本文關(guān)鍵詞： 可轉(zhuǎn)債定價 信用利差 實(shí)證分析 定價效率　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：可轉(zhuǎn)換債券作為一種混合創(chuàng)新型金融工具,它已成為一種兼具債權(quán)和股權(quán)特性的重要投融資工具,但其含權(quán)的特性使得其定價較一般債券更加復(fù)雜,可轉(zhuǎn)債的合理定價對于發(fā)行公司正確制定可轉(zhuǎn)債的條款以降低融資成本,投資者優(yōu)化投資策略乃至整個債券市場的發(fā)展都有重要的意義。在這種現(xiàn)實(shí)的背景下,本文著眼于中國可轉(zhuǎn)債市場的現(xiàn)實(shí)發(fā)展環(huán)境,對不同信用利差下的可轉(zhuǎn)債進(jìn)行定價研究,以期探討適合我國可轉(zhuǎn)債定價的模型。本文首先闡述了可轉(zhuǎn)債的定義和概念,從股權(quán)性、債權(quán)性和期權(quán)性三個方面對可轉(zhuǎn)債的各個要素進(jìn)行介紹。接著系統(tǒng)地介紹了可轉(zhuǎn)債的傳統(tǒng)定價方法,包括Black-Scholes模型、二叉樹定價模型和蒙特卡羅模擬方法,在借鑒這些傳統(tǒng)定價模型的基礎(chǔ)上,探討了基于公司價值和無風(fēng)險利率的可轉(zhuǎn)債雙因素定價模型,并在分析上市公司信用風(fēng)險的基礎(chǔ)上,推導(dǎo)出了上市公司的信用利差。結(jié)合信用利差和KMV定價模型,推導(dǎo)出了動態(tài)信用利差下的可轉(zhuǎn)債定價模型。本文選取民生銀行可轉(zhuǎn)換債券(簡稱“民生轉(zhuǎn)債”)、國電電力可轉(zhuǎn)換債券(簡稱“國電轉(zhuǎn)債”)、寧波海運(yùn)可轉(zhuǎn)換債券(簡稱“海運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)債”)、中國石化可轉(zhuǎn)換債券(簡稱“石化轉(zhuǎn)債”)、泰爾重工可轉(zhuǎn)換債券(簡稱“泰爾轉(zhuǎn)債”)、工行商銀行可轉(zhuǎn)換債券(簡稱“工行轉(zhuǎn)債”)、中國銀行可轉(zhuǎn)換債券(簡稱“中行轉(zhuǎn)債”)、博匯紙業(yè)可轉(zhuǎn)換債券(簡稱“博匯轉(zhuǎn)債”)和中鼎股份可轉(zhuǎn)換債券(簡稱“中鼎轉(zhuǎn)債”)九只可轉(zhuǎn)債作為定價的樣本,用Matlab對這九只可轉(zhuǎn)債進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,并通過比較不同信用利差下的可轉(zhuǎn)債定價模型得出的理論價格與其實(shí)際價格,得出動態(tài)信用利差下可轉(zhuǎn)債定價模型較靜態(tài)信用利差下的定價模型和無信用風(fēng)險情況下的定價模型具有更高的定價效率。在一般情況下,靜態(tài)信用利差下的可轉(zhuǎn)債定價效率也高于無信用風(fēng)險情況下的可轉(zhuǎn)債定價效率。
[Abstract]:As a mixed and innovative financial instrument, convertible bond has become an important investment and financing tool with the characteristics of both creditor's rights and equity, but its rights characteristics make its pricing more complicated than that of ordinary bonds. Reasonable pricing of convertible bonds is of great significance for issuing companies to correctly formulate the terms of convertible bonds in order to reduce financing costs, and for investors to optimize investment strategies and even the development of the whole bond market. This paper focuses on the real development environment of China's convertible bond market, and studies the pricing of convertible bonds under different credit spreads in order to explore a model suitable for China's convertible bond pricing. Firstly, this paper expounds the definition and concept of convertible bonds. This paper introduces the elements of convertible bonds from three aspects: equity, creditor's rights and options. Then, it systematically introduces the traditional pricing methods of convertible bonds, including Black-Scholes model, binomial tree pricing model and Monte Carlo simulation method. Based on these traditional pricing models, this paper discusses the dual-factor pricing model of convertible bonds based on corporate value and risk-free interest rate, and analyzes the credit risk of listed companies. The credit spread of listed companies is derived, which combines credit spread with KMV pricing model. The pricing model of convertible bonds under dynamic credit spreads is derived in this paper. In this paper, the convertible bonds of Minsheng Bank (referred to as "people's livelihood conversion bonds"), the convertible bonds of National Power Power Company (referred to as "national power conversion bonds"), and Ningbo Marine convertible bonds (Ningbo Marine Convertible Bonds) are selected in this paper (. Abbreviated as "marine convertible bonds", Sinopec convertible bonds (abbreviated as "petrochemical convertible bonds", Taier heavy industry convertible bonds, ICBC commercial bank convertible bonds, bank of china convertible bonds, bank of china convertible bonds. Nine convertible bonds (referred to as "Bank of China" convertible bonds, Bohui paper convertible bonds ("Bohui convertible bonds") and Zhongding shares convertible bonds ("Zhongding convertible bonds") are used as samples for pricing. The empirical analysis of the nine convertible bonds is carried out with Matlab, and the theoretical price and the actual price of the convertible bonds under different credit spreads are compared. It is concluded that the pricing model of convertible bonds under dynamic credit spreads has higher pricing efficiency than that under static credit spreads and without credit risk. The pricing efficiency of convertible bonds under static credit spreads is also higher than that of convertible bonds without credit risk.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.51

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 張小龍;趙超兒;;最優(yōu)動態(tài)價格問題的有限單元法解[J];五邑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2008年04期

2 劉毅;陳瑤;;基于LSM模型的中國可轉(zhuǎn)債定價問題初探[J];現(xiàn)代財(cái)經(jīng)(天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年09期

3 劉善存;宋殿宇;金華;;分?jǐn)?shù)布朗運(yùn)動下帶違約風(fēng)險的可轉(zhuǎn)換債券定價[J];中國管理科學(xué);2011年06期

4 龔其國;陳涼;;我國上市公司可轉(zhuǎn)債定價及實(shí)證研究[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2014年05期

5 唐薇;馮長煥;;一元線性回歸模型的參數(shù)估計(jì)法的誤差分析[J];宜賓學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年12期

6 王天宇;;我國可轉(zhuǎn)債市場未來發(fā)展趨向探究——基于上海企業(yè)實(shí)證分析[J];西部金融;2015年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 黃強(qiáng);我國可轉(zhuǎn)換債券定價方法問題分析[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

2 彭曉;我國可轉(zhuǎn)換債券的定價理論及實(shí)證研究[D];東華大學(xué);2011年

3 趙嬋娟;基于正交最小二乘法的EIV模型及其醫(yī)學(xué)應(yīng)用[D];山西醫(yī)科大學(xué);2011年

4 史慶盛;中國可轉(zhuǎn)換債券的定價模型及算法研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2011年

5 吳憲海;帶有違約風(fēng)險的可轉(zhuǎn)債定價及實(shí)證分析[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

6 鄒洋;基于圖像處理的搖表讀數(shù)系統(tǒng)的研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

7 張健;自適應(yīng)子結(jié)構(gòu)擬動力試驗(yàn)方法[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

8 周欣;可轉(zhuǎn)換債券定價方法適用性的實(shí)證研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年

9 祝荷君;基于GARCH模型的美式期權(quán)LSM仿真定價的理論與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];華東交通大學(xué);2011年

10 武辰胤;考慮利率價差的可轉(zhuǎn)換債券定價模型及其實(shí)證研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1535771