【摘要】： 在經(jīng)濟(jì)迅速發(fā)展的今天,資本市場(chǎng)的角逐已經(jīng)越來(lái)越凸現(xiàn)為利益的制衡,公司治理問(wèn)題日益突出。作為和諧社會(huì)的直接創(chuàng)造者之一,公司經(jīng)營(yíng)狀況的優(yōu)劣將直接關(guān)系到千家萬(wàn)戶的幸福和安寧。為了更好地保護(hù)廣大股東尤其是中小股東的權(quán)益,我國(guó)引入了審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度。從各國(guó)審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度實(shí)施的情況看,在立法機(jī)構(gòu)的推動(dòng)下,審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度已經(jīng)逐步成為上市公司完善治理結(jié)構(gòu)的一項(xiàng)重要制度。 本文從公司治理及審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度的相關(guān)理論入手,首先分析了公司治理理論的意義作用及架構(gòu),闡述公司治理實(shí)質(zhì)上是一種利益制衡關(guān)系。審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度從產(chǎn)生發(fā)展至今,與獨(dú)立董事制度、監(jiān)事制度、內(nèi)部審計(jì)制度的關(guān)系密不可分,而審計(jì)委員會(huì)在公司治理中的重要性更是通過(guò)《薩班斯法案》得到促進(jìn)和加強(qiáng)。其次本文對(duì)審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度在我國(guó)實(shí)施的情況進(jìn)行考察,分析了中國(guó)上市公司審計(jì)委員會(huì)的現(xiàn)狀及問(wèn)題�；仡櫫税踩皇录⑴连斃厥录l(fā)生的原因及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示,并結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)ITG公司案例,對(duì)審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度發(fā)揮作用的情況進(jìn)行闡述。通過(guò)分析美國(guó)、歐洲、日本等國(guó)外審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度,揭示各國(guó)審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示。最后對(duì)審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度提出優(yōu)化和改進(jìn)的思路,指出審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度還需加強(qiáng)獨(dú)立性,完善獨(dú)立董事制度,改善控制環(huán)境及監(jiān)督過(guò)程,還有待充分發(fā)揮其效能。 本文研究指出審計(jì)委員會(huì)在公司治理中承擔(dān)了一個(gè)十分重要的角色,是會(huì)計(jì)信息真實(shí)性的必要保證。審計(jì)委員會(huì)在我國(guó)還要妥善處理和監(jiān)事會(huì)及內(nèi)部審計(jì)的關(guān)系,我國(guó)上市公司對(duì)審計(jì)委員會(huì)的選擇并非主動(dòng),審計(jì)委員會(huì)的法律依托問(wèn)題及在非企業(yè)組織中運(yùn)用的可能性和必要性還有待進(jìn)一步探討。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy, the competition of capital market is becoming more and more important, and the problem of corporate governance is becoming more and more prominent. As one of the direct creators of a harmonious society, the quality of the company's management will directly affect the happiness and peace of thousands of households. In order to better protect the rights and interests of the majority of shareholders, especially the minority shareholders, our country has introduced the audit committee system. Judging from the implementation of the audit committee system in various countries, the audit committee system has gradually become an important system for the listed companies to improve their governance structure under the promotion of the legislature. Starting with the relevant theories of corporate governance and audit committee system, this paper first analyzes the significance and structure of corporate governance theory, and expounds that corporate governance is essentially a kind of interest balance relationship. The audit committee system has been closely related to the independent director system, the supervisor system and the internal audit system, and the importance of the audit committee in corporate governance has been promoted and strengthened through the Sarbanes Act. Secondly, this paper investigates the implementation of the audit committee system in China, and analyzes the current situation and problems of the audit committee of listed companies in China. This paper reviews the causes of the Enron incident, the Parmarat incident and the enlightenment to our country, and expounds the effect of audit committee system on the domestic ITG company case. By analyzing the audit committee system of America, Europe, Japan and other foreign countries, this paper reveals the enlightenment of the audit committee system to our country. Finally, the author puts forward the idea of optimizing and improving the audit committee system, and points out that the audit committee system still needs to strengthen its independence, perfect the independent director system, improve the control environment and supervision process, and still need to give full play to its efficiency. This paper points out that the audit committee plays a very important role in corporate governance and is the necessary guarantee of the authenticity of accounting information. The audit committee should also properly handle the relationship with the board of supervisors and internal audit in our country. The selection of the audit committee by listed companies in our country is not an initiative. The legal support of audit committee and the possibility and necessity of its application in non-enterprise organizations need to be further explored.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：F239.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李愛(ài)華;;美國(guó)獨(dú)立審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度的演進(jìn)與啟示[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2007年07期

2 陳漢文,夏文賢,黎代福;受托責(zé)任、信息披露與規(guī)則安排——公司治理、受托責(zé)任與審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度(上)[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2003年12期

3 陳漢文,夏文賢,陳秋金;上市公司審計(jì)委員會(huì):案例分析與模式改進(jìn)——公司治理、受托責(zé)任與審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度(下)[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2004年01期

4 陳平澤;對(duì)我國(guó)審計(jì)委員會(huì)制度的幾點(diǎn)建議[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2002年06期

5 黃彤;監(jiān)事會(huì)、審計(jì)委員會(huì)與內(nèi)部審計(jì):功能定位與職責(zé)劃分[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2004年04期

6 李斌;陳凌云;;我國(guó)上市公司審計(jì)委員會(huì)有效性研究——基于上市公司年報(bào)補(bǔ)丁的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)研究;2006年03期

7 李婉麗,馮均科,任啟哲;上市公司建立審計(jì)委員會(huì)應(yīng)處理好四大關(guān)系[J];財(cái)政研究;2002年11期

8 廖義剛;國(guó)外關(guān)于審計(jì)委員會(huì)的實(shí)證研究回顧[J];中國(guó)注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師;2004年07期

9 汪偉麗;設(shè)立審計(jì)委員會(huì) 提高內(nèi)審獨(dú)立性——基于制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的解釋[J];金融會(huì)計(jì);2004年09期

10 王樺 ,夏文賢 ,陳漢文;中國(guó)上市公司審計(jì)委員會(huì)的特征分布——基于2002年年報(bào)的描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)分析[J];中國(guó)審計(jì);2003年Z1期

，

本文編號(hào)：2219437