本文選題：會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷　切入點(diǎn)：盈余管理　出處：《重慶工商大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國于2006年頒布了企業(yè)會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則，對企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表編制產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)的影響。與企業(yè)會計(jì)制度相比，企業(yè)會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則無論是在形式上還是內(nèi)容上都發(fā)生和很大的改變。與此同時，企業(yè)盈余管理手段等也發(fā)生了較大的變化，，而注冊會計(jì)師作為對企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表發(fā)表審計(jì)意見的獨(dú)立第三方，能否在準(zhǔn)則頒發(fā)的情況下有效的識別企業(yè)盈余管理行為，進(jìn)而發(fā)表恰當(dāng)?shù)膶徲?jì)意見顯得尤為重要。因此，在企業(yè)會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則頒布的背景下，本文嘗試研究企業(yè)盈余管理和審計(jì)意見的關(guān)系在準(zhǔn)則變遷前后有何變化，以探討會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷是否能夠提高注冊會計(jì)師識別企業(yè)盈余管理的能力。 本文以2001-2012年我國所有A股上市公司為研究對象，剔除金融行業(yè)的公司、在這12年中新上市或已退市的公司、被ST和PT的公司以及資料不全、數(shù)據(jù)無法取得的公司后，最終獲得了788家有效公司樣本、9456個審計(jì)意見以及其他相關(guān)變量數(shù)據(jù)，以此來研究會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷、盈余管理與審計(jì)意見的關(guān)系，進(jìn)而探討會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷下注冊會計(jì)師識別企業(yè)盈余管理能力的變化情況。經(jīng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷前，審計(jì)意見和盈余管理的相關(guān)性不大，說明注冊會計(jì)師不能夠有效識別企業(yè)的盈余管理行為；會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷后，審計(jì)意見和盈余管理正相關(guān)，表明注冊會計(jì)師在會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷后識別企業(yè)盈余管理行為的能力有所提高。根據(jù)研究結(jié)果，本文分別從上市公司應(yīng)該優(yōu)化治理結(jié)構(gòu)、加強(qiáng)內(nèi)部控制規(guī)范的建立，注冊會計(jì)師應(yīng)加強(qiáng)獨(dú)立性和對企業(yè)盈余管理的識別能力以及監(jiān)管方應(yīng)加強(qiáng)會計(jì)、審計(jì)相關(guān)法律體系的建設(shè)等方面提出政策建議。 本文共分為六章進(jìn)行研究，各章的研究內(nèi)容簡述如下：第1章為緒論，主要介紹了本文的研究背景、研究的理論意義及實(shí)際意義、研究內(nèi)容和研究框架、研究方法和本研究的主要創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)；第2章為理論基礎(chǔ)和文獻(xiàn)綜述，本部分先從制度變遷、演化博弈論兩方面闡述了會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷的理論基礎(chǔ)，從信息不對稱理論、委托代理理論及產(chǎn)權(quán)理論來闡述盈余管理的理論基礎(chǔ)，并對企業(yè)盈余管理進(jìn)行了概念界定，為本文的研究打下了理論基礎(chǔ)和概念基礎(chǔ)，然后歸納整理了會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則、盈余管理和審計(jì)意見等相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的研究文獻(xiàn)，并對這些文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行了述評，從而找到本文的研究方向；第3章為理論基礎(chǔ)和研究假設(shè)；第4章是實(shí)證分析，該部分介紹了研究樣本、數(shù)據(jù)來源和實(shí)證分析工具，并設(shè)計(jì)出相關(guān)變量；對審計(jì)意見變量進(jìn)行描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)、自變量相關(guān)性分析、Logistic回歸檢驗(yàn)結(jié)果和分析，檢驗(yàn)和分析各研究變量對審計(jì)意見的影響方向和程度；第5章是本文的研究結(jié)論與政策建議，該部分根據(jù)實(shí)證研究結(jié)果對本文的研究作出結(jié)論，并從上市公司、注冊會計(jì)師以及監(jiān)管方三方面提出政策建議，并指出本文的研究局限。
[Abstract]:In 2006, our country promulgated the enterprise accounting standard, which had a profound influence on the enterprise financial statement compilation. Compared with the enterprise accounting system, the enterprise accounting standard has taken place and changed greatly in both form and content. At the same time, However, the CPA, as an independent third party that issued an audit opinion on the financial statements of the enterprise, can effectively identify the earnings management behavior of the enterprise under the circumstance of issuing the standards. Therefore, in the context of the promulgation of accounting standards for enterprises, this paper attempts to study the relationship between earnings management and audit opinions before and after the change of standards. In order to explore whether the change of accounting standards can improve the ability of CPA to identify the earnings management of enterprises. This paper takes all the A-share listed companies in China from 2001-2012 as the research object, excludes the companies in the financial industry, after 12 years of newly listed or delisted companies, the companies with St and PT and companies whose data are incomplete and unable to obtain the data. Finally, 788 valid company samples, 9456 audit opinions and other relevant variable data were obtained to study the relationship between accounting standards change, earnings management and audit opinion. Then it discusses the change of CPA's ability to identify enterprise earnings management under the change of accounting standards. After the study, it is found that the audit opinion and earnings management have little relevance before accounting standards change. It shows that CPA can not effectively identify the earnings management behavior of enterprises. After accounting standards change, audit opinions are positively related to earnings management. It shows that CPA's ability to identify earnings management behavior has been improved after accounting standard changes. According to the results of the research, this paper proposes to optimize the governance structure of listed companies and strengthen the establishment of internal control norms. The CPA should strengthen the independence and the ability to identify the earnings management of the enterprise, and the supervisor should strengthen the construction of the accounting and auditing legal system, and put forward some policy suggestions. This paper is divided into six chapters, the research content of each chapter is summarized as follows: chapter 1 is the introduction, mainly introduces the research background, theoretical and practical significance of the study, research content and research framework, Chapter 2 is the theoretical basis and literature review. This part first expounds the theoretical basis of accounting standard change from two aspects: institutional change, evolutionary game theory, and information asymmetry theory. The principal-agent theory and property right theory explain the theoretical basis of earnings management, and define the concept of earnings management of enterprises, lay a theoretical and conceptual basis for the study of this paper, and then summarize the accounting standards. Chapter 3 is the theoretical basis and research hypothesis, chapter 4 is the empirical analysis, and review the relevant research literature in earnings management and audit opinion, and find out the research direction of this paper; chapter 3 is the theoretical basis and research hypothesis; chapter 4 is the empirical analysis. This part introduces the research samples, data sources and empirical analysis tools, and designs the relevant variables, carries out descriptive statistics on audit opinion variables, analyzes the correlation of independent variables and logistic regression test results. Chapter 5 is the conclusions and policy recommendations of this paper, which is based on the empirical research results, and draws a conclusion from listed companies. CPA and regulators put forward three aspects of policy recommendations, and pointed out the limitations of this study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F233;F275

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白憲生;田新翠;;上市公司盈余管理與審計(jì)意見關(guān)系研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2012年07期

2 王虹;楊丹;;會計(jì)準(zhǔn)則變遷、公司治理對盈余管理的影響分析——基于結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2011年09期

3 宋建波,陳華昀;我國注冊會計(jì)師審計(jì)與上市公司盈余管理研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2005年03期

4 李維安,王新漢,王威;盈余管理與審計(jì)意見關(guān)系的實(shí)證研究——基于非經(jīng)營性收益的分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2004年11期

5 杜興強(qiáng);溫日光;;公司治理與會計(jì)信息質(zhì)量:一項(xiàng)經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2007年01期

6 劉偉;劉星;;審計(jì)師變更、盈余操縱與審計(jì)師獨(dú)立性——來自中國A股上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];管理世界;2007年09期

7 余玉苗;中國上市公司審計(jì)市場結(jié)構(gòu)的初步分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)評論;2001年03期

8 吳溪;我國證券審計(jì)市場的集中度與注冊會計(jì)師獨(dú)立性[J];中國注冊會計(jì)師;2001年09期

9 陸建橋;中國虧損上市公司盈余管理實(shí)證研究[J];會計(jì)研究;1999年09期

10 耿建新,楊鶴;我國上市公司變更會計(jì)師事務(wù)所情況的分析[J];會計(jì)研究;2001年04期

本文編號：1617048