【摘要】：東方市作為全國(guó)土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)確權(quán)、登記的試點(diǎn)地區(qū)之一,其外業(yè)測(cè)量與內(nèi)業(yè)登記任務(wù)已經(jīng)接近預(yù)期目標(biāo)。一方面來說,不動(dòng)產(chǎn)統(tǒng)一登記在全國(guó)展開,東方市作為一個(gè)典型的先驅(qū)實(shí)證案例值得被重視和研究;另一方面來說,土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)確權(quán)、登記工作的開展和完善關(guān)系著土地的合理流轉(zhuǎn),對(duì)保護(hù)農(nóng)民合法權(quán)益有著重要意義,也是穩(wěn)定土地產(chǎn)權(quán)的必然結(jié)果。在農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)確權(quán)、登記工作的進(jìn)行中,東方市既有自已成功的經(jīng)驗(yàn),也有很多的不足,而不管是經(jīng)驗(yàn)還是不足,其對(duì)于土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)確權(quán)、登記工作的進(jìn)一步部署均有積極意義�；谝陨系恼J(rèn)識(shí),本文主要以在東方市的具體調(diào)查研究為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合大量的新聞資料,文獻(xiàn)數(shù)據(jù),總結(jié)了東方市土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)確權(quán)、登記工作的進(jìn)展以及個(gè)中不足,并且列舉了一些典型的問題,最后著眼于東方土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)登記的經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)于全國(guó)的借鑒作用上來。本文結(jié)構(gòu)如下:第一部分,調(diào)研報(bào)告論述了東方市土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)確權(quán)登記調(diào)研總體情況,介紹了調(diào)研的背景和目的,也介紹了調(diào)研對(duì)象和調(diào)研的意義。提出東方市土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)確權(quán)、登記工作為不動(dòng)產(chǎn)統(tǒng)一登記制度建立后農(nóng)村土地登記提供了可行性、可復(fù)制性的經(jīng)驗(yàn)措施,對(duì)其他地方的土地確權(quán)、登記與流轉(zhuǎn)也具有借鑒作用。第二部分將結(jié)合調(diào)查問卷的問題和座談內(nèi)容詳細(xì)介紹了東方市土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的保障措施、登記現(xiàn)狀和確權(quán)原則,還介紹了東方市較為典型的土地糾紛和糾紛解決的辦法,該部分主要是實(shí)證分析,以及對(duì)調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)資料進(jìn)行展開論述。在典型糾紛部分,主要介紹了場(chǎng)社問題和開荒地問題;在糾紛的解決中,主要從行政途徑、訴訟途徑和仲裁途徑進(jìn)行闡明。最后還簡(jiǎn)單提到了農(nóng)戶對(duì)東方市土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)確權(quán)、登記工作的意見和建議。第三部分分析東方市土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)確權(quán)、登記中的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和不足。在經(jīng)驗(yàn)部分強(qiáng)調(diào)了基層組織的作用、主觀能動(dòng)性的發(fā)揮以及資金和制度保障的重要性;在不足部分則將第二部分的調(diào)研結(jié)果進(jìn)行細(xì)化總結(jié)。對(duì)應(yīng)第三部分,主要提到了場(chǎng)社關(guān)系復(fù)雜、開荒地確權(quán)困難、確權(quán)機(jī)關(guān)混亂、忽視確權(quán)公平以及仲裁制度閑置等較為棘手的問題。第四部分將東方市的問題和經(jīng)驗(yàn)上升到對(duì)全國(guó)的同類土地確權(quán)、登記的借鑒作用與意義的高度,與第三部分對(duì)應(yīng)提出了今后工作的改進(jìn)的方向,例如在基層強(qiáng)化農(nóng)戶權(quán)屬意識(shí),在確權(quán)的過程中兼顧公平和效率以及在制度上完善調(diào)解制度和仲裁機(jī)制等等。最后又講土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)確權(quán)、登記與不動(dòng)產(chǎn)統(tǒng)一登記相接軌,梳理出一些經(jīng)驗(yàn)也提出了一些改進(jìn)的建議。
[Abstract]:Dongfang City, as one of the pilot areas of land contract management right and registration in China, is close to the expected target. On the one hand, the unified registration of real estate is carried out throughout the country. Dongfang City, as a typical pilot case, deserves attention and research. On the other hand, the right to contract management of land is confirmed. The development and perfection of registration work is related to the rational circulation of land, which is of great significance to the protection of farmers' legitimate rights and interests, and is also the inevitable result of stabilizing land property rights. In the process of rural land contract management right confirmation and registration, Dongfang City has both its own successful experience and many shortcomings, and whether it is experienced or not, it has the right to confirm the right to land contract management right. The further deployment of registration is of positive significance. Based on the above understanding, this paper mainly based on the specific investigation and research in Dongfang City, combined with a large number of news materials and literature data, summed up the right to confirm the right to contract management of land in Dongfang City, the progress of the registration work and its shortcomings. And enumerates some typical questions, finally focuses on the oriental land contract management right registration experience for the national reference. The structure of this paper is as follows: in the first part, the research report discusses the general situation of the registration and investigation of the confirmed right of land contract management in Dongfang city, introduces the background and purpose of the investigation, and also introduces the object of investigation and the significance of the investigation. It is put forward that the right to contract management of land in Dongfang City is confirmed, and the registration provides a feasible and replicable empirical measure for the registration of rural land after the establishment of the unified registration system of immovable property, and confirms the right to land in other places. Registration and circulation also have a reference role. The second part will introduce in detail the safeguard measures, the registration status and the principle of confirming the right of land contract management in Dongfang city, and also introduce the typical land disputes and the methods of resolving disputes in Dongfang city according to the questions and discussion contents of the questionnaire. This part is mainly empirical analysis, as well as the data of the survey are discussed. In the part of typical disputes, the paper mainly introduces the problems of field and community and the problem of opening up wasteland; in the settlement of disputes, it mainly expounds from the administrative way, litigation way and arbitration way. In the end, the author briefly mentions the opinions and suggestions of farmers on the right of land contract management and registration in Dongfang City. The third part analyzes the right of land contract management in Dongfang city, the experience and deficiency in registration. In the part of experience, the role of grass-roots organizations, the role of subjective initiative and the importance of financial and institutional support are emphasized. In the insufficient part, the results of the second part are detailed and summarized. Corresponding to the third part, it mainly mentions the complicated relations between the field and the society, the difficulty of establishing the right of the wasteland, the confusion of the authority, the neglect of the fairness of the right of confirmation and the idle of the arbitration system, and so on. In the fourth part, the problems and experiences of Dongfang City are raised to the height of the reference function and significance of the same kind of land right and registration in the whole country, and corresponding to the third part, the improvement direction of the future work is put forward, such as strengthening the peasant household ownership consciousness at the grass-roots level. Fairness and efficiency should be taken into account in the process of confirming the right, and mediation system and arbitration mechanism should be improved. Finally, the right of land contract management is confirmed, the registration is in line with the unified registration of real estate, and some suggestions for improvement are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F321.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 田甜;李博;左停;;農(nóng)地確權(quán)中政府目標(biāo)與鄉(xiāng)土慣習(xí)的沖突與調(diào)適——以江西A村為例[J];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2017年01期

2 宋才發(fā);;農(nóng)村集體土地確權(quán)登記頒證的法治問題探討[J];中南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2017年01期

3 楊慶育;高軍;;我國(guó)農(nóng)地確權(quán)制度改革研究——從正當(dāng)性維度的考察[J];政法論叢;2015年06期

4 王進(jìn)文;;土地確權(quán)與國(guó)家德性——基于《憲法》第10條的法理分析[J];中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年04期

5 徐江;;土地確權(quán)實(shí)踐中存在的問題及優(yōu)化路徑[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2015年06期

6 朱北仲;;我國(guó)農(nóng)村土地確權(quán)中的問題與解決對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2015年05期

7 宋才發(fā);馬國(guó)輝;;農(nóng)村宅基地和集體建設(shè)用地使用權(quán)確權(quán)登記的法律問題探討[J];河北法學(xué);2015年03期

8 孫憲忠;;不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記基本范疇解析[J];法學(xué)家;2014年06期

9 王小映;;推進(jìn)農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)登記具有多重意義[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)營(yíng)管理;2014年11期

10 賀雪峰;;農(nóng)村土地確權(quán)應(yīng)當(dāng)慎行[J];決策;2014年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 喀斯木江·麥麥提依明;土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)登記制度研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2014年

2 童澤宇;我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

3 楊娜;農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

4 宋智萃;試論我國(guó)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記制度的完善[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2210324