反思和重塑馬克思勞動(dòng)理論的三重路徑——以奈格里為中心
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-21 04:17
本文選題:勞動(dòng) + 本源性的主體創(chuàng)構(gòu)力量; 參考:《江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué)》2012年05期
【摘要】:奈格里立足勞動(dòng)-工人階級(jí)和工作-資產(chǎn)階級(jí)的對(duì)抗邏輯,把勞動(dòng)視為單純的主體創(chuàng)造能力和獲得自由的現(xiàn)實(shí)根源,將馬克思的勞動(dòng)理論重構(gòu)為以本源性、創(chuàng)構(gòu)性和絕對(duì)革命為核心的激進(jìn)主體理論,強(qiáng)調(diào)制憲力的主體化和政治的社會(huì)化,拒絕黑格爾與馬克思的任何連接。阿倫特對(duì)勞動(dòng)-工作的區(qū)分與奈格里完全不同,她把勞動(dòng)描述成滿足人類生命需求的活動(dòng)和默認(rèn)暴力的前政治活動(dòng),認(rèn)為馬克思將自由等同于勞動(dòng)解放,進(jìn)而明確與社會(huì)相分離的政治之自主性和制憲原則的非對(duì)抗本性。盧卡奇和奈格里一樣致力于馬克思主義的本體論轉(zhuǎn)向,他立足實(shí)踐的社會(huì)歷史范式,將勞動(dòng)重塑為立足歷史性、人之主體性和去目的論的歷史-社會(huì)本體,恢復(fù)馬克思主義中的黑格爾因素,最終割裂勞動(dòng)-生產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域和政治革命。三者基于特定的理論立場(chǎng),遮蔽或弱化了馬克思勞動(dòng)理論的科學(xué)內(nèi)涵。
[Abstract]:Based on the antagonistic logic of the labour-working class and the working-bourgeoisie, Negree regarded labor as the real source of pure subjective creative ability and freedom, and reconstructed Marx's labor theory into its origin. The radical subject theory, which is centered on creation and absolute revolution, emphasizes the subjectivity of constitutional power and the socialization of politics, and rejects any connection between Hegel and Marx. Arendt's distinction between labor and work is completely different from that of Negree, who describes labor as an activity to meet the needs of human life and a pre-political activity that acquiesces to violence, arguing that Marx equated freedom with labor liberation. Then the political autonomy separated from society and the non-confrontational nature of constitution-making principle are clarified. Lukacs, like Nigri, is committed to the ontological turn of Marxism. Based on the social and historical paradigm of practice, Lukacs remoulds labor as a historical and social ontology based on history, human subjectivity and deteleology. To restore the Hegel factor in Marxism and finally to separate the labor-production field and the political revolution. On the basis of specific theoretical standpoint, they obscure or weaken the scientific connotation of Marx's labor theory.
【作者單位】: 河南大學(xué)哲學(xué)與公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】:國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“奈格里與拉克勞政治本體論比較研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):12CZX004)階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】:A811;F091.91
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳燕君;;盧卡奇的總體性思想意蘊(yùn)初探[J];安徽電氣工程職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期
2 任f,
本文編號(hào):1780893
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jjsxs/1780893.html
最近更新
教材專著