債務(wù)重組準(zhǔn)則的應(yīng)用研究
[Abstract]:On February 15, 2006, the accounting standards for enterprises issued by the Ministry of Finance include 1 basic accounting standard and 38 specific accounting standards. The issue of accounting standards has realized the substantive convergence with the international financial reporting standards, which is a new milestone in the history of accounting development in China. The accounting standards issued this time are much different from the original accounting standards, one of which is debt restructuring standards. Since its promulgation in 1998, the debt restructuring guidelines have undergone two major revisions in 2001 and 2006. The revision process of the standards is a process of balancing the quality characteristics of accounting information and reliability, and is also the result of a game between listed companies and relevant regulatory authorities. The debt restructuring standards issued in 1998 and 2001 are implemented in practice. There are more serious earnings management phenomenon. Under the background of international convergence of accounting standards, the debt restructuring standards were revised again in 2006 to reintroduce fair value and take debt restructuring gains and losses into account in the current period. However, there are still many problems in the actual implementation. By introducing the changing process of debt restructuring criterion, with the help of game theory and accounting rent-seeking theory, this paper points out the problems existing in the actual implementation of the current debt restructuring standards in China: the difficulty in defining the financial difficulties of enterprises; Fair value is still difficult to accurately measure; increase the tax burden of debtors; many enterprises, especially those in the St category, still use debt restructuring for earnings management, regard debt restructuring as a "life-saving straw" for an enterprise, and achieve the purpose of preserving the shell, etc. The causes of these problems are analyzed, such as defects in the formulation of debt restructuring criteria, imperfect market system, lax government supervision, and so on. At the end of this paper, some suggestions on how to solve these problems and how to improve the debt restructuring criteria are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:F233
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李玲;陳任武;;盈余管理與審計質(zhì)量相關(guān)性研究述評[J];財會通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2005年12期
2 謝海洋;;2001年債務(wù)重組準(zhǔn)則盈余管理誘因?qū)嵶C檢驗[J];財會通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2006年01期
3 藍(lán)文永;姚旋;;債務(wù)重組準(zhǔn)則的合理性分析[J];財會通訊(學(xué)術(shù)版);2008年01期
4 孫光國;莫冬燕;;債務(wù)重組損益:何去何從——由新債務(wù)重組準(zhǔn)則執(zhí)行情況引發(fā)的思考[J];財務(wù)與會計;2010年01期
5 程金華;;新債務(wù)重組準(zhǔn)則實施問題原因探究及建議[J];中國管理信息化;2009年10期
6 王建剛;朱金一;;債務(wù)重組準(zhǔn)則的變化及其原因分析[J];廣西財經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期
7 姚麗;劉曉偉;;債務(wù)重組稅務(wù)處理所得及其確認(rèn)[J];財會通訊;2010年31期
8 齊芬霞;馬晨佳;;基于新債務(wù)重組準(zhǔn)則的盈余管理實證研究[J];經(jīng)濟問題;2009年11期
9 樓繼偉;;中國企業(yè)會計準(zhǔn)則建設(shè)的可貴實踐和嶄新突破[J];會計研究;2006年02期
10 汪靜;馬廣爍;宋昊;;債務(wù)重組對上市公司經(jīng)營狀況及利潤的影響——基于“*ST金化”債務(wù)重組的案例分析[J];財會研究;2010年09期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 盧婧;《債務(wù)重組》會計準(zhǔn)則的修訂與盈余管理[D];清華大學(xué);2005年
2 閆磊;債務(wù)重組準(zhǔn)則變遷及其經(jīng)濟后果研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué);2010年
本文編號:2152695
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/kuaiji/2152695.html