本文選題：宅基地　切入點：宅基地使用權　出處：《四川師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：農(nóng)村宅基地是農(nóng)村土地中的重要部分,是農(nóng)民基于居住的目的,申請建造住宅而使用的集體土地,農(nóng)民享有使用權。一方面,我國法律限制了宅基地使用權的流轉,引起了宅基地大量閑置、“空心村”現(xiàn)象等問題;另一方面,城鎮(zhèn)化進程對土地資源的需求日益增長。為了集約利用土地,優(yōu)化資源配置,我們國家從2004年的《國發(fā)[2004]28號》文件開始到2017年的中央一號文件,期間頒布了多項關于宅基地制度改革等一系列政策文件,來加強農(nóng)村宅基地使用權的合法流轉,并在中央政策的指導下,各地都在積極探索有效的宅基地使用權流轉試點。本文通過總結現(xiàn)有宅基地使用權流轉試點模式,按照流轉價格制定的主體對其分類,分為政府主導型、市場主導型、農(nóng)民集體主導型三種流轉模式,結合制度變遷理論對各模式的制度變遷動因和制度供給主體進行比較分析,得出政府主導型和市場主導型流轉模式的制度變遷路徑是強制性制度變遷路徑,農(nóng)民集體主導型流轉模式是誘致性制度變遷路徑的結論,并結合流轉試點案例對三種模式的運行機制、成本分擔和收益分配進行比較,從制度環(huán)境、制度內(nèi)容以及制度效率進行總結,從不同的角度考慮,不同的流轉模式各有利弊,因此在當前的國情背景下,應因地制宜的并審慎穩(wěn)妥的進行宅基地使用權流轉試點,并通過相關政策將各種流轉模式進行完善,確保農(nóng)民利益,從而促進宅基地使用權的流轉。
[Abstract]:The rural homestead is an important part of the rural land. It is the collective land used by the peasants for the purpose of living, and the peasants have the right to use it.On the one hand, the law of our country has restricted the circulation of the right to use the homestead, which has caused a large number of idle homestead, "hollow village" and other problems; on the other hand, the demand for land resources in the process of urbanization is increasing day by day.In order to make intensive use of land and optimize the allocation of resources, our country began from the document "Guofa [2004] 28" in 2004 to the first document of the Central Committee in 2017, during which a number of policy documents on the reform of the homestead system were promulgated.To strengthen the legal circulation of rural homestead use right, and under the guidance of central policy, all localities are actively exploring effective homestead use right transfer pilot.This paper summarizes the existing land use right transfer pilot model, according to the circulation price of the main body of the classification, divided into government-led, market-oriented, farmers collective dominated three circulation models,Combining with the theory of institutional change, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the drivers of institutional change and the main body of institutional supply of each mode, and concludes that the path of institutional change of government-led and market-oriented circulation mode is compulsory institutional vicissitude.The farmer collective dominant circulation mode is the conclusion that induces the institutional change path, and unifies the circulation pilot case to carry on the comparison to the three modes' operation mechanism, the cost sharing and the income distribution, from the system environment,The content of the system and the efficiency of the system are summarized. Considering from different angles, different circulation modes have their own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, under the background of the current national conditions, we should carry out pilot projects of the circulation of the right to use the homestead in accordance with local conditions and prudently and steadily.And through the relevant policies to improve the circulation model, to ensure the interests of farmers, thereby promoting the circulation of homestead use rights.
【學位授予單位】：四川師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F321.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 夏克勤;;宅基地流轉改革的價值趨向與改革路徑[J];江西社會科學;2016年09期

2 楊雅婷;;我國宅基地有償使用制度探索與構建[J];南開學報(哲學社會科學版);2016年04期

3 劉亞偉;;農(nóng)村宅基地制度改革背景下農(nóng)民安置房模式的探析[J];東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2016年S1期

4 楊英法;;中國農(nóng)村宅基地產(chǎn)權制度研究[J];社會科學家;2016年02期

5 方明;;農(nóng)村宅基地使用權流轉機制研究[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟探討;2014年08期

6 張夢琳;;農(nóng)村宅基地流轉模式分析與制度選擇[J];經(jīng)濟體制改革;2014年03期

7 于建嶸;;要讓農(nóng)村宅基地流轉起來[J];探索與爭鳴;2014年02期

8 薛鳳蕊;;農(nóng)村宅基地占用與流轉制度創(chuàng)新[J];開放導報;2014年01期

9 張波;;城鎮(zhèn)化背景下宅基地使用權流轉法律問題研究[J];人民論壇;2013年20期

10 呂軍書;杜蔥茂;;我國農(nóng)村宅基地使用權流轉的立法現(xiàn)狀與司法實踐分析——兼論農(nóng)村宅基地流轉的途徑[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2013年07期

，

本文編號：1701321