【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)科技水平的不斷提高，專利技術(shù)在國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)中發(fā)揮著越來(lái)越重要的作用。企業(yè)雖然可以自主研發(fā)技術(shù)，然而僅僅依靠企業(yè)自身內(nèi)部的技術(shù)研發(fā)力量，已經(jīng)越來(lái)越難以滿足企業(yè)發(fā)展對(duì)技術(shù)的需求，專利權(quán)的交易應(yīng)運(yùn)而生，且其涉及的領(lǐng)域和規(guī)模迅速擴(kuò)大。專利權(quán)的價(jià)值評(píng)估是專利技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓過程中的核心問題。合理評(píng)估專利權(quán)價(jià)值，能夠促進(jìn)專利交易順利進(jìn)行，從而使其充分地參與經(jīng)濟(jì)生活。 本文首先介紹了專利權(quán)價(jià)值評(píng)估的三大傳統(tǒng)方法，，并分析和比較了它們各自的優(yōu)劣之處。其次介紹了實(shí)物期權(quán)理論和實(shí)物期權(quán)定價(jià)模型，探討了用實(shí)物期權(quán)法評(píng)估專利權(quán)價(jià)值的適用性和優(yōu)勢(shì)。本文認(rèn)為Black-Scholes模型相比二叉樹模型而言，更適于專利權(quán)價(jià)值評(píng)估。再次，對(duì)Black-Scholes模型在專利價(jià)值評(píng)估中的應(yīng)用進(jìn)行了探討，重點(diǎn)對(duì)模型中的各參數(shù)進(jìn)行了分析。最后，本文進(jìn)行了案例分析，分別運(yùn)用傳統(tǒng)的收益現(xiàn)值法和Black-Scholes模型對(duì)X公司的專利權(quán)價(jià)值進(jìn)行評(píng)估。評(píng)估結(jié)果顯示后者所得的項(xiàng)目?jī)衄F(xiàn)值大于前者，這是因?yàn)閷?shí)物期權(quán)法考慮了專利權(quán)的靈活性投資價(jià)值。本文認(rèn)為傳統(tǒng)的收益法低估了專利權(quán)的價(jià)值，運(yùn)用實(shí)物期權(quán)法所得出的評(píng)估值是確定最佳專利資產(chǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移價(jià)格的重要參考。同時(shí)應(yīng)將實(shí)物期權(quán)思維方式應(yīng)用到專利產(chǎn)品項(xiàng)目的投資和生產(chǎn)決策中。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, patent technology plays a more and more important role in the construction of national economy. Although enterprises can independently research and develop technology, it is more and more difficult for enterprises to meet the demand for technology development only by relying on their own internal technological research and development forces. The patent trade has emerged as the times require. And its area and the scale of the rapid expansion. The value evaluation of patent right is the core problem in the process of patent technology transfer. Reasonable evaluation of patent value can promote the smooth progress of patent transaction and make it participate fully in economic life. In this paper, three traditional methods of patent value evaluation are introduced, and their advantages and disadvantages are analyzed and compared. Secondly, it introduces the real option theory and the real option pricing model, and discusses the applicability and advantage of the real option method to evaluate the patent value. This paper argues that Black-Scholes model is more suitable for patent value evaluation than binary tree model. Thirdly, the application of Black-Scholes model in patent value evaluation is discussed, and the parameters of the model are analyzed. Finally, this paper carries on the case analysis, respectively uses the traditional income present value method and the Black-Scholes model carries on the appraisal to the X company patent right value. The results show that the net present value of the latter is greater than that of the former, because the real options method takes into account the flexible investment value of the patent. This paper holds that the traditional income method underestimates the value of patent right, and the evaluation value obtained by using real option method is an important reference for determining the best transfer price of patent assets. At the same time, the thinking mode of real option should be applied to the investment and production decision of patent product project.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F224;F204

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王關(guān)義,汪洋;無(wú)形資產(chǎn)中專利權(quán)評(píng)估方法初探[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年08期

2 張濤;肖俠;戴華江;;基于模塊化的企業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)價(jià)值增值研究[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2010年18期

3 陳麗蓉;孫芳城;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)評(píng)估現(xiàn)狀、原因及對(duì)策分析[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2010年20期

4 郭潔;;實(shí)物期權(quán)理論在專利權(quán)價(jià)值評(píng)估中的應(yīng)用[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2007年12期

5 于磊;王淑珍;;論技術(shù)類知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)資產(chǎn)評(píng)估中實(shí)物期權(quán)法的適用性[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2010年06期

6 劉英,宣國(guó)良;現(xiàn)實(shí)期權(quán):企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略投資決策的新視點(diǎn)[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2000年02期

7 靳曉東;;專利權(quán)價(jià)值評(píng)估方法述評(píng)與比較[J];中國(guó)發(fā)明與專利;2010年09期

8 賀武,劉平;基于實(shí)物期權(quán)的專利權(quán)估值方法[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2005年07期

9 劉偉;;淺析無(wú)形資產(chǎn)評(píng)估[J];廣西輕工業(yè);2010年05期

10 齊貴祥;專利權(quán)價(jià)格的評(píng)估[J];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1999年S1期

本文編號(hào)：2205158