本文關鍵詞： 票據(jù) 善意取得 票據(jù)流通性　出處：《廈門大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：票據(jù)作為商事交易發(fā)展的產(chǎn)物,適應規(guī)模化交易所需的效率與便捷。票據(jù)是一種完全的有價證券,票據(jù)權(quán)利與票據(jù)占有不可分割,票據(jù)權(quán)利的行使以票據(jù)為基礎,只有持票人向票據(jù)付款人提示票據(jù)才能受領票據(jù)金額,票據(jù)權(quán)利的行使與票據(jù)的持有不可分割。這使得票據(jù)的善意取得顯得尤為必要。 動產(chǎn)的善意取得發(fā)展于日耳曼法的“以手護手”原則,各國民法多有涉及,無論是立法發(fā)展情況還是學術(shù)研究都很成熟。票據(jù)雖然是動產(chǎn)的一種,但票據(jù)自身的一些特點與性質(zhì)決定了票據(jù)權(quán)利不同于一般的動產(chǎn)權(quán)利,那么它的善意取得是否可以直接援引一般動產(chǎn)善意取得來適用?本文著重討論票據(jù)適用善意取得的正當性以及就該正當性作出引申。 全文在考量民法善意取得制度設計的基礎上,從票據(jù)自有性質(zhì)出發(fā),以追求票據(jù)流通發(fā)揮票據(jù)應有功能為主線、以票據(jù)基本性質(zhì)為支撐、以票據(jù)價值取向為目標,從票據(jù)善意取得的可能性和必要性兩方面來分析出票據(jù)善意取得的正當性。 本文第一章對一般動產(chǎn)善意取得的淵源、概念、成立要件、立法價值進行概述,并由此引申出票據(jù)的善意取得。 本文第二章進行票據(jù)善意取得的可能性分析,即分析善意取得為何能夠適用于票據(jù)領域�？赡苄苑治鲋饕獜膬煞矫鎭磉M行：一是討論票據(jù)善意取得的經(jīng)驗基礎,即既有的成功先例；二是從票據(jù)的基本性質(zhì)角度出發(fā),分析票據(jù)的有價證券性質(zhì)、流通性等,說明可能性的邏輯根基。 本文第三章進行票據(jù)善意取得的必要性分析,即分析善意取得在票據(jù)上的適用是一種邏輯必然。必要性分析的主線是商法價值取向與基本原則,第一節(jié)將概括說明這種必要性是商法價值及原則的內(nèi)在要求,第二節(jié)將商法價值取向與基本原則具體細化,從交易效益與交易安全兩方面出發(fā),說明必要性乃市場交易的內(nèi)在要求。 本文第四章將票據(jù)善意取得正當性的進一步引申,著重討論我國票據(jù)善意取得制度的現(xiàn)實狀況,并給予啟示與建議。
[Abstract]:As the product of the development of commercial transaction, bill is an efficient and convenient way to meet the needs of large-scale transaction. Bill is a kind of completely marketable securities, and the right of bill is inseparable from the possession of bill, and the exercise of bill right is based on bill. Only when the bearer prompts the bill to the drawee can he receive the amount of the bill, and the exercise of the right to the bill is inseparable from the holding of the bill, which makes the bona fide acquisition of the bill particularly necessary. The bona fide acquisition of movable property is developed from the principle of "protecting hands by hand" in Germanic law, which is mostly involved in civil law of various countries, both in terms of legislative development and academic research. Bill is a kind of movable property. However, some characteristics and nature of the instrument itself determine that the bill right is different from the ordinary movable property right, so can its bona fide acquisition be applied directly by invoking the ordinary movable property bona fide acquisition? This paper focuses on the legitimacy of bona fide acquisition and its extension. On the basis of considering the design of bona fide acquisition system in civil law, starting from the nature of the bill, the main line of the paper is to pursue the negotiable instrument circulation to play its due function, to support the basic nature of the bill, and to take the value orientation of the bill as the goal. The legitimacy of bona fide acquisition of bill is analyzed from two aspects: possibility and necessity of bona fide acquisition of bill. The first chapter summarizes the origin, concept, essential elements and legislative value of bona fide acquisition of ordinary movable property, and derives from it the bona fide acquisition of bills. The second chapter is to analyze the possibility of bona fide acquisition of negotiable instruments, that is, to analyze why bona fide acquisition can be applied to the field of bill. The possibility analysis is mainly carried out from two aspects: one is to discuss the empirical basis of bona fide acquisition of bills. The second is to analyze the nature and circulation of negotiable securities from the point of view of the basic nature of the bill, to explain the logical basis of the possibility. The third chapter analyzes the necessity of bona fide acquisition of negotiable instruments, that is to say, it is a logical necessity to analyze the application of bona fide acquisition in bills. The main line of necessity analysis is the value orientation and basic principles of commercial law. The first section will generalize that this necessity is the intrinsic requirement of the commercial law value and principle, the second section will detail the commercial law value orientation and the basic principle, from the transaction benefit and the transaction security two aspects, The necessity is the inherent requirement of market transaction. In Chapter 4th, the author further extends the legitimacy of bona fide acquisition of bills, and discusses the current situation of bona fide acquisition of bills in China, and gives some enlightenment and suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：廈門大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.287

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉定華,譚丹;論票據(jù)的善意取得[J];長沙電力學院學報(社會科學版);2001年04期

2 李偉群;;除權(quán)判決的效力與票據(jù)善意取得之間的關系——從中、日票據(jù)法比較的角度[J];法學;2006年06期

3 王果;;票據(jù)外觀性之理論初探[J];法制與社會;2008年04期

4 于瑩;論票據(jù)的無因性原則及其相對性——票據(jù)無因性原則“射程距離”之思考[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2003年04期

5 祁群;票據(jù)善意取得制度的起源與發(fā)展研究[J];上海金融學院學報;2004年01期

6 呂來明;票據(jù)權(quán)利善意取得的適用[J];法學研究;1998年05期

7 門獻敏;;審判實踐中票據(jù)權(quán)利的善意取得[J];求索;2007年01期

8 趙萬一;論民商法價值取向的異同及其對我國民商立法的影響[J];法學論壇;2003年06期

9 何本華;;公信力和善意取得制度對交易安全公平的保護分析[J];社會科學論壇;2005年03期

10 張秀全;商法基本原則研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學;1999年05期

，

本文編號：1499849