本文選題：房地產(chǎn)投資信托 + 法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)��； 參考：《江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：房地產(chǎn)投資信托是現(xiàn)代金融領(lǐng)域的重要組成部分,在銀根緊縮,貸款政策愈加嚴(yán)格的情況下,信托作為新興融資方式為房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)提供了充裕的資金支持,并且也給投資人、受益人提供高回報(bào)的投資渠道。我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)信托投資業(yè)務(wù)的出現(xiàn)只有短短十年,且以《信托法》、《信托公司管理辦法》、《信托公司集合資金信托計(jì)劃管理辦法》——“一法兩規(guī)”為主要監(jiān)管法律制度。但是在房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)信托融資的實(shí)務(wù)當(dāng)中,違規(guī)現(xiàn)象頻繁。一方面,由于已有的部門法規(guī)較為寬泛,存在頗多法律規(guī)定空白讓不法分子有可乘之機(jī)；第二方面,在全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的影響下,我國(guó)的房地產(chǎn)信托融資業(yè)務(wù)雖然處于起步期,但是資金規(guī)模較大,運(yùn)營(yíng)復(fù)雜,而我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的“一法兩規(guī)”已經(jīng)跟不上行業(yè)發(fā)展的快節(jié)奏,立法水平落后,亟需向美英日德等信托發(fā)展歷史更長(zhǎng),監(jiān)管體系更為完善的國(guó)家學(xué)習(xí)。 信托制度是一項(xiàng)偉大的創(chuàng)造,創(chuàng)造伊始成功規(guī)避僵化法律規(guī)定與封建統(tǒng)治者的剝削。但是我國(guó)關(guān)于信托財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)含糊不清的規(guī)定無(wú)疑閹割了信托最具創(chuàng)意的雙重所有權(quán)設(shè)計(jì)。房地產(chǎn)信托業(yè)務(wù)中涉及的信托財(cái)產(chǎn)的內(nèi)容多為：商業(yè)中心、住宅樓盤、保障住房等,若在建設(shè)過(guò)程出現(xiàn)問(wèn)題,無(wú)法如約實(shí)現(xiàn)信托約定進(jìn)行清算時(shí)還會(huì)出現(xiàn)：在建工程、土地使用權(quán)等不動(dòng)產(chǎn)與相關(guān)權(quán)利。但是由于信托機(jī)構(gòu)并沒(méi)有取得財(cái)產(chǎn)的所有權(quán),所以在對(duì)項(xiàng)目建設(shè)時(shí)并無(wú)法真正參與到運(yùn)營(yíng)決策與全盤監(jiān)督的過(guò)程中。實(shí)務(wù)中設(shè)立房地產(chǎn)信托,信托公司與房產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)企業(yè)會(huì)在在建工程、土地使用權(quán)上設(shè)置擔(dān)保,如果出現(xiàn)需要實(shí)現(xiàn)擔(dān)保債權(quán)的情況,信托公司會(huì)因?yàn)闆](méi)有所有權(quán)而有所掣肘。關(guān)于信托財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)的規(guī)定有待進(jìn)一步厘清�，F(xiàn)有法規(guī)對(duì)信托合同份數(shù)予以一刀切的規(guī)定,亦無(wú)法滿足現(xiàn)在房地產(chǎn)建設(shè)融資動(dòng)輒千萬(wàn)上億的資金需求。實(shí)務(wù)當(dāng)中,一些信托機(jī)構(gòu)往往會(huì)試圖通過(guò)拆分項(xiàng)目來(lái)規(guī)避該規(guī)定,從而又會(huì)產(chǎn)生可能導(dǎo)致項(xiàng)目無(wú)效的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。同時(shí),缺乏專業(yè)監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)也給房地產(chǎn)信托業(yè)務(wù)的引導(dǎo)與監(jiān)管工作帶來(lái)壓力,籌建信托監(jiān)管委員會(huì)能夠提供更加專業(yè)、高效的監(jiān)管,引導(dǎo)該行業(yè)更好的發(fā)展。 筆者針對(duì)我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)投資信托中多發(fā)法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的原因予以分析,參考成熟的行業(yè)監(jiān)管法規(guī)與機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置,探索完善房地產(chǎn)投資信托法律監(jiān)管的具體方法——首先,從建立專業(yè)信托監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)——信托監(jiān)管委員會(huì)；其次,樹立正確的立法價(jià)值取向——兼顧安全與效率,減少現(xiàn)有法規(guī)沖突與填補(bǔ)立法漏洞；再次,通過(guò)培養(yǎng)提高監(jiān)管人員的專業(yè)素質(zhì)；最后,完善信托財(cái)產(chǎn)為中心的信息披露制度。
[Abstract]:Real estate investment trust is an important part of the modern financial field. Under the circumstances of tight monetary resources and tighter loan policy, the trust, as a new financing method, provides abundant financial support for real estate development and also gives investors. Beneficiaries provide high return investment channels. The appearance of real estate trust investment business in our country is only ten years, and the main supervision legal system is "Trust Law", "Trust Company Management method", "Trust Company Collective funds Trust Plan Management method"-"one Law and two rules". But in the real estate development trust financing practice, the violation phenomenon is frequent. On the one hand, due to the wide range of existing departmental laws and regulations, there are quite a lot of gaps in laws and regulations that allow lawbreakers to take advantage of the opportunities. Second, under the influence of global economic integration, the real estate trust financing business in China is in its infancy. However, the scale of capital is large and the operation is complicated. However, the existing "one law and two rules" in our country can no longer keep up with the fast pace of industry development and the level of legislation is backward. Therefore, the history of developing trust such as the United States, Britain, Japan and Germany is urgently needed to be longer. Countries with better regulatory systems learn. Trust system is a great creation, which successfully evaded rigid legal regulations and exploitation of feudal rulers at the beginning of creation. However, the ambiguous provisions on the ownership of trust property undoubtedly castrate the most creative dual ownership design of trust. The contents of the trust property involved in the real estate trust business are mostly: commercial center, residential real estate, security housing and so on. If there is a problem in the construction process, the settlement of the trust agreement cannot be fulfilled as agreed by the trust. Land use right and other real estate and related rights. However, because the trust organization has not acquired the ownership of the property, it is unable to participate in the process of operation decision and overall supervision in the construction of the project. In practice, the real estate trust company and the real estate development company will set up the guarantee on the construction project and the land use right. If there is a need to realize the secured creditor's rights, the trust company will be constrained by the lack of ownership. The provisions on the ownership of trust property need to be further clarified. The existing regulations on the number of trust contracts to provide a one-size-fits-all provision, also can not meet the current real estate construction financing needs of tens of millions of dollars. In practice, some trust agencies often try to break up the project to avoid the regulation, which may lead to the project invalid risk. At the same time, the lack of professional regulatory agencies also brings pressure to the guidance and supervision of the real estate trust business. The preparation of the trust supervision committee can provide more professional, efficient supervision and guide the better development of the industry. The author analyzes the causes of multiple legal risks in real estate investment trusts in China, and explores the specific methods to perfect the legal supervision of real estate investment trusts by referring to the mature industry regulations and institutional settings. From the establishment of professional trust regulatory body-trust supervision committee; secondly, set up the correct legislative value orientation-to take into account safety and efficiency, reduce the existing laws and regulations conflict and fill legislative loopholes; third, Finally, improve the information disclosure system with trust property as the center.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.282

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王偉;;試析蘇聯(lián)《銀行與銀行活動(dòng)法》[J];今日蘇聯(lián)東歐;1991年06期

2 ;吉林省人民政府辦公廳轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)省工商銀行《關(guān)于積極開(kāi)展信托業(yè)務(wù)廣泛籌集資金支持技術(shù)改造的報(bào)告》的通知[J];吉林政報(bào);1984年24期

3 陳啟明;淺談中國(guó)金融業(yè)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2001年10期

4 蓋永光;加快信托公司的改革與發(fā)展[J];發(fā)展論壇;2003年05期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 許東升;楊有禮;;商業(yè)銀行家族信托業(yè)務(wù)的法律問(wèn)題研究——基于對(duì)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家(地區(qū))家族信托業(yè)務(wù)的借鑒和思考[A];金融法學(xué)家（第五輯）[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 姜濤;江蘇六項(xiàng)舉措規(guī)范異地集合信托業(yè)務(wù)[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2007年

2 大連專員辦;信托業(yè)務(wù)檢查初探[N];中國(guó)財(cái)經(jīng)報(bào);2012年

3 肖懷洋;信托業(yè)務(wù)放開(kāi)考驗(yàn)監(jiān)管的協(xié)調(diào)統(tǒng)一[N];證券日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

4 本報(bào)記者 杜雅文;家族信托業(yè)務(wù)短期尚難成熟[N];中國(guó)證券報(bào);2013年

5 記者 張菲菲;信托業(yè)務(wù)青黃不接 三季度凈利環(huán)比負(fù)增長(zhǎng)[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

6 蘆玲;信托業(yè)務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)核算不再一頭霧水[N];中國(guó)財(cái)經(jīng)報(bào);2005年

7 孫來(lái);金融信托業(yè)務(wù)品種開(kāi)發(fā)設(shè)計(jì)研討會(huì)將辦[N];金融時(shí)報(bào);2002年

8 證券時(shí)報(bào)記者 張偉霖;信托業(yè)務(wù)“二八定律”逐步顯現(xiàn)[N];證券時(shí)報(bào);2010年

9 本報(bào)記者 徐天曉;信托業(yè)務(wù)扮靚中報(bào) 愛(ài)建股份上半年凈利同比翻番[N];證券日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

10 記者 齊聞潮;我國(guó)首個(gè)信托業(yè)務(wù)信息服務(wù)系統(tǒng)上線[N];金融時(shí)報(bào);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 費(fèi)揚(yáng);基于案例剖析的中國(guó)信托業(yè)務(wù)模式研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2012年

2 閻曉納;西安國(guó)際信托有限公司信托業(yè)務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[D];西北大學(xué);2009年

3 賴錦華;房地產(chǎn)信托業(yè)務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

4 黨宏亮;甘肅信托有限責(zé)任公司信托業(yè)務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理改進(jìn)研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2014年

5 倪馨;我國(guó)信托業(yè)的發(fā)展研究[D];東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2001年

6 饒婷婷;A信托公司證券信托業(yè)務(wù)模式創(chuàng)新研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

7 田宏;新時(shí)代信托股份有限公司信托業(yè)務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

8 陽(yáng)瑾;房地產(chǎn)信托業(yè)務(wù)法律問(wèn)題研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

9 王同順;我國(guó)開(kāi)展壽險(xiǎn)信托業(yè)務(wù)的法律思考[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2012年

10 胡宇吉;我國(guó)銀信合作形式的發(fā)展策略研究[D];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1895927