發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-18 10:57

【摘要】： 2007年9月12號(hào)證監(jiān)會(huì)發(fā)文取消了B股市場(chǎng)雙重審計(jì)的強(qiáng)制性,從1996年B股雙重審計(jì)開(kāi)始執(zhí)行到今年的取消已經(jīng)有十一年的時(shí)間,因此:(1)雙重審計(jì)不僅存在單一審計(jì)存在的問(wèn)題,而且還存在雙重審計(jì)的特有問(wèn)題值得深入研究,這些問(wèn)題可能直接關(guān)系到雙重審計(jì)未來(lái)發(fā)展;(2)有必要對(duì)雙重審計(jì)模式的發(fā)展做一些回顧與總結(jié)�；谝陨蟽牲c(diǎn),本文將主要探討雙重審計(jì)下的審計(jì)師與被審計(jì)單位、審計(jì)師與審計(jì)師之間形成的多重關(guān)系,以及這種關(guān)系對(duì)與上市公司高質(zhì)量的審計(jì)需求和對(duì)審計(jì)師選擇的影響。 本文以2004、2005和2006年三年同時(shí)發(fā)行A、B股上市公司及其A、B股審計(jì)師為研究樣本,考察了上市公司境外投資者持股、境外董事,A股審計(jì)師選聘等因素對(duì)B股審計(jì)師選聘影響,以及A、B股高質(zhì)量審計(jì)師對(duì)總審計(jì)費(fèi)用的影響。在控制了公司規(guī)模、財(cái)務(wù)杠桿、盈利能力、審計(jì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、審計(jì)意見(jiàn)以及其他因素以后,發(fā)現(xiàn):首先,境外投資者的持股與B股高質(zhì)量審計(jì)師之間呈倒U形結(jié)構(gòu);其次,董事會(huì)中外籍董事比例很低,對(duì)高質(zhì)量B股審計(jì)需求不明顯;上市公司在選擇了A股高質(zhì)量審計(jì)師后,表現(xiàn)出對(duì)B股高質(zhì)量審計(jì)師需求明顯不足,同時(shí),在向A股審計(jì)師支付了高額審計(jì)費(fèi)用后,也不傾向再為B股審計(jì)師支付高額審計(jì)費(fèi)用;在B股審計(jì)市場(chǎng)上,高質(zhì)量的審計(jì)師更傾向于以審計(jì)集團(tuán)的形式來(lái)獲得同一家上市公司的A、B股年報(bào)審計(jì)項(xiàng)目;最后檢驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn)了A、B股高質(zhì)量的審計(jì)師會(huì)導(dǎo)致上市公司總的審計(jì)費(fèi)用的增加。 本文共分五章:第一章為緒論部分;第二章主要分析了B股市場(chǎng)雙重審計(jì)的政策革沿、B股市場(chǎng)雙重審計(jì)的市場(chǎng)現(xiàn)狀等,同時(shí)分析了A股補(bǔ)充審計(jì)的政策沿革,并對(duì)B股市場(chǎng)雙重審計(jì)和A股的補(bǔ)充審計(jì)做了對(duì)比分析,對(duì)雙重審計(jì)下審計(jì)關(guān)系異化和審計(jì)集團(tuán)現(xiàn)象做了論述,還對(duì)B股雙重審計(jì)強(qiáng)制性取消的時(shí)機(jī)做了簡(jiǎn)單分析,進(jìn)一步對(duì)強(qiáng)制性取消后對(duì)我國(guó)證券審計(jì)市場(chǎng)的影響做了說(shuō)明;第三章首先實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)了B股市場(chǎng)雙重審計(jì)下的審計(jì)需求和審計(jì)師選擇情況,以及高質(zhì)量審計(jì)師與審計(jì)集團(tuán)的關(guān)系;第四章對(duì)高質(zhì)量審計(jì)師和總審計(jì)費(fèi)用的關(guān)系做了實(shí)證檢驗(yàn);第五章總結(jié)了研究的主要結(jié)論,提出了一些關(guān)于雙重審計(jì)模式發(fā)展政策建議,并對(duì)雙重審計(jì)的未來(lái)研究方向做了一些理論預(yù)期。
[Abstract]:On September 12, 2007, the Securities Regulatory Commission issued a letter canceling the mandatory double audit of the B-share market. It has been 11 years since the implementation of the double audit of B-share in 1996 to the cancellation of this year. Therefore: (1) there are not only the problems of single audit, but also the unique problems of dual audit, which may be directly related to the future development of dual audit; (2) it is necessary to review and summarize the development of dual audit mode. Based on the above two points, this paper will mainly discuss the multiple relationships between auditors and audited units, auditors and auditors under dual audit. And the impact of this relationship on the high-quality audit demand and auditor selection of listed companies. In this paper, based on the sample of A, B shares listed companies and their auditors of A and B shares issued simultaneously in 2005 and 2006, this paper investigates the influence of foreign investors' shareholding, overseas directors and A share auditors on the selection and appointment of B shares auditors. And A, B shares of high-quality auditors on the overall audit costs. After controlling the company size, financial leverage, profitability, audit risk, audit opinion, and other factors, it is found that: first, there is an inverted U-shaped structure between foreign investors' holdings and high-quality B shares auditors; Secondly, the proportion of foreign directors in the board of directors is very low, and the demand for high quality B shares audit is not obvious. After selecting the high-quality auditors of A-shares, the listed companies show that the demand for high-quality auditors of B-shares is obviously insufficient. At the same time, after paying high audit fees to the auditors of A-shares, Nor do they tend to pay high audit fees for B shares auditors; In the B share audit market, high quality auditors tend to obtain the A-, B-share annual report audit items of the same listed company in the form of audit group. Finally, it is found that high quality auditors of A and B shares lead to the increase of total audit cost of listed companies. This paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter is the introduction part; The second chapter mainly analyzes the policy development of double auditing in B share market, the market status quo of double audit in B share market, and the policy evolution of A share supplementary audit. It also makes a comparative analysis of double audit of B share market and supplementary audit of A share, discusses the alienation of audit relationship and the phenomenon of audit group under double audit, and makes a brief analysis on the opportunity of mandatory cancellation of double audit of B share. Further explained the impact of mandatory cancellation on China's securities audit market; The third chapter empirically tests the audit demand and auditor selection under the double audit of B share market and the relationship between the high quality auditor and the audit group, the fourth chapter makes an empirical test on the relationship between the high quality auditor and the total audit cost. The fifth chapter summarizes the main conclusions of the study, puts forward some policy recommendations on the development of dual audit mode, and makes some theoretical expectations on the future research direction of dual audit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F832.51;F239.4;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳冬華;周春泉;;自選擇問(wèn)題對(duì)審計(jì)收費(fèi)的影響——來(lái)自中國(guó)上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2006年03期

2 周友梅;;論審計(jì)理論及其結(jié)構(gòu)[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2007年02期

3 蔣義宏;凈利潤(rùn)境內(nèi)外審計(jì)差異的實(shí)證分析——來(lái)自中國(guó)B股上市公司年報(bào)的證據(jù)[J];管理世界;2002年07期

4 韓厚軍,周生春;中國(guó)證券市場(chǎng)會(huì)計(jì)師報(bào)酬研究——上市公司實(shí)證數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];管理世界;2003年02期

5 劉峰,賀建剛,魏明海;控制權(quán)、業(yè)績(jī)與利益輸送——基于五糧液的案例研究[J];管理世界;2004年08期

6 王艷艷;陳漢文;于李勝;;代理沖突與高質(zhì)量審計(jì)需求——來(lái)自中國(guó)上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2006年02期

7 李東平,黃德華,王振林;“不清潔”審計(jì)意見(jiàn)、盈余管理與會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所變更[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2001年06期

8 劉峰,許菲;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向型審計(jì)·法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)·審計(jì)質(zhì)量──兼論“五大”在我國(guó)審計(jì)市場(chǎng)的行為[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2002年02期

9 劉峰,張立民,雷科羅;我國(guó)審計(jì)市場(chǎng)制度安排與審計(jì)質(zhì)量需求——中天勤客戶(hù)流向的案例分析[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2002年12期

10 劉明輝,李黎,張羽;我國(guó)審計(jì)市場(chǎng)集中度與審計(jì)質(zhì)量關(guān)系的實(shí)證分析[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2003年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：2339840