本文選題：生物資產(chǎn) + 信息披露質(zhì)量��； 參考：《浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國是一個發(fā)展中的農(nóng)業(yè)大國,農(nóng)業(yè)上市公司是我國農(nóng)業(yè)企業(yè)先進(jìn)生產(chǎn)力的代表,其會計信息披露備受社會各界信息使用者的關(guān)注。我國農(nóng)業(yè)上市公司具體又劃分為農(nóng)、林、牧、漁業(yè),無論哪個行業(yè),生物資產(chǎn)都在其總資產(chǎn)中占有重要地位。然而我國對生物資產(chǎn)的研究相對較晚,直到2006年我國才頒布了專門的生物資產(chǎn)會計準(zhǔn)則,在《企業(yè)會計準(zhǔn)則第5號—生物資產(chǎn)》頒布后,我國生物資產(chǎn)信息披露狀況較以前有很大程度提高,但很大一部分農(nóng)業(yè)上市公司生物資產(chǎn)信息披露不規(guī)范,影響生物資產(chǎn)信息使用者作出合理經(jīng)濟決策。生物資產(chǎn)問題研究備受會計學(xué)界學(xué)者和各方利益相關(guān)者的關(guān)注。本文主要以生物資產(chǎn)信息披露為切入點,重點研究影響生物資產(chǎn)信息披露質(zhì)量的因素有哪些。在相關(guān)理論研究的基礎(chǔ)之上,對我國42家農(nóng)業(yè)上市公司2013-2015年生物資產(chǎn)信息披露質(zhì)量進(jìn)行評價,評價結(jié)果顯示我國農(nóng)業(yè)上市公司近3年的生物資產(chǎn)信息披露質(zhì)量不高,披露質(zhì)量沒有明顯的提升,而且各農(nóng)業(yè)上市公司披露的質(zhì)量差距很大。通過構(gòu)建計量經(jīng)濟學(xué)模型,以生物資產(chǎn)信息披露的質(zhì)量為被解釋變量,從治理結(jié)構(gòu),公司特征及政府補助幾方面選取了8個解釋變量,另外還有年份、所屬行業(yè)作為控制變量,通過描述性統(tǒng)計及多元回歸分析,得出研究結(jié)果表明,在設(shè)置的影響因素中董事會規(guī)模、財務(wù)杠桿、營運能力及所屬行業(yè)對生物資產(chǎn)信息披露質(zhì)量有顯著的影響。本文在最后根據(jù)實證分析的結(jié)果,結(jié)合樣本公司生物資產(chǎn)信息披露狀況,提出了一些對策建議:完善生物資產(chǎn)信息披露制度,強化市場監(jiān)督力度,完善公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)等。希望能為我國農(nóng)業(yè)上市公司在生物資產(chǎn)信息披露問題上提供一些參考。
[Abstract]:China is a developing agricultural country. Agricultural listed companies are the representatives of the advanced productive forces of agricultural enterprises in our country. The disclosure of accounting information has attracted the attention of the information users from all walks of life. Agricultural listed companies in China are divided into agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery. No matter which industry, biological assets play an important role in their total assets. However, the study of biological assets in our country is relatively late, until 2006, our country only promulgated the special biological assets accounting standards. After the promulgation of the Accounting Standards for Enterprises No. 5-Biological assets, The situation of biological assets information disclosure in China has been improved to a great extent, but a large part of agricultural listed companies' biological assets information disclosure is not standardized, which affects the users of biological assets information to make reasonable economic decisions. The study of biological assets has attracted the attention of accounting scholars and stakeholders. In this paper, biological assets information disclosure as a breakthrough point, focusing on the impact of biological assets information disclosure quality factors. On the basis of relevant theoretical research, the quality of biological assets information disclosure of 42 agricultural listed companies in China from 2013 to 2015 is evaluated. The results show that the quality of information disclosure of biological assets of agricultural listed companies in China in recent three years is not high. The quality of disclosure has not been significantly improved, and the quality of agricultural listed companies is very different. By constructing econometrics model, taking the quality of information disclosure of biological assets as explained variable, eight explanatory variables are selected from governance structure, company characteristics and government subsidy. In addition, the industry belongs to the industry as a control variable. Through descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis, the results show that the size of the board of directors, financial leverage, operating ability and industry have a significant impact on the quality of information disclosure of biological assets. Finally, according to the results of empirical analysis and combined with the situation of biological assets information disclosure of sample companies, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions: to perfect the disclosure system of biological assets information, to strengthen market supervision, and to perfect the corporate governance structure. This paper hopes to provide some references for agricultural listed companies in the issue of biological assets information disclosure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F324;F302.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳凡璐;符剛;任琪祺;彭麓霖;;農(nóng)業(yè)上市公司生物資產(chǎn)信息披露質(zhì)量評價[J];財會通訊;2016年22期

2 賈崢;劉梅娟;謝幫生;;低碳經(jīng)濟背景下的生物資產(chǎn)準(zhǔn)則探微[J];財會月刊;2015年20期

3 賴惠明;;農(nóng)業(yè)類上市公司生物資產(chǎn)披露實證分析[J];財會月刊;2015年11期

4 林俊杰;周愛國;;上市公司生物資產(chǎn)信息披露效應(yīng)綜述[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2015年06期

5 張心靈;胡海川;范文娟;;歷史成本計量屬性下生物資產(chǎn)信息披露模式探討[J];會計之友;2015年04期

6 胡海川;張心靈;;公允價值計量下生物資產(chǎn)信息披露模式探討[J];財會月刊;2015年03期

7 胡海川;張心靈;;農(nóng)業(yè)類上市公司生物資產(chǎn)信息披露模式探討[J];石家莊經(jīng)濟學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年06期

8 胡玉可;田治威;;林業(yè)生物資產(chǎn)會計信息披露的改良探討——基于利益相關(guān)者的需求識別分析[J];會計之友;2014年35期

9 高增榮;吳啟富;;上市公司信息披露質(zhì)量影響因素的實證分析——以深圳主板上市公司為例[J];中國商貿(mào);2014年22期

10 胡玉可;田治威;李偉;;林業(yè)上市公司生物資產(chǎn)會計信息披露問題與對策[J];江西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 范文娟;我國生物資產(chǎn)價值評估方法研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 唐清婉;生物資產(chǎn)會計信息披露質(zhì)量評價指標(biāo)體系研究[D];四川農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

2 羅超;中國農(nóng)業(yè)上市公司生物資產(chǎn)信息披露質(zhì)量評價研究[D];四川農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

3 王妍妍;上市公司會計信息披露質(zhì)量評價指標(biāo)體系研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1810652