發(fā)布時間：2018-05-07 19:45

  本文選題：證券定義 + 證券品種��； 參考：《政治與法律》2017年02期

【摘要】：在我國《證券法》的修改過程中,需冷靜地思考證券定義擴大的節(jié)奏與具體內(nèi)容的把握。通過對我國證券市場的歷史性觀察可以發(fā)現(xiàn),我國法上的證券定義的作用主要在于為社會提供合法、明確、可得的證券投融資渠道,避免非法集資者,這與美國法上的證券定義演繹過程有重大的區(qū)別。各國法上的證券定義與各自監(jiān)管立場、目標和社會制度密切相關(guān),不能輕易而盲目地進行制度移植。在我國當今語境下,我國《證券法》對證券定義的擴展仍然在于為社會提供創(chuàng)新的融資手段,而非為種類繁多、自由創(chuàng)新的任何證券產(chǎn)品提供兜底性的監(jiān)管。因此,我國《證券法》上的證券定義不宜過寬,更不能擴展至"投資合同",而應(yīng)循序漸進地處理好具體的股權(quán)類和債務(wù)類證券產(chǎn)品范圍,審慎把握證券定義擴大進程。
[Abstract]:In the course of amending the Securities Law of our country, it is necessary to think calmly about the rhythm of the expansion of the definition of securities and the grasp of the concrete contents. Through the historical observation of China's securities market, we can find that the role of the definition of securities in our country's law is mainly to provide legal, clear and available channels for securities investment and financing for the society, so as to avoid those who raise funds illegally. This differs greatly from the deductive process of securities definition in American law. The definition of securities in various countries is closely related to their respective regulatory positions, objectives and social systems, and can not be transplanted easily and blindly. In the present context of our country, the extension of the definition of securities in China's Securities Law still lies in the provision of innovative financing means for the society, not in the provision of bottom supervision for any securities product of various kinds and free innovation. Therefore, the definition of securities in our country's Securities Law should not be too broad, nor can it be extended to "investment contract". Instead, we should deal with the specific product range of equity and debt securities step by step, and carefully grasp the process of expanding the definition of securities.
【作者單位】： 深圳大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D922.287
，

本文編號：1858221