本文選題：重建個(gè)人所有制 + 個(gè)人��； 參考：《新疆大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：馬克思曾在《資本論》中寫到“重新建立個(gè)人所有制”。杜林曾稱之為“深?yuàn)W的辯證法之謎”,我國學(xué)術(shù)界也討論了多年,但眾說紛紜,難以達(dá)成一致。諸學(xué)者對(duì)“重建個(gè)人所有制”的解讀基本上都是從現(xiàn)存的所有制中去求解,把馬克思的“個(gè)人所有制”概念與已經(jīng)在實(shí)踐中存在的“公有制”或“私有制”概念進(jìn)行比照、對(duì)接,僅僅從經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域去求解。此外,對(duì)馬克思“重建個(gè)人所有制”的解讀,不是從馬克思所預(yù)想的未來理想的“自由人聯(lián)合體”條件下人自身的自由與解放去思考,大多脫離馬克思對(duì)未來社會(huì)國家、階級(jí)消亡的理論預(yù)設(shè),脫離馬克思關(guān)于人的自由而全面發(fā)展的理想狀況,這就必然會(huì)陷于“公共所有”與“個(gè)人所有”的二律背反。所以,對(duì)于馬克思“重建個(gè)人所有制”的理解必須從人的發(fā)展角度去解析。 本文研究馬克思“重建個(gè)人所有制”要突破只側(cè)重從政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的視角對(duì)“重建個(gè)人所有制”中的“所有制”進(jìn)行的解讀,而是從馬克思的人學(xué)視野,全面、辯證、合理、客觀的解讀“重建個(gè)人所有制”。 第一章將從人學(xué)視野闡明“重建個(gè)人所有制”的人學(xué)意蘊(yùn)。首先,從哲學(xué)的角度,論述人與所有制的關(guān)系;其次,論述所有制的歷史演變與人的發(fā)展的三種形態(tài)的辯證統(tǒng)一;最后,重點(diǎn)論述“重建個(gè)人所有制”的人學(xué)意蘊(yùn),即:“重建個(gè)人所有制”是勞動(dòng)者為主體的所有制、是勞動(dòng)者共同占有的所有制、是自由人聯(lián)合的所有制。 第二章是本文的重點(diǎn)、難點(diǎn)和創(chuàng)新點(diǎn),對(duì)“重建個(gè)人所有制”中的“個(gè)人”進(jìn)行人學(xué)的合理解讀與分析。首先,“個(gè)人”是占有生產(chǎn)資料的勞動(dòng)者;其次,“個(gè)人”是自由人聯(lián)合體的“自由人”;最后,“個(gè)人”是揚(yáng)棄異化的“個(gè)人”。 第三章論述“重建個(gè)人所有制”的人學(xué)意義。首先,聯(lián)系當(dāng)前我國的實(shí)際,提出貫徹以人為本、不斷完善所有制形式是“重建個(gè)人所有制”的當(dāng)代意義;其次,闡述“重建個(gè)人所有制”是為了人的自由而全面發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Marx once wrote in Capital, "Re-establishing individual ownership." Du Lin once called it "the mystery of profound dialectics", which has been discussed for many years in our academic circles, but it is difficult to reach a consensus. The scholars' interpretation of "rebuilding individual ownership" is basically solved from the existing ownership, comparing Marx's concept of "individual ownership" with the concept of "public ownership" or "private ownership" that already exists in practice. Docking, only from the economic field to solve. In addition, the interpretation of Marx's "rebuilding individual ownership" does not reflect on the freedom and liberation of human beings under the conditions of Marx's ideal "free man union" in the future, and is mostly divorced from Marx's view of the future social state. The theoretical presupposition of class extinction, which deviates from Marx's ideal state of free and all-round development of human beings, will inevitably lead to the reverse of "public ownership" and "individual ownership". Therefore, Marx's understanding of "rebuilding individual ownership" must be analyzed from the perspective of human development. This article studies Marx's "reconstruction of individual ownership" to break through the interpretation of "ownership" in "rebuilding individual ownership" from the perspective of political economy, but from Marx's perspective of human studies, comprehensive, dialectical and reasonable. Objective interpretation of "Reconstruction of individual ownership". The first chapter will expound the humanistic implication of "rebuilding individual ownership" from the perspective of humanism. First, from a philosophical point of view, it discusses the relationship between human and ownership; secondly, it discusses the historical evolution of ownership and the dialectical unity of three forms of human development; finally, it focuses on the human implications of "rebuilding individual ownership". That is to say, "rebuilding individual ownership" is the ownership of laborer as the main body, the ownership of common possession of the laborer and the joint ownership of the free person. The second chapter is the emphases, difficulties and innovations of this paper, the reasonable interpretation and analysis of "individual" in "rebuilding individual ownership". First, the "individual" is the laborer who possesses the means of production; secondly, the "individual" is the "free person" of the Commonwealth of Free people; finally, the "individual" is the "individual" who subtracts the alienation. The third chapter discusses the humanistic significance of rebuilding individual ownership. First of all, according to the reality of our country, it is the contemporary significance of "rebuilding individual ownership" to carry out people-oriented and constantly perfect the form of ownership, and secondly, to expound that "rebuilding individual ownership" is to develop in an all-round way for the sake of man's freedom.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：F091.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周德海;;馬克思的重建個(gè)人所有制與社會(huì)主義的公有制[J];安徽電氣工程職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

2 李韋;張?chǎng)?;析馬克思的“重建個(gè)人所有制”思想[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

3 汝秀梅;;略論馬克思哲學(xué)的人學(xué)觀[J];東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

4 衛(wèi)興華;;對(duì)“重建個(gè)人所有制”的解讀、評(píng)論與爭(zhēng)鳴的一些看法——兼談王成稼研究員對(duì)“重建個(gè)人所有制”不同解讀的批評(píng)和有關(guān)觀點(diǎn)[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年01期

5 蔣南平;帥曉林;;“重建個(gè)人所有制”理論的歷史沉思及其在中國的實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年02期

6 王成稼;;按馬克思的原意解讀“個(gè)人所有制”的內(nèi)涵——復(fù)衛(wèi)興華教授的第二次批評(píng)與指正[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年04期

7 衛(wèi)興華;;究竟怎樣理解馬克思提出的“重建個(gè)人所有制”的理論觀點(diǎn)——再評(píng)王成稼先生的有關(guān)見解和辯駁[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年06期

8 吳玉;;馬克思人學(xué)理論研究的三個(gè)維度及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

9 郭毅;唐文佩;;馬克思人的發(fā)展與人的解放理論及其現(xiàn)實(shí)意義[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2010年06期

10 王成稼;;三論“重建個(gè)人所有制”逐步實(shí)現(xiàn)“共同富�！薄獜�(fù)衛(wèi)興華教授的第二次批評(píng)與指正[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1933949