本文選題：《資本論》　切入點：政治經(jīng)濟學(xué)　出處：《經(jīng)濟縱橫》2013年12期

【摘要】：最近一二十年來,在我國政治經(jīng)濟學(xué)領(lǐng)域,傳統(tǒng)馬列主義政治經(jīng)濟學(xué)發(fā)展遭遇瓶頸。究其根本原因,在于沒有全面準確地解讀《資本論》,把馬克思《資本論》的理論貢獻僅僅看成是剩余價值論,且將剩余價值理論僅僅解讀為揭示雇傭工人受剝削秘密的"剝削論",與我國社會主義市場經(jīng)濟的現(xiàn)實形成了嚴重悖論。必須從根本上消除對《資本論》的誤讀誤解,正本清源,充分認識到馬克思《資本論》具有資源優(yōu)化配置和剩余價值兩大理論貢獻,其勞動價值論和剩余價值論本身也有優(yōu)化配置社會資源的重要機制,以此重構(gòu)馬列主義政治經(jīng)濟學(xué),增強其在現(xiàn)代市場經(jīng)濟中的生命力。
[Abstract]:In the last ten or twenty years, the development of traditional Marxism-Leninist political economy has encountered a bottleneck in the field of political economy in China.The fundamental reason lies in the lack of a comprehensive and accurate interpretation of "Capital", and the fact that Marx's theoretical contribution to "Capital" is only regarded as the theory of surplus value.Moreover, the theory of surplus value is only interpreted as a "theory of exploitation" which reveals the secret of the exploitation of employed workers, which forms a serious paradox with the reality of our socialist market economy.It is necessary to fundamentally eliminate misreading misunderstandings of "Capital", clear the root of the matter, and fully realize that Marx's "Capital" has two theoretical contributions: the optimal allocation of resources and the value of surplus.Its labor value theory and surplus value theory also have an important mechanism for optimizing the allocation of social resources in order to reconstruct Marxism-Leninist political economy and enhance its vitality in the modern market economy.
【作者單位】： 中共上海市委黨校理論經(jīng)濟學(xué)研究所;
【分類號】：F091.91

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 鞠立新;;關(guān)注國際馬克思研究的新動向——MEGA2版即新版《馬克思恩格斯全集》出版介評[J];中共中央黨校學(xué)報;2007年03期

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 祝令建,李連廣;也談內(nèi)戰(zhàn)前美國南部種植園經(jīng)濟的性質(zhì)[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2000年04期

2 楊杰;;文藝美學(xué):當代文藝研究的學(xué)科增長點[J];北方論叢;2009年01期

3 于，

本文編號：1692397