本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國金融犯罪立法完善研究　出處：《安徽大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 金融犯罪 刑事立法 刑罰配置

【摘要】：金融是現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)的核心和杠桿。所謂金融犯罪是指發(fā)生在金融業(yè)務(wù)活動(dòng)領(lǐng)域中的,違反金融管理法律法規(guī)及有關(guān)規(guī)定,危害國家有關(guān)貨幣、銀行等金融管理制度,破壞金融管理秩序,情節(jié)嚴(yán)重,依照刑法應(yīng)當(dāng)受到刑法懲罰的行為。我國目前金融犯罪發(fā)案率高、涉及面廣、社會(huì)危害性大的惡性經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪活動(dòng),不僅給國家造成了巨大的經(jīng)濟(jì)損失,而且嚴(yán)重破壞了金融秩序,社會(huì)危害惡劣。 本文以我國現(xiàn)行的刑法第三章“破壞社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序罪”中第四、五節(jié)規(guī)定的“破壞金融管理秩序罪”和“金融詐騙罪”中各種犯罪為主要研究范圍。我國金融犯罪立法模式,在收集閱讀了解國內(nèi)外相關(guān)規(guī)定的基礎(chǔ)上,提出我國金融犯罪立法模式的個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)。目前,國內(nèi)對(duì)我國現(xiàn)行的金融犯罪立法模式的觀點(diǎn)有三種；一是認(rèn)為我國有關(guān)金融犯罪的立法模式是“刑法典”,而是認(rèn)為“刑法典與特別刑法規(guī)定相結(jié)合”的立法模式,三是“刑法典、特別刑法和附屬刑法相結(jié)合”的金融刑事立法模式。關(guān)于我國現(xiàn)行金融刑事法律的缺陷,我國現(xiàn)行的法律中,有關(guān)于金融犯罪的規(guī)定還是比較全面并具有一定的科學(xué)性的,在立法上采用了刑法典與附屬刑法規(guī)定相結(jié)合的模式,總體上能夠滿足打擊金融犯罪需要的司法實(shí)踐。但也存在新類型的金融犯罪,譬如期貨、證券、信托等新的金融犯罪,其犯罪手段方式并未為完全我國現(xiàn)行的金融刑事法律所規(guī)范,所以對(duì)其的打擊有效性不足。另一個(gè)方面就是,我國金融刑事法律法規(guī)缺乏協(xié)調(diào)性,缺乏部門法之間的協(xié)調(diào),有時(shí)可能是相互沖突的情況。關(guān)于完善我國金融犯罪立法的建議。從法理上來說,法律之間要相互協(xié)調(diào),以保證法律制度的完整性。刑法作為專門規(guī)定犯罪、刑事責(zé)任和刑罰的法律,應(yīng)該與其他部門法保持一致。避免部門法律或法規(guī)認(rèn)為是犯罪,刑法卻沒有相應(yīng)規(guī)定,以至于出現(xiàn)無法可依的被動(dòng)局面。在經(jīng)濟(jì)型犯罪里設(shè)置死刑不僅不符合國際廢除死刑的潮流,而且從犯罪預(yù)防目的上來看,死刑的威嚇作用收效甚微。 筆者研究對(duì)比了國外金融犯罪刑事法律的相關(guān)規(guī)定,立足我國現(xiàn)行的金融犯罪刑事立法規(guī)定,從金融犯罪立法內(nèi)容、立法模式及個(gè)罪刑罰規(guī)定的角度出發(fā)進(jìn)行研究分析。分析研究提出一些完善金融犯罪立法的一些建議。首先我們應(yīng)該從宏觀層面協(xié)調(diào)刑法與相關(guān)金融法律法規(guī)之間的不協(xié)調(diào)之處。法律之間要相互協(xié)調(diào),以保證法律制度的完整性。作為懲治經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪的金融刑罰,不在與懲治手段有多嚴(yán)厲,而在于嚴(yán)密刑事法網(wǎng),針對(duì)犯罪分子的心理,有針對(duì)性的制定懲罰手段,才能有效有力度地打擊金融犯罪,完善刑罰規(guī)定,以此才能有效預(yù)防金融犯罪。只有金融犯罪的立法不斷完善和發(fā)展,才能適應(yīng)金融活動(dòng)發(fā)展要求,更好為經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展服務(wù)。筆者立足于為我國預(yù)防和懲治金融犯罪相關(guān)立法及司法事件提供理論依據(jù),著眼于完善我國金融刑事法律體系及金融刑罰規(guī)定的不足,為今后的金融司法實(shí)踐和立法工作提供些許參考。
[Abstract]:Finance is the core of modern economy and the lever. The so-called financial crimes that occur in the financial business activities in violation of laws and regulations, financial management and other relevant provisions, harm of the currency, banks and other financial management system, the destruction of financial management order, if the circumstances are serious, in accordance with the provisions of the criminal law should be subject to criminal punishment behavior. China's current financial the crime rate is high, involving a wide range of social harm large malignant economic crime, not only to the country caused huge economic losses, but also seriously undermined the financial order, social harm is bad.
Based on China's present criminal law, the third chapter "the crime of undermining the socialist market economic order" section fourth, fifth "the destruction of financial management order crime" and "financial fraud" in various crimes as the main research scope. The mode of financial crime legislation in China, in the collection of reading based regulations at home and abroad, put forward the legislation the mode of financial crime in our personal point of view. At present, the domestic of China's current financial crime legislation mode there are three viewpoints; one is that the legislation modes of financial crimes in our country is the "criminal law", but that "the legislative model of Chinese criminal law and criminal law, especially the combination of" three "the criminal law, especially criminal law and subsidiarycriminal law" financial criminal legislation mode. Defects of China's current financial criminal law, China's existing laws, regulations on Financial Crimes Is a more comprehensive and has certain scientific nature, in the legislation the provisions of criminal law and subsidiarycriminal law mode, generally can meet the need of judicial practice on financial crime. But there are also new types of financial crimes, such as futures, securities, trust and other financial crimes, the crime means not completely to regulate our current financial criminal law, so the lack of effectiveness of the attack. On the other hand, the financial criminal laws and regulations of our country lack of coordination, lack of coordination between the Department of law, may sometimes conflict with each other. On the improvement of China's financial crime from the legislative proposals. A legal point of view, to coordinate between the laws, to ensure the integrity of the legal system of criminal law. As the special provisions of criminal law, criminal responsibility and penalty, consistent with other department law and should avoid. Department of laws or regulations as a crime, criminal law has no corresponding provisions that could be in passive situation. In the economic crime in the establishment of death penalty does not conform to the international trend towards abolition and from crime prevention purposes, the deterrent effect of the death penalty have little effect.
The author compared the relevant provisions of the foreign financial criminal law, based on China's current financial criminal legislation, from financial crime legislation, legislation and crime penalty provisions of the angle of research and analysis. Research and analysis and put forward some suggestions of financial crime legislation. Firstly, we should from the macro level coordination of criminal law and relevant financial laws and regulations of the inconsistency. To coordinate between the laws, to ensure the integrity of the legal system. As punishment of economic crime and punishment in the financial penalty, not means how tough, but in the strict criminal law, the criminal psychology, targeted to develop means of punishment, to effective efforts to fight against financial crime, improve the penalty provisions, in order to effectively prevent financial crime. Only the financial crime legislation consummation and development, In order to adapt to the development requirements of financial activities, better services for economic development. This paper provides the theory basis for our country to prevent and punish financial crime legislation and judicial events, focusing on the lack of perfect legal system of financial and financial provisions of criminal penalty in China, to provide some reference for future financial legislation and judicial practice.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.33;D922.28

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 冉妮莉;;完善我國金融刑事立法的思考[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年10期

2 林安民;博士生;;金融刑法體系的構(gòu)建與發(fā)展[J];發(fā)展研究;2007年12期

3 趙芳;;論我國金融刑事立法體系的完善[J];南方金融;2006年11期

4 李婧;;我國金融犯罪的立法及其完善[J];廣西金融研究;2007年05期

5 李笑;;以吳英案論非暴力犯罪適用死刑問題[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年02期

6 胡陸生;;金融犯罪立法規(guī)模與設(shè)置方式評(píng)析[J];法治論壇;2013年01期

7 林曉梅;;再論經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化下我國金融詐騙罪的立法完善[J];法治論壇;2013年01期

8 徐立;;我國金融刑事立法的演變及展望[J];刑法論叢;2010年04期

9 劉憲權(quán);;論我國金融犯罪的刑罰配置[J];政治與法律;2011年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1382479