中央“不得調(diào)地”政策:農(nóng)民的態(tài)度與村莊的土地調(diào)整決策——基于對黑龍江、安徽、山東、四川、陜西5省農(nóng)戶的調(diào)查
[Abstract]:Based on the survey data of rural households in Heilongjiang, Anhui, Shandong, Sichuan and Shaanxi provinces in 2016, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the farmers' attitude to the policy of "not to adjust land", the decision of land adjustment in villages and their influencing factors. The results show that the proportion of farmers who oppose the policy of "no adjustment of land" in the contract period is 16.4, and that of farmers who oppose the policy of "not to adjust land" for a long time is 39.3%, which means that the willingness of farmers to adjust their land after the expiration of the second round of contracts is extremely strong during the period from 2011 to 2016. About 16% of the farmers had experienced land adjustment, and the average number of land adjustment was 1.36, which was obviously lower than the level before 2010 mentioned in relevant literatures. The more the family population is negatively affected by the policy, the lower the support level of the policy is, which indicates that the change of family population is the main factor that affects the attitude of farmers to the policy of "no land transfer"; The farmers' attitude to the policy of "no land adjustment" during the contract period has a significant impact on the decision-making of land adjustment in villages. The more farmers are against it, the higher the probability and frequency of land adjustment in villages are. The lower the probability and frequency of the land adjustment in the village, the more the voice of the land adjustment within the village is an important factor in the decision-making of the land adjustment in the village. Considering that a significant proportion of the rural population is affected by the "no-land transfer" policy, it is foreseeable that there will be considerable pressure for land adjustment after the expiry of the second tranche of contracts, within the framework of collective ownership of rural land, It is difficult to achieve long-term policy goals.
【作者單位】: 中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學經(jīng)濟管理學院;
【基金】:農(nóng)業(yè)部課題“農(nóng)村人口變動對穩(wěn)定土地承包關(guān)系的影響研究”(編號:04162130112243015)的部分研究成果
【分類號】:F321.1
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 朱冬亮;土地調(diào)整:農(nóng)村社會保障與農(nóng)村社會控制[J];中國農(nóng)村觀察;2002年03期
2 商春榮;葉蘭;;新增無地人口土地調(diào)整意愿及對土地調(diào)整的影響[J];華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2013年03期
3 邱龍水;土地調(diào)整工作要從實從儉[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟;1990年10期
4 方倫平;關(guān)于土地調(diào)整的若干意見[J];調(diào)研世界;1994年01期
5 王朝;土地調(diào)整不宜過頻[J];河南農(nóng)業(yè);1996年11期
6 方爭游;介紹一種土地調(diào)整方法[J];農(nóng)村財務(wù)會計;1999年08期
7 陳華;土地調(diào)整不能阻礙村莊規(guī)劃實施[J];小城鎮(zhèn)建設(shè);1999年11期
8 賀鐵英;人口增長與土地調(diào)整的關(guān)系:一個理論推導[J];中國農(nóng)村觀察;2004年04期
9 張三峰;楊德才;;農(nóng)民的土地調(diào)整意愿及其影響因素分析——基于2006年中國綜合社會調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)[J];中國農(nóng)村觀察;2010年01期
10 李桂山;黃付俊;;當前農(nóng)村土地調(diào)整問題調(diào)查[J];人大建設(shè);2010年10期
相關(guān)會議論文 前1條
1 陶然;汪暉;黃璐;;二輪承包后的中國農(nóng)村土地行政性調(diào)整——典型事實、農(nóng)民反應(yīng)與政策含義[A];中國制度變遷的案例研究(土地卷)第八集[C];2011年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條
1 蔣正翔;農(nóng)民真正需要的是土地調(diào)整權(quán)[N];中國礦業(yè)報;2013年
2 郭俊霞 華中科技大學中國鄉(xiāng)村治理研究中心;土地調(diào)整的村莊地方性共識[N];中國社會科學報;2010年
3 記者 鐘邦國 通訊員 李廣用;土地調(diào)整鼓了農(nóng)民腰包[N];湛江日報;2011年
4 記者 馬寧;市林業(yè)局為社區(qū)建設(shè)預留足夠空間[N];德州日報;2010年
5 本報通訊員 榮朋;農(nóng)民自己的事農(nóng)民說了算[N];博爾塔拉報;2009年
6 本報記者 靳占修邋實習記者 付首鵬;河南新農(nóng)村建設(shè)亟待解決三個問題[N];中國信息報;2007年
7 謝慧;我們要創(chuàng)出自己的品牌[N];經(jīng)濟日報;2008年
8 駐站記者 栗彥明;不看老天臉色吃飯[N];赤峰日報;2008年
9 記者 于險峰 張仁軍;沈陽“千村富民行動”使農(nóng)民四季增收[N];農(nóng)民日報;2006年
10 記者 張興旺 通訊員 施良海 戴大圣;借用兩權(quán)分離法[N];湖北日報;2006年
,本文編號:2162540
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/nongyejingjilunwen/2162540.html