發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-08 14:36

  本文選題：現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì) + 審計(jì)環(huán)境　； 參考：《東北大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著人類步入21世紀(jì),世界經(jīng)濟(jì)急劇變化,企業(yè)與外界環(huán)境聯(lián)系加強(qiáng),由于企業(yè)盈利的沖動(dòng)和外部對(duì)企業(yè)日益高漲的期望,企業(yè)進(jìn)行財(cái)務(wù)舞弊的動(dòng)機(jī)和壓力日益增大,從而導(dǎo)致國(guó)內(nèi)外審計(jì)失敗案件越演越烈,注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師的審計(jì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)也隨之越來越大。正是在這樣嚴(yán)峻的現(xiàn)實(shí)挑戰(zhàn)而前,注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界都急需要一種新型的審計(jì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)模型和審計(jì)模式來更好地幫助注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師規(guī)避審計(jì)職業(yè)風(fēng)險(xiǎn),并指引注冊(cè)會(huì)計(jì)師提高審計(jì)的效率和效果,現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)就是在這樣的情況下孕育而生了。隨后現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)成為倍受業(yè)內(nèi)外人士關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)問題。國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)師聯(lián)合會(huì)下屬的國(guó)際審計(jì)和保證準(zhǔn)則理事會(huì)于2003年10月發(fā)布了三個(gè)以建立現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)為核心的新的國(guó)際審計(jì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)準(zhǔn)則,并要求從2004年12月15日或之后開始的期間財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表審計(jì),執(zhí)行新風(fēng)險(xiǎn)準(zhǔn)則及相應(yīng)修訂發(fā)布的其他準(zhǔn)則。我國(guó)財(cái)政部根據(jù)國(guó)際審計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的最新發(fā)展,也于2006年2月15日,財(cái)政部頒布了一系列新的審計(jì)準(zhǔn)則,并要求從2007年1月開始在國(guó)內(nèi)會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所中執(zhí)行�？梢�,現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)在世界范圍內(nèi)的實(shí)施已是不可逆轉(zhuǎn)的趨勢(shì)。因此,對(duì)現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)進(jìn)行理論和實(shí)務(wù)方面的系統(tǒng)研究就顯得尤為重要。 由此,筆者對(duì)現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)的產(chǎn)生、理論框架及其應(yīng)用情況進(jìn)行了較為系統(tǒng)、深入的分析,并針對(duì)我國(guó)的應(yīng)用現(xiàn)狀提出了在我國(guó)運(yùn)用現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)面臨的問題及對(duì)策,希望能夠探索出一條適合我國(guó)國(guó)情的現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)發(fā)展道路,以有助于我國(guó)審計(jì)理論的研究和實(shí)踐運(yùn)用,有助于我國(guó)審計(jì)技術(shù)水平的提高,有助于我國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所的國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。
[Abstract]:As human beings step into the 21st century, the world economy changes dramatically, and the relationship between enterprises and the outside environment is strengthened. As a result of the impulse of profit and the increasing expectation of external enterprises, the motivation and pressure of financial fraud are increasing day by day. As a result, the audit failure cases at home and abroad become more and more serious, and the audit risk of CPA becomes larger and greater. Just before such a severe challenge, CPA theorists and practitioners urgently need a new type of audit risk model and audit model to help CPA avoid audit professional risks. And guide CPA to improve the efficiency and effect of audit, modern risk-oriented audit is born under such circumstances. After that, modern risk-oriented audit has become a hot issue concerned by people inside and outside the industry. In October 2003, the International auditing and Assurance Standards Board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) issued three new international audit risk standards with the core of establishing a modern risk-oriented audit. The audit of the financial statements for the period commencing December 15, 2004, and the implementation of the new risk standards and other standards issued accordingly are required. According to the latest development of international auditing standards, the Ministry of Finance issued a series of new auditing standards on February 15, 2006, and requested that they be implemented in domestic accounting firms from January 2007. Therefore, the implementation of modern risk-oriented audit in the world is an irreversible trend. Therefore, it is particularly important to study the theory and practice of modern risk-oriented audit. Therefore, the author makes a systematic and in-depth analysis of the emergence, theoretical framework and application of modern risk-oriented audit. In view of the present situation of our country's application, the paper puts forward the problems and countermeasures of applying modern risk-oriented audit in our country, hoping to explore a way to develop modern risk-based audit, which is suitable for our country's national conditions. It is helpful to the research and application of audit theory in our country, to the improvement of auditing technology level and to the international competition of accounting firms in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：F239.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李華軍;張曉峰;劉景賢;張國(guó)杰;;現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)在我國(guó)的應(yīng)用問題探討[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2005年12期

2 王澤霞;鄧川;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)模式辨析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)論叢;2006年02期

3 陳麗京;李飛;;從審計(jì)模式的演進(jìn)看風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)及其在我國(guó)的應(yīng)用[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2006年06期

4 劉峰,許菲;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向型審計(jì)·法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)·審計(jì)質(zhì)量──兼論“五大”在我國(guó)審計(jì)市場(chǎng)的行為[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2002年02期

5 張龍平 ,李長(zhǎng)愛 ,鄧福賢;國(guó)際審計(jì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)準(zhǔn)則的最新發(fā)展及其啟示[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2004年12期

6 王澤霞;論風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)發(fā)展創(chuàng)新——管理舞弊導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2004年12期

7 謝榮,吳建友;現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)理論研究與實(shí)務(wù)發(fā)展[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2004年04期

8 李兆華;對(duì)現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年06期

9 朱小平,葉友;“審計(jì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”概念體系的比較與辨析[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年05期

10 任德新,張恒,楊鵬程;審計(jì)實(shí)務(wù)中"道德風(fēng)險(xiǎn)"的生成機(jī)制及規(guī)避策略[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 邱明艷;我國(guó)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)模式的選擇研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2007年

2 宋志永;基于重大錯(cuò)報(bào)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的審計(jì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)模型應(yīng)用研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2007年

3 宋晶晶;基于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估的現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2007年

4 楊東升;現(xiàn)代風(fēng)險(xiǎn)導(dǎo)向?qū)徲?jì)在實(shí)務(wù)中的運(yùn)用研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1996136