【摘要】：唐山市城鎮(zhèn)化、工業(yè)化的快速發(fā)展造成城市建設(shè)用地需求的劇增。但是,這與耕地紅線的堅(jiān)守和農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地粗放利用的現(xiàn)狀形成了突出的矛盾。農(nóng)村宅基地承載著土地經(jīng)濟(jì)功能和一定的社會(huì)保障功能,是農(nóng)村建設(shè)用地的重要組成部分,農(nóng)村宅基地的有序退出可以大幅度緩解唐山市的人地矛盾,為唐山市的經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)提供重要物質(zhì)支撐。因此,唐山市急需建立切實(shí)可行的農(nóng)村宅基地退出機(jī)制。通過問卷調(diào)查和實(shí)地訪談的方式,獲取了唐山市農(nóng)村宅基地退出工作的實(shí)施情況和農(nóng)戶對(duì)于宅基地退出的意愿信息。通過對(duì)調(diào)研結(jié)果的分析得出,目前唐山市農(nóng)村宅基地退出過程中主要存在四個(gè)問題:第一,唐山市現(xiàn)行的農(nóng)村宅基地的退出政策對(duì)農(nóng)戶宅基地退出意愿的激勵(lì)作用較弱。第二,農(nóng)村宅基地退出的土地用途不規(guī)范,違法、違規(guī)使用農(nóng)村宅基地的現(xiàn)象時(shí)有發(fā)生,這嚴(yán)重?cái)_亂了農(nóng)村宅基地的退出工作。第三,在城鄉(xiāng)“二元體制”下,農(nóng)村人口的社會(huì)福利待遇與城市居民相差懸殊,農(nóng)戶對(duì)宅基地退出后的生活保障存在顧慮,往往不愿意配合宅基地退出工作。第四,農(nóng)村宅基地的無序利用影響了村容村貌建設(shè),農(nóng)村宅基地退出的效果不理想。進(jìn)一步,本研究通過文獻(xiàn)分析法,分析總結(jié)現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn);運(yùn)用定量分析法借鑒國內(nèi)外農(nóng)地流轉(zhuǎn)的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)。以西方產(chǎn)權(quán)理論和外部性理論為理論依據(jù),結(jié)合唐山市農(nóng)村宅基地退出過程中存在的問題,提出適合唐山市實(shí)際情況的農(nóng)村宅基地退出機(jī)制建議。建議唐山市建立“四輪驅(qū)動(dòng)”的農(nóng)村宅基地退出機(jī)制,把農(nóng)村宅基地退出的約束機(jī)制、激勵(lì)機(jī)制、保障機(jī)制和配套機(jī)制相結(jié)合,以促進(jìn)農(nóng)村土地資源的整合,為統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè)用地資源服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of urbanization and industrialization in Tangshan City caused a sharp increase in the demand for urban construction land. However, this has formed an outstanding contradiction with the adherence to the red line of cultivated land and the present situation of extensive utilization of rural construction land. As an important part of the rural construction land, the rural homestead is carrying the land economic function and certain social security function. The orderly withdrawal of the rural homestead can greatly alleviate the contradiction between people and land in Tangshan City. Tangshan to provide important material support for economic construction. Therefore, Tangshan urgent need to establish a practical rural homestead withdrawal mechanism. By means of questionnaire survey and field interview, the author obtained the implementation of rural homestead withdrawal in Tangshan City and the information of farmers' willingness to withdraw from homestead. Through the analysis of the results of the investigation, it is concluded that there are four main problems in the process of rural homestead withdrawal in Tangshan. Firstly, the exiting policy of the rural homestead in Tangshan City has a weak incentive effect on the farmers' willingness to withdraw from the homestead. Second, the rural homestead withdrawal land use is not standardized, illegal, illegal use of rural homestead phenomenon occurs from time to time, which seriously disturbed the rural homestead withdrawal work. Thirdly, under the dualistic system of urban and rural areas, the social welfare treatment of rural population is far from that of urban residents, and farmers are worried about the life security after the homestead withdrawal, and often unwilling to cooperate with the homestead withdrawal work. Fourth, the disorderly use of rural homestead affects the construction of village appearance, and the effect of rural homestead withdrawal is not ideal. Further, this study through the literature analysis, analysis and summary of the existing literature, the use of quantitative analysis method to learn from the advanced experience of agricultural land transfer at home and abroad. Based on the western theory of property rights and the theory of externality, combined with the problems existing in the process of rural homestead withdrawal in Tangshan City, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the withdrawal mechanism of rural homestead suitable for the actual situation in Tangshan City. It is suggested that Tangshan should establish a "four-wheel drive" mechanism for the withdrawal of rural homestead, and combine the restraint mechanism, incentive mechanism, security mechanism and supporting mechanism of rural homestead withdrawal, in order to promote the integration of rural land resources. For the overall planning of urban and rural construction land resources services.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華北理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F321.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 岳永兵;;宅基地退出:內(nèi)涵、模式與機(jī)制建立[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2016年11期

2 蘇彬彬;;昆明城中村改造中土地增值收益分配的若干問題研究[J];江西建材;2016年17期

3 楊永磊;;基于外部性理論的農(nóng)地轉(zhuǎn)用增值收益分配制度[J];江蘇農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2016年03期

4 于偉;劉本城;宋金平;;城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程中農(nóng)戶宅基地退出的決策行為及影響因素[J];地理研究;2016年03期

5 羅立順;宋天華;;新形勢下勞動(dòng)者創(chuàng)業(yè)優(yōu)勢及路徑探析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年03期

6 周光發(fā);章合運(yùn);;農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的困境、態(tài)勢與突破[J];國土資源科技管理;2015年06期

7 關(guān)江華;黃朝禧;;基于雙邊理論的農(nóng)村宅基地流轉(zhuǎn)市場模式研究[J];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年06期

8 楊玉珍;;農(nóng)戶閑置宅基地退出的影響因素及政策銜接——行為經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)視角[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2015年07期

9 孔東菊;;戶籍改革背景下農(nóng)村宅基地退出機(jī)制研究[J];華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年04期

10 朱新華;;戶籍制度對(duì)農(nóng)戶宅基地退出意愿的影響[J];中國人口.資源與環(huán)境;2014年10期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 費(fèi)明明;城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程中農(nóng)村宅基地綜合利用與規(guī)劃研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）;2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙海鋒;基于農(nóng)戶意愿視角的宅基地退出機(jī)制研究[D];浙江財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院;2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2414363