本文選題：總部遷移 + 目標(biāo)區(qū)位選擇　； 參考：《浙江工商大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：2000年以來(lái),內(nèi)外部環(huán)境的持續(xù)變化,加劇了獨(dú)立區(qū)位總部與所在區(qū)位的沖突,掀起了總部遷移浪潮。在總部遷移情境下,現(xiàn)有研究主要關(guān)注了區(qū)域?qū)用娴钠髽I(yè)集聚優(yōu)勢(shì)及其可得性對(duì)企業(yè)總部遷移目標(biāo)區(qū)位選擇和遷移績(jī)效的影響。這些研究解釋了現(xiàn)實(shí)中企業(yè)總部遷往國(guó)內(nèi)少數(shù)大中型城市的現(xiàn)象,但是對(duì)于總部遷移背后制度性因素的影響缺乏關(guān)注,特別是無(wú)法解釋現(xiàn)實(shí)中存在的遷移多指向現(xiàn)象;此外,部分學(xué)者雖然已經(jīng)開始研究遷移績(jī)效,但對(duì)總部遷移績(jī)效的影響因素及其作用機(jī)理的關(guān)注還相對(duì)較少,同時(shí)缺乏對(duì)遷移過(guò)程中各階段之間關(guān)聯(lián)性的關(guān)注。因此,本研究從經(jīng)濟(jì)和制度融合的視角,分析企業(yè)總部遷移目標(biāo)區(qū)位選擇的影響因素及區(qū)位選擇模式對(duì)總部遷移績(jī)效的影響,以期更加全面的解構(gòu)中國(guó)企業(yè)總部遷移的整體圖景。本文研究共分為兩個(gè)階段。一方面,本文借鑒制度學(xué)派有關(guān)政治能力的研究成果,提出了總部遷移區(qū)位選擇的政治關(guān)聯(lián)利用邏輯,認(rèn)為企業(yè)依托其政治能力而形成的企業(yè)-區(qū)位政治關(guān)聯(lián)影響了遷移區(qū)位選擇,并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出集聚優(yōu)勢(shì)獲取邏輯與政治關(guān)聯(lián)利用邏輯的替代效應(yīng)。另一方面,通過(guò)梳理總部遷移研究相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),并結(jié)合上個(gè)階段總部遷移區(qū)位選擇研究得出的結(jié)論,構(gòu)建了總部遷移績(jī)效影響因素模型,并利用2001-2014年中國(guó)上市公司總部遷移樣本進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析,主要得出如下結(jié)論:第一,總部遷移目標(biāo)區(qū)位選擇的集聚優(yōu)勢(shì)獲取邏輯和政治能力利用邏輯均得到證實(shí),即總部集聚優(yōu)勢(shì)是企業(yè)總部遷移目標(biāo)區(qū)位選擇的顯著因素,現(xiàn)實(shí)中企業(yè)總部更傾向于遷往區(qū)位總部集聚優(yōu)勢(shì)更好的區(qū)位以實(shí)現(xiàn)總部運(yùn)營(yíng)效率的提高;基于政治能力的企業(yè)-區(qū)位政治關(guān)聯(lián)是總部遷移目標(biāo)區(qū)位選擇的另一個(gè)顯著因素,現(xiàn)實(shí)中企業(yè)總部更傾向于選擇企業(yè)-區(qū)位政治關(guān)聯(lián)強(qiáng)度更高的區(qū)位。第二,集聚優(yōu)勢(shì)獲取邏輯與政治能力利用邏輯的替代效應(yīng)得到證實(shí),即總部集聚優(yōu)勢(shì)跨度與企業(yè)-區(qū)位政治關(guān)聯(lián)對(duì)總部遷移目標(biāo)區(qū)位選擇存在顯著負(fù)向交互效應(yīng)。而正是這種替代效應(yīng)使得總部遷移指向呈現(xiàn)出顯著的多指向特征。第三,對(duì)于總部遷移績(jī)效,遷入地區(qū)位優(yōu)勢(shì)獲取邏輯得到證實(shí),即遷入地區(qū)位優(yōu)勢(shì)跨度是影響企業(yè)總部遷移績(jī)效的重要因素。同時(shí),政治能力利用邏輯得到證實(shí),即遷入地企業(yè)-政治關(guān)聯(lián)是影響企業(yè)總部遷移績(jī)效的重要因素。企業(yè)-區(qū)位政治關(guān)聯(lián)作為一種非正式制度,不僅可以推動(dòng)企業(yè)成功嵌入當(dāng)?shù)貐^(qū)域網(wǎng)絡(luò),獲取區(qū)域核心資源優(yōu)勢(shì),而且可以作為企業(yè)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)營(yíng)戰(zhàn)略的替代者為企業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的順利實(shí)施保駕護(hù)航。第四,對(duì)于總部區(qū)位選擇對(duì)企業(yè)績(jī)效的影響,研究發(fā)現(xiàn)位于企業(yè)-區(qū)位匹配模式(A-P)區(qū)位的企業(yè)總部績(jī)效更優(yōu),即企業(yè)總部遷移目標(biāo)區(qū)位選擇模式是影響企業(yè)總部遷移績(jī)效的重要因素。本文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上和相關(guān)理論的指導(dǎo)下,初步解釋了現(xiàn)實(shí)中總部遷移多指向現(xiàn)象;并在此基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)一步分析了企業(yè)總部基于企業(yè)-區(qū)位匹配模式(A-P)的選擇對(duì)遷移后企業(yè)績(jī)效的影響。但是,由于研究條件和本人研究能力的不足,本文也存在不足之處,主要表現(xiàn)為樣本類型和實(shí)證方法相對(duì)單一;實(shí)證結(jié)論的外部效度有待進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證;總部遷移績(jī)效的度量指標(biāo)可以更加豐富和精確化,以上不足也指出了未來(lái)的研究方向。
[Abstract]:Since 2000, the continuous changes in the internal and external environment have intensified the conflict between the independent location headquarters and the location, and set off a wave of headquarters migration. In the context of the headquarters migration, the existing research mainly focuses on the influence of the regional level of enterprise agglomeration advantage and its availability on the location selection and transfer performance of the enterprise headquarters relocation target. It explains the phenomenon that the enterprise headquarters moved to a small number of large and medium-sized cities in China, but it does not pay attention to the influence of the institutional factors behind the headquarters migration, especially it can not explain the multi orientation phenomenon in the reality. In addition, some scholars have begun to study the performance of migration, but the influence factors on the performance of the headquarters migration There are relatively few concerns about its mechanism and lack of attention to the relevance between the various stages of the migration process. Therefore, from the perspective of economic and institutional integration, this study analyzes the influence factors of the location selection of the relocation target of the enterprise headquarters and the influence of the location selection model on the performance of the headquarters relocation, with a view to a more comprehensive deconstruction of China. The overall picture of the migration of the enterprise headquarters is divided into two stages. On the one hand, this paper draws on the research results of the political ability of the institutional school, and puts forward the political association logic of the location selection of the headquarters migration, and thinks that the enterprise location political connection, which is formed by the enterprise's political ability, affects the location selection of the migration. On the basis of this, we put forward the substitution effect of gathering advantage to obtain logic and political relevance using logic. On the other hand, by combing the relevant literature of the study of the headquarters migration and combining the conclusions of the location selection of the headquarters migration at the last stage, the influence factor model of the headquarters relocation performance is constructed, and the total number of Chinese Listed Companies in 2001-2014 years is used. The empirical analysis of the migration samples is carried out, and the main conclusions are as follows: firstly, the logical and political ability use logic of the location selection of the headquarters relocation target is confirmed. That is, the headquarters agglomeration advantage is the significant factor of the location selection of the relocation target of the enterprise headquarters. In reality, the enterprise headquarters is more inclined to move to the location headquarters. The advantages and better location to improve the efficiency of the headquarters operation; the political ability based enterprise location political association is another significant factor of the location selection of the headquarters relocation target. In reality, the enterprise headquarters is more inclined to choose the higher location of the enterprise location political correlation. Second, the agglomeration advantage obtains the logical and political ability. It is proved by the substitution effect of logic that there is a significant negative interaction effect between the headquarters agglomeration advantage span and the enterprise location political association on the location selection of the headquarters relocation target. And it is this substitution effect that makes the headquarters relocation point showing a significant number of directional characteristics. Third, to the headquarters migration performance and to the regional advantage. The acquisition logic has proved that the moving into the regional advantage span is an important factor affecting the performance of the enterprise headquarters migration. At the same time, the logic of the use of political ability confirms that the moving in enterprise political connection is an important factor affecting the performance of the enterprise headquarters. As an informal system, the enterprise location political association can not only be promoted. The enterprise successfully embedded the local regional network to obtain the regional core resources advantage, and can be used as the substitute for the enterprise market management strategy for the smooth implementation of the enterprise development strategy. Fourth, for the impact of the headquarters location selection on the enterprise performance, the study found the enterprise headquarters performance in the enterprise location matching model (A-P) location. The effect is better, that is, the location selection model of the enterprise headquarters relocation target is an important factor affecting the performance of the enterprise headquarters migration. On the basis of previous research and the guidance of relevant theories, this paper explains the multi direction phenomenon of the headquarters relocation in reality; and on this basis, it further analyzes the enterprise headquarters based on the enterprise location matching model (A The choice of -P) affects the performance of the enterprise after the migration. However, because of the lack of research conditions and the lack of my research ability, this paper also has some shortcomings, mainly showing that the sample type and the empirical method are relatively simple; the external validity of the empirical conclusions should be further verified; the measurement indexes of the headquarters relocation performance can be more abundant and precise, The above deficiencies also point out the future research direction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D0;F832.51;F279.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 段小梅;;臺(tái)商投資大陸區(qū)位選擇的實(shí)證研究[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2006年04期

2 汪建新;;基于產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的區(qū)位選擇研究——以上海為例[J];理論與改革;2009年02期

3 萬(wàn)意;試論小城鎮(zhèn)建設(shè)的區(qū)位選擇[J];理論與改革;1996年09期

4 姚書杰;;臺(tái)商投資大陸區(qū)位選擇、產(chǎn)業(yè)布局與政策實(shí)施機(jī)制實(shí)證研究[J];安徽行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

5 黃慶,陳賢德,熊奇,廖金紅;論我國(guó)企業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資的區(qū)位選擇[J];湖南行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

6 陳昊;官仁軍;;論中國(guó)民營(yíng)企業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資的區(qū)位選擇[J];紅旗文稿;2007年09期

7 田鳳岐;;區(qū)位選擇理論綜述[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年12期

8 陽(yáng)艷;;試論中國(guó)企業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資區(qū)位選擇[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2012年01期

9 伍笛笛;戴賓;;產(chǎn)品生命周期與企業(yè)區(qū)位選擇[J];成都行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

10 胡少東;;區(qū)域制度環(huán)境與臺(tái)商投資大陸區(qū)位選擇[J];臺(tái)灣研究集刊;2010年05期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前8條

1 張?jiān)埔?曾剛;;上海高校衍生企業(yè)的區(qū)位選擇研究[A];中國(guó)地理學(xué)會(huì)2007年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文摘要集[C];2007年

2 白光潤(rùn);;論微區(qū)位[A];認(rèn)識(shí)地理過(guò)程 關(guān)注人類家園——中國(guó)地理學(xué)會(huì)2003年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)文集[C];2003年

3 趙儒煜;劉靜;;論創(chuàng)新對(duì)企業(yè)區(qū)位選擇的作用機(jī)制[A];全國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)地理研究會(huì)第十二屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)暨“全球化與中國(guó)區(qū)域發(fā)展”研討會(huì)論文集[C];2008年

4 寧南;王亭;王榮;;制度距離對(duì)我國(guó)OFDI區(qū)位選擇的影響——基于58個(gè)國(guó)家(地區(qū))面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證研究[A];第八屆（2013）中國(guó)管理學(xué)年會(huì)——組織與戰(zhàn)略分會(huì)場(chǎng)論文集[C];2013年

5 劉勝軍;鄭雪;;跨國(guó)公司FDI區(qū)位選擇與投資環(huán)境的關(guān)聯(lián)分析[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)財(cái)務(wù)成本分會(huì)2011年年會(huì)暨第二十四次理論研討會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

6 唐禮智;狄e，

本文編號(hào)：1938160