蘇州新型農(nóng)民合作社對農(nóng)民收入影響的分析
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-15 18:49
【摘要】：改革開放以來，隨著我國農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)市場化進(jìn)程的不斷加快和農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)力的不斷提高，我國農(nóng)產(chǎn)品市場格局由賣方市場逐漸轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)榱速I方市場。特別是2001年我國加入WTO以后，農(nóng)產(chǎn)品競爭日趨激烈化和全球化，小農(nóng)戶分散經(jīng)營方式越來越難以適應(yīng)國內(nèi)外市場的變化，，農(nóng)產(chǎn)品賣難和農(nóng)民增收緩慢是長期困擾我國農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題。 80年代中期以來，為了應(yīng)對農(nóng)業(yè)現(xiàn)代化、市場化、國際化的需要，解決小農(nóng)戶對大市場的矛盾，分散經(jīng)營的小農(nóng)戶自愿聯(lián)合起來，組建起各種類型的農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社，如農(nóng)產(chǎn)品專業(yè)合作社、農(nóng)民股份合作社、專業(yè)協(xié)會等。這種被統(tǒng)稱為“農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社”的制度形式如雨后春筍般出現(xiàn)在我國廣大的農(nóng)村地區(qū)，并快速發(fā)展起來。 進(jìn)入2000年以后，合作社制度發(fā)生了一些新的變化，趨向股份化、多要素合作等，合作形式開始變得多種多樣，我們將這些新生的合作社統(tǒng)稱為新型的農(nóng)民合作社。 本文運(yùn)用交易費(fèi)用理論、產(chǎn)權(quán)理論、企業(yè)治理理論，收入分配理論等為工具，以江蘇省蘇州市為例證，通過理論分析和實(shí)證研究，揭示了新型農(nóng)民合作社影響農(nóng)民收入的內(nèi)部機(jī)制，分析了我國農(nóng)民合作社利益機(jī)制的現(xiàn)狀、問題、發(fā)展。指出了傳統(tǒng)合作社制度的一些不足之處，提出了我國農(nóng)民合作社制度改革和創(chuàng)新的發(fā)展方向，并給出了具體的方案和對策建議。 實(shí)證分析方面，運(yùn)用雙重差分模型（DID模型）對農(nóng)民的收入影響因素進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究，以考察新型合作社的對于農(nóng)民收入的促進(jìn)效應(yīng)。以往的合作社論文中，往往是對合作社制度的理論分析和案例分析，以定性分析為主，在少量的合作社定量分析中，有加入和未加入合作社的農(nóng)民收入增長的對比分析，本文進(jìn)一步將入股社員和未入股社員的收入增長進(jìn)行對比，來比較緊密型社員和松散型社員在利用合作社對自身收入的促進(jìn)效果上有何不同；并且考察了合作社內(nèi)部治理機(jī)制對合作社運(yùn)營效率和農(nóng)民收入的影響。 然后本文列舉了三個(gè)典型的合作社案例，比較了不同模式和不同治理機(jī)制的合作社發(fā)展?fàn)顩r，進(jìn)一步驗(yàn)證了理論分析和實(shí)證分析的結(jié)論。 最后，本文得出了結(jié)論：加入合作社對農(nóng)民的收益有正向的促進(jìn)作用；入股社員比松散型社員收入增長更快；規(guī)范合理的合作社產(chǎn)權(quán)制度和治理機(jī)制有利于提高合作社的效益和農(nóng)民收入，合作社應(yīng)該建立使農(nóng)民聯(lián)系更加緊密的公平合理的股金制度，同時(shí)堅(jiān)持社員的民主管理制度；合作社的股份化和市場化是不可逆轉(zhuǎn)的趨勢；將來，我國可以借鑒美國的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，在建立公開的、規(guī)范的交易市場前提下，在一定范圍內(nèi)，將農(nóng)民的股份市場化，這樣才能將市場信號導(dǎo)入合作社內(nèi)部，有利于建立更加有效率的合作社制度，使合作社更加適應(yīng)市場的變化。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, with the acceleration of the market-oriented process of agricultural production and the continuous improvement of agricultural productivity, the market pattern of agricultural products in China has gradually changed from the seller's market to the buyer's market. Especially after China's entry into WTO in 2001, the competition of agricultural products is becoming more and more fierce and globalization, so it is more and more difficult for small farmers to adapt to the changes of domestic and foreign markets. The difficulty in selling agricultural products and the slow increase in farmers' income have been the real problems that have plagued the agricultural development of our country for a long time. Since the mid-1980s, in order to cope with the needs of agricultural modernization, marketization and internationalization, we have solved the contradiction between small farmers and the large market. Decentralized small farmers voluntarily unite to form various types of farmers' professional cooperatives, such as specialized agricultural cooperatives, farmers' share cooperatives, professional associations and so on. This system, which is called "Farmers' specialized Cooperative", sprang up in the vast rural areas of China and developed rapidly. Since the beginning of 2000, some new changes have taken place in the cooperative system, such as demutualization, multi-factor cooperation and so on. This paper uses transaction cost theory, property right theory, corporate governance theory, income distribution theory as the tool, taking Suzhou City of Jiangsu Province as an example, through theoretical analysis and empirical research. This paper reveals the internal mechanism of the new type of farmers' co-operatives influencing the peasants' income, and analyzes the present situation, problems and development of the benefit mechanism of the farmers' cooperatives in our country. This paper points out some shortcomings of the traditional cooperative system, puts forward the developing direction of the reform and innovation of the peasant cooperative system in our country, and gives some concrete plans and countermeasures. In the aspect of empirical analysis, double difference model (DID model) is used to study the influencing factors of farmers' income in order to investigate the promoting effect of new type cooperatives on farmers' income. In the previous cooperative papers, the theoretical analysis and the case study of cooperative system are often focused on qualitative analysis. In a small number of cooperative quantitative analysis, there is a comparative analysis of the income growth of farmers who have joined or not joined the cooperative. This article further compares the income growth of the members with or without shares in order to compare the effect of promoting their income by the use of the cooperative between the compact members and the loose members. The influence of cooperative internal governance mechanism on cooperative operation efficiency and farmers' income is also investigated. Then this paper enumerates three typical cooperative cases, compares the development of cooperatives with different modes and different governance mechanisms, and further verifies the conclusions of theoretical analysis and empirical analysis. Finally, the paper draws a conclusion that joining the cooperative has a positive effect on the farmers' income, the income of the member who shares the shares increases faster than that of the loose member, and the income of the member of the loose type increases more quickly than that of the loose member. Standardizing reasonable cooperative property right system and governance mechanism is helpful to improve the benefit and income of the cooperative. The cooperative should establish a fair and reasonable share payment system which can make farmers more closely connected, and insist on the democratic management system of the members. The demutualization and marketization of cooperatives is an irreversible trend. In the future, China can learn from the experience of the United States and, on the premise of establishing an open and standardized trading market, marketize farmers' shares to a certain extent. Only in this way can the market signal be introduced into the cooperatives, which is conducive to the establishment of a more efficient cooperative system and the adaptation of the cooperatives to the changes in the market.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F321.42;F323.8
本文編號：2185090
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, with the acceleration of the market-oriented process of agricultural production and the continuous improvement of agricultural productivity, the market pattern of agricultural products in China has gradually changed from the seller's market to the buyer's market. Especially after China's entry into WTO in 2001, the competition of agricultural products is becoming more and more fierce and globalization, so it is more and more difficult for small farmers to adapt to the changes of domestic and foreign markets. The difficulty in selling agricultural products and the slow increase in farmers' income have been the real problems that have plagued the agricultural development of our country for a long time. Since the mid-1980s, in order to cope with the needs of agricultural modernization, marketization and internationalization, we have solved the contradiction between small farmers and the large market. Decentralized small farmers voluntarily unite to form various types of farmers' professional cooperatives, such as specialized agricultural cooperatives, farmers' share cooperatives, professional associations and so on. This system, which is called "Farmers' specialized Cooperative", sprang up in the vast rural areas of China and developed rapidly. Since the beginning of 2000, some new changes have taken place in the cooperative system, such as demutualization, multi-factor cooperation and so on. This paper uses transaction cost theory, property right theory, corporate governance theory, income distribution theory as the tool, taking Suzhou City of Jiangsu Province as an example, through theoretical analysis and empirical research. This paper reveals the internal mechanism of the new type of farmers' co-operatives influencing the peasants' income, and analyzes the present situation, problems and development of the benefit mechanism of the farmers' cooperatives in our country. This paper points out some shortcomings of the traditional cooperative system, puts forward the developing direction of the reform and innovation of the peasant cooperative system in our country, and gives some concrete plans and countermeasures. In the aspect of empirical analysis, double difference model (DID model) is used to study the influencing factors of farmers' income in order to investigate the promoting effect of new type cooperatives on farmers' income. In the previous cooperative papers, the theoretical analysis and the case study of cooperative system are often focused on qualitative analysis. In a small number of cooperative quantitative analysis, there is a comparative analysis of the income growth of farmers who have joined or not joined the cooperative. This article further compares the income growth of the members with or without shares in order to compare the effect of promoting their income by the use of the cooperative between the compact members and the loose members. The influence of cooperative internal governance mechanism on cooperative operation efficiency and farmers' income is also investigated. Then this paper enumerates three typical cooperative cases, compares the development of cooperatives with different modes and different governance mechanisms, and further verifies the conclusions of theoretical analysis and empirical analysis. Finally, the paper draws a conclusion that joining the cooperative has a positive effect on the farmers' income, the income of the member who shares the shares increases faster than that of the loose member, and the income of the member of the loose type increases more quickly than that of the loose member. Standardizing reasonable cooperative property right system and governance mechanism is helpful to improve the benefit and income of the cooperative. The cooperative should establish a fair and reasonable share payment system which can make farmers more closely connected, and insist on the democratic management system of the members. The demutualization and marketization of cooperatives is an irreversible trend. In the future, China can learn from the experience of the United States and, on the premise of establishing an open and standardized trading market, marketize farmers' shares to a certain extent. Only in this way can the market signal be introduced into the cooperatives, which is conducive to the establishment of a more efficient cooperative system and the adaptation of the cooperatives to the changes in the market.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F321.42;F323.8
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張笑寒;;農(nóng)村土地股份合作制的若干問題思考[J];調(diào)研世界;2009年05期
2 杜吟棠,潘勁;我國新型農(nóng)民合作社的雛形——京郊專業(yè)合作組織案例調(diào)查及理論探討[J];管理世界;2000年01期
3 黃勝忠;;轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社的成長機(jī)制研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2008年01期
4 郭紅東;當(dāng)前我國政府扶持農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織發(fā)展的行為選擇[J];農(nóng)村合作經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)營管理;2002年05期
5 浙江省農(nóng)業(yè)廳課題組;;農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社績效評價(jià)體系初探[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)營管理;2008年10期
6 傅晨;;我國農(nóng)村社區(qū)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的產(chǎn)權(quán)制度安排[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)營管理;2008年11期
7 應(yīng)瑞瑤;論農(nóng)業(yè)合作社的演進(jìn)趨勢與現(xiàn)代合作社的制度內(nèi)核[J];南京社會科學(xué);2004年01期
8 張紅宇;;對新時(shí)期農(nóng)民組織化幾個(gè)問題的思考[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2007年03期
9 林堅(jiān);黃勝忠;;成員異質(zhì)性與農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社的所有權(quán)分析[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2007年10期
10 馬彥麗;孟彩英;;我國農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社的雙重委托—代理關(guān)系——兼論存在的問題及改進(jìn)思路[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2008年05期
本文編號：2185090
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2185090.html
最近更新
教材專著
