本文選題：證券市場(chǎng) + 虛假陳述�。� 參考：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》2017年02期

【摘要】：目前,我國(guó)已初步建立證券欺詐糾紛解決的法律框架。根據(jù)對(duì)證券市場(chǎng)虛假陳述案件的行政處罰和民事訴訟案件數(shù)量的統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,我國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)的虛假陳述行為總體上呈遞增趨勢(shì),而相關(guān)的民事訴訟案件數(shù)量卻沒有呈現(xiàn)同比例增長(zhǎng)。故將法律規(guī)制的影響內(nèi)嵌于投資者和侵權(quán)人對(duì)于訴訟的預(yù)期之中,以成本—收益法權(quán)衡投資者和侵權(quán)人的預(yù)期凈收益,根據(jù)不完全信息動(dòng)態(tài)博弈模型,分析證券虛假陳述民事糾紛主體的行為對(duì)策。虛假陳述行為人的侵權(quán)行為是一個(gè)利益權(quán)衡過程,從法律規(guī)制的角度提高侵權(quán)人的預(yù)期違法成本支付是一個(gè)必然的路徑。
[Abstract]:At present, China has initially established a legal framework for resolving securities fraud disputes.According to the statistics and analysis of the administrative punishment and the number of civil litigation cases of the misrepresentation cases in the securities market, the misrepresentation behavior of the securities market in our country generally shows an increasing trend.However, the number of related civil cases has not increased in the same proportion.Therefore, the influence of legal regulation is embedded in the expectation of litigation by investors and infringers, and the expected net income of investors and infringers is weighed by cost-income method, and the dynamic game model of incomplete information is used.This paper analyzes the behavior countermeasures of the civil dispute subject of securities misrepresentation.The tortious behavior of the perpetrator of false statement is a process of balancing interests. It is an inevitable way to increase the expected illegal cost payment of the infringer from the angle of legal regulation.
【作者單位】： 上海財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D922.287

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 司登殿,王映霞;證券市場(chǎng)發(fā)展趨勢(shì)與管理創(chuàng)新[J];發(fā)展論壇;2000年02期

2 何躍中;對(duì)我國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)若干管理問題的思考[J];理論界;2000年03期

3 唐鵬琪;中印證券市場(chǎng)的比較分析[J];南亞研究季刊;2000年04期

4 張文魁;開放式基金對(duì)證券市場(chǎng)的影響[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號(hào)：1733175