本文選題：城鄉(xiāng)二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu) + 城鄉(xiāng)等值化　； 參考：《河北大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：“城鄉(xiāng)二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)”是發(fā)展中國家工業(yè)化和經(jīng)濟發(fā)展進程中呈現(xiàn)出的一種現(xiàn)代工業(yè)和傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)業(yè)、繁榮城市形態(tài)和相對落后的農(nóng)村形態(tài)并存的一種結(jié)構(gòu)性不平衡狀態(tài)。自從1954年劉易斯提出以來,城鄉(xiāng)二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)換問題就成為發(fā)展經(jīng)濟學(xué)重要的理論命題。從偏重城市和工業(yè)部門的發(fā)展,到重視農(nóng)村農(nóng)業(yè),再到城鄉(xiāng)關(guān)系融合均衡發(fā)展,二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)換理論看似經(jīng)歷了一個否定之否定的發(fā)展過程,但主要的思路依然限定于:工業(yè)化——產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)換——勞動力轉(zhuǎn)移——城市化的路徑來消除城鄉(xiāng)“差別”實現(xiàn)城鄉(xiāng)和工農(nóng)的“統(tǒng)一”,以至于在實踐中出現(xiàn)了鄉(xiāng)村與城市、農(nóng)業(yè)與工業(yè)單向轉(zhuǎn)換的無差別的“同質(zhì)化”發(fā)展,即工業(yè)擠壓農(nóng)業(yè)、城市侵占鄉(xiāng)村的現(xiàn)象,二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)非但無法消解,反而更加固化。因此傳統(tǒng)的理論與思路必須要反思:從工業(yè)化到城市化,城鄉(xiāng)二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)不會必然消解;傳統(tǒng)的理論也不具有普適性,對諸如中國這樣的發(fā)展中大國尤其如此。因此,探索城鄉(xiāng)二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)換的新理論、新思路具有重大的理論與實踐價值。從中國工業(yè)化的進程來看,城鄉(xiāng)二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)換與傳統(tǒng)的理論是相背離的。城市化滯后工業(yè)化,城鄉(xiāng)二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)長期呈現(xiàn)出一種固化趨勢。破解這一難題,就要在思想認(rèn)識上突破傳統(tǒng)理論的束縛�！俺青l(xiāng)等值化”理念打破城市優(yōu)于農(nóng)村的城鄉(xiāng)二元對立價值取向的束縛,挖掘農(nóng)村農(nóng)業(yè)的發(fā)展?jié)摿?重新定位鄉(xiāng)村在區(qū)域整體發(fā)展系統(tǒng)的主體地位。在核心內(nèi)涵“城鄉(xiāng)居民生活質(zhì)量不同類是等值”下,使城鄉(xiāng)保持差別化地同等發(fā)展,在經(jīng)濟發(fā)展、生活質(zhì)量和公共服務(wù)等各方面達到等值,最終實現(xiàn)城市與鄉(xiāng)村均衡發(fā)展。但“城鄉(xiāng)等值化”理念自1950年提出至今未能發(fā)展成為確定的概念和理論體系,因而本文探究了“城鄉(xiāng)等值化”理念的理論淵源,提煉“城鄉(xiāng)等值化”的理論內(nèi)涵,并構(gòu)建“城鄉(xiāng)等值化”的理念系統(tǒng)和相應(yīng)的衡量指標(biāo)。通過探究實踐“城鄉(xiāng)等值化”理念的必要條件和動力來源,考察“城鄉(xiāng)等值化”在中國二元經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)換的適用性,最后將“城鄉(xiāng)等值化”理念與中國“桃花源”思想融合,提出中國鄉(xiāng)村發(fā)展模式總體構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:The "urban-rural dual economic structure" is a kind of structural imbalance in the process of industrialization and economic development of developing countries, in which modern industry and traditional agriculture, prosperous urban form and relatively backward rural form coexist. Since Lewis put forward in 1954, the transformation of urban-rural dual economic structure has become an important theoretical proposition in development economics. From focusing on the development of cities and industrial sectors to attaching importance to rural agriculture, and then to the balanced development of urban-rural relations, the theory of dual economic structure transformation seems to have undergone a negative development process. But the main train of thought is still limited to: industrialization-industry transformation-labor force transfer-the path of urbanization to eliminate the "difference" between urban and rural areas and realize the "unity" between urban and rural areas and workers and peasants, so that in practice there have been rural and urban areas. The "homogenization" development of the one-way transformation between agriculture and industry, that is, the phenomenon of industry squeezing agriculture and the city invading the countryside, makes the dual economic structure more solidified rather than dispelled. Therefore, the traditional theory and train of thought must reflect: from industrialization to urbanization, the dual economic structure of urban and rural areas will not necessarily be eliminated, and the traditional theory is not universal, especially for developing countries such as China. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical value to explore the new theory of urban-rural dual economic structure transformation. From the process of industrialization in China, the transformation of urban-rural dual economic structure deviates from the traditional theory. Urbanization lags behind industrialization, urban and rural dual economic structure presents a long-term solidification trend. To solve this problem, we must break through the shackles of traditional theory in thinking cognition. The concept of "urban-rural equalization" breaks the shackles of the dualistic value orientation of urban and rural areas which is superior to that of rural areas, excavates the development potential of rural agriculture, and reorientates the main position of rural areas in the whole regional development system. Under the core connotation of "the quality of life of urban and rural residents is equivalent in different categories", the urban and rural areas should be developed in a differentiated and equal way, and the economic development, quality of life and public service should be equal, and the balanced development of the city and the countryside would be realized. However, the concept of "urban-rural equivalence" has not been developed into a definite concept and theoretical system since it was put forward in 1950. Therefore, this paper explores the theoretical origin of the concept of "urban-rural equivalence" and refines the theoretical connotation of "urban-rural equivalence". And construct the concept system of "urban and rural equalization" and the corresponding measurement index. By exploring the necessary conditions and power sources of carrying out the concept of "urban-rural equivalence", this paper explores the applicability of "urban-rural equivalence" in the transformation of dual economic structure in China, and finally merges the idea of "rural-urban equivalence" with the thought of "Taohuayuan" in China. The overall conception of rural development model in China is put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F299.2;F320

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳安華;宋為;周琳;;鄉(xiāng)村風(fēng)貌的城市化現(xiàn)象及其影響因素分析[J];浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2017年01期

2 吳碧波;;國外城鎮(zhèn)化經(jīng)驗借鑒及對中國農(nóng)村地區(qū)的啟示[J];世界農(nóng)業(yè);2017年02期

3 伽紅凱;王思明;王樹進;;中國農(nóng)民集中居住的演進過程與經(jīng)驗借鑒[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟;2016年12期

4 張莉;;特色小鎮(zhèn):城鎮(zhèn)化空間布局新模式[J];環(huán)境經(jīng)濟;2016年ZB期

5 王朝華;;北京城鄉(xiāng)關(guān)系協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的實現(xiàn)路徑[J];經(jīng)濟界;2016年04期

6 李增剛;;城鄉(xiāng)等值化與就地城鎮(zhèn)化[J];城市與環(huán)境研究;2016年02期

7 魏后凱;;新常態(tài)下中國城鄉(xiāng)一體化格局及推進戰(zhàn)略[J];中國農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟;2016年01期

8 李人慶;;從城鄉(xiāng)產(chǎn)業(yè)割裂轉(zhuǎn)向融合發(fā)展——探尋打破二元結(jié)構(gòu)和促進發(fā)展方式轉(zhuǎn)變的可行路徑[J];中國發(fā)展觀察;2015年12期

9 劉彥隨;陳聰;李裕瑞;;中國地級市尺度城鄉(xiāng)等值化發(fā)展的分異規(guī)律（英文）[J];Journal of Geographical Sciences;2015年09期

10 李增剛;;以城鄉(xiāng)等值化實現(xiàn)就地城鎮(zhèn)化——山東青州南張樓村的案例研究[J];理論學(xué)刊;2015年08期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條

1 李增剛;;以城鄉(xiāng)等值化實現(xiàn)就地城鎮(zhèn)化[N];企業(yè)家日報;2016年

2 張勇;;城鄉(xiāng)等值化是城市化發(fā)展的有效途徑[N];中國經(jīng)濟導(dǎo)報;2011年

3 陳新;;挪威如何解決城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展失衡問題[N];經(jīng)濟日報;2006年

4 徐楠;;南張樓沒有答案[N];南方周末;2004年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李超;基于城鄉(xiāng)等值的城鄉(xiāng)關(guān)系格局、機制與路徑研究[D];天津大學(xué);2013年

2 尋廣新;統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)視域中的社會主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)研究[D];中共中央黨校;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 尚利娜;張培剛的農(nóng)業(yè)國工業(yè)化思想研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：1871434