山西
[Abstract]:In China, rural land carries the dual functions of agricultural production and social security. With the advancement of urbanization, the conversion of cultivated land and agricultural land into national construction land has become the only way to urban development and construction. The revenue from the transfer of state-owned land has become the main source of local finance. The demand for non-agricultural construction land continues to increase, resulting in a large number of land-expropriated farmers. At present, the social security resettlement of land-expropriated farmers has gradually transitioned from one-time currency resettlement to a social security mechanism that can maintain their long-term life. But so far, China has no clear laws and regulations on the social security of land-expropriated farmers. The perfection of the system is the foundation of the guarantee. It is urgent to construct the "land exchange guarantee" system, which is suitable for the situation of the land expropriated farmers in this province. Based on the analysis of the policy of "land exchange for security" issued by Shanxi Province in 2007, it is found that there are vague provisions on medical security payment, the main body of government subsidy responsibility is not clear, and the proportion of compensation is fuzzy. The problems such as the imperfect social security treatment of the old and new land expropriated farmers continue to analyze the defects in the system and find that the root cause of the lack of social security system in our country is the imperfection of the land expropriation system in our country. The definition of rural land property right system is vague, the dualism of urban and rural household registration system and the lack of law on the construction of land expropriated farmers' social security system in the current law of our country. Because of all these reasons, there are great differences in content, form and strength between the life security of land-expropriated peasants and the social security of urban residents. The inherent defects of "land for security" in Shanxi Province have now emerged. When comparing the experience of security and resettlement in Shanghai, Chongqing, Chengdu and Zhejiang, it is found that it not only affects its basic right to subsistence and development, but also increases the living standards of urban and rural residents. It is not conducive to the integrated development of urban and rural areas. In the path selection of "land exchange for security" in Shanxi Province, the integration of urban and rural areas should be taken as the basic goal. In terms of system construction, we should clearly raise the compensation standard and level of "land exchange guarantee" system in Shanxi Province, strengthen the attention paid to the system construction, broaden the security projects, and strengthen employment training. At the same time, the system of "land exchange for security" and other security systems can be effectively linked to expand the scope of participation of land-expropriated farmers; On the way of raising funds, while establishing the provincial transfer payment platform, we should perfect the supervision system of funds and reduce the possible risk of ensuring funds for land-expropriated farmers by means of law. From the point of view of sustainable livelihood, reasonable resettlement should be carried out from the true wishes of farmers, land compensation fees and resettlement subsidies should be raised, government subsidies should be increased, and land-expropriated farmers would be guaranteed after they lost their land. Still able to achieve long-term income sources and stable social security, and to ensure that living standards do not fall due to land expropriation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:F321.1;F323.89
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馬小勇;白永秀;;農(nóng)地制度改革:農(nóng)民自主選擇的“土地?fù)Q保障方案”[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期
2 成得禮;;對(duì)中國城中村發(fā)展問題的再思考——基于失地農(nóng)民可持續(xù)生計(jì)的角度[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2008年03期
3 梁平;陳凌梅;;重慶市被征地農(nóng)轉(zhuǎn)非人員“土地?fù)Q保障”模式研究——基于重慶高新區(qū)的調(diào)查研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年12期
4 楊嘉瑩;;“土地?fù)Q保障”:城市化進(jìn)程中失地農(nóng)民的保障措施——北京市豐臺(tái)區(qū)草橋村的調(diào)查與思考[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2011年07期
5 王瑞雪;;土地?fù)Q保障參保主體多元化的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)解釋[J];調(diào)研世界;2012年11期
6 楊文健;仇鳳仙;李瀟;;二元困境下的失地農(nóng)民土地?fù)Q保障問題分析——基于NJ市D拆遷社區(qū)的調(diào)查研究[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期
7 盧海元;實(shí)物換保障:農(nóng)村社會(huì)養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)制度的創(chuàng)新之路[J];湖湘論壇;2003年01期
8 楊素青;;失地農(nóng)民社會(huì)保障現(xiàn)狀與對(duì)策——以山西為例[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2009年08期
9 曾慶學(xué);;“土地?fù)Q保”與農(nóng)民養(yǎng)老保障[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2011年07期
10 沈蘭;高忠文;;“土地?fù)Q保障”的兩種養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)模式研究[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年05期
,本文編號(hào):2441082
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2441082.html