzes the definition of legal bearer. This part firstly roughly divides the types of holders of ticket holders in our country's law. On the basis of investigating and combing the extraterritorial legislation and the judicial practice of our country, it summarizes the constitutive requirements of legal holders of ticket holders in Chinese law. In addition, the difference between legal bearer and other types of bearer is also discussed. The second chapter analyzes the consideration of bills. First of all, on the basis of explaining the origin and conceptual characteristics of contract consideration, the paper discusses the difference between bill consideration and bill consideration; secondly, through the comparison between bill consideration and bill non-causality, the validity of bill consideration and bill and the acquisition of bill right, The legal effect of payment consideration is discussed, and finally, the understanding of the second paragraph of Article 10 of our country's negotiable instrument Law is expounded. The third chapter analyzes the problem of goodwill. First of all, the paper discusses the concept and connotation of "malice" and "gross negligence", and discusses their concrete forms of expression. The second paragraph of Article 12 of the Bill Law of our country is analyzed in theory, article 12 and empirical analysis, and the irrationality is put forward. Finally, the problem of bona fide acquisition of bills is discussed, and the types of people with nowhere to be separated are subdivided. The fourth chapter discusses the legal issue of bill form. This paper puts forward and discusses the legal issues of the form of instruments, including that the contents of the notes should conform to the legal provisions, that the recording methods of the bills should conform to the legal provisions and that the carriers of the notes should conform to the legal provisions. The fifth chapter discusses the protection of the rights of legal bearer. Mainly discussed the bill loss relief and bill infringement relief. This paper discusses the protection of the rights of the relative loss and absolute loss of the bill in the relief of bill loss, and discusses the relief problem on the occasion of the forgery of the ticket and the forgery of endorsement in the relief of the infringement of the bill.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.287

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王雪瑩;淺析票據(jù)法對形式正義的追求[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年11期

2 孫椺;淺論我國票據(jù)法中正當(dāng)持票人制度[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年06期

3 王艷梅;;票據(jù)效力確認(rèn)的起源、原則與外在表達(dá)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2012年06期

4 吳在勤;論英美合同法中的對價[J];法學(xué)評論;1992年03期

5 汪世虎;論票據(jù)行為的無因性[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2003年03期

6 錢玉林;論票據(jù)權(quán)利的善意取得[J];淮陰師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1999年04期

7 呂來明;票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得的適用[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年05期

8 于永芹;試析我國票據(jù)對價制度[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年06期

9 劉承韙;;英美合同法中對價原則之功能分析[J];中外法學(xué);2006年05期

10 劉承韙;;契約法理論的歷史嬗迭與現(xiàn)代發(fā)展 以英美契約法為核心的考察[J];中外法學(xué);2011年04期

本文編號：1983999