【摘要】：信用評級是投資者和評級結(jié)果使用者了解債券等投資工具信用狀況的方法,它以評級理論為依托,以科學的評級方法為指導,來對企業(yè)或者企業(yè)發(fā)行的債券進行評級,進而揭示信用風險。信用評級在市場化的發(fā)展中是不可或缺的一部分,隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的不斷加速,提升我國第三方信用評級機構(gòu)的水平就成了當務之急,對企業(yè)和債券進行準確的評級是評級機構(gòu)對整個市場的責任。本文主要應用案例分析和對比分析的方法,針對案例進行分析,分析了第三方評級機構(gòu)對被評級企業(yè)發(fā)行的債券進行評級的問題。本文緒論介紹研究背景和意義、研究思路和方法、文獻綜述、論文的創(chuàng)新與不足;第一章,介紹了評級機構(gòu)大公國際資信評估有限公司和被評級的債券——昆明滇池投資有限責任公司發(fā)行的“13滇投債/PR滇投債”的基本情況,以及介紹了大公資信對該債券信用評級的過程;第二章,通過穆迪公司評級方法對13滇投債券的評級應用,對比分析了穆迪與大公資信評級方法,指出了大公資信基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施行業(yè)公司債券評級方法的優(yōu)勢與不足;第三章,對于基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施信用評級方法給出了發(fā)展建議。本文以大公資信對昆明滇池投資有限責任公司發(fā)行的“13滇投債/PR滇投債”評級為案例,描述了大公資信依據(jù)發(fā)布的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施行業(yè)公司債券評級方法對該債券進行評級的過程,并通過與國際信用評級公司穆迪的評級方法比較,提出了對基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施行業(yè)公司債券評級方法的進一步改進建議。力圖通過本文的案例分析和對基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施行業(yè)公司債券評級方法的探索,為我國信用評級公司對基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施行業(yè)公司債券的評級方法提供參考,為我國評級機構(gòu)建立針對性的行業(yè)評級方法提供借鑒意見。
[Abstract]:Credit rating is a method for investors and users of rating results to understand the credit status of investment instruments such as bonds. It is based on rating theory and guided by scientific rating methods to rate bonds issued by enterprises or enterprises. Then reveals the credit risk. Credit rating is an indispensable part in the development of marketization. With the continuous acceleration of the development of our market economy, it is imperative to upgrade the level of third-party credit rating agencies in our country. Accurate ratings of companies and bonds are the responsibility of rating agencies to the market as a whole. This paper mainly applies the method of case analysis and contrast analysis, and analyzes the problem of the third party rating agencies' rating of the bonds issued by the rated enterprises. The introduction of this paper introduces the research background and significance, research ideas and methods, literature review, innovation and shortcomings of the paper. This paper introduces the basic situation of Dagong International Credit Appraisal Co., Ltd and the rated bond issued by Kunming Dianchi Investment Co., Ltd. In chapter two, the credit rating methods of Moody's and Dagong are compared and analyzed through the application of Moody's rating method to 13Dian bonds. This paper points out the advantages and disadvantages of the bond rating method of Dagong credit infrastructure industry, and gives some suggestions for the development of the credit rating method for infrastructure in the third chapter. This paper describes the process of Dagong Credit rating of "13 Dian Investment Bond / PR Dian Investment Bond" issued by Kunming Dianchi Investment Co., Ltd., which is issued by Dagong Credit Corporation, and describes the process of Dagong Credit rating according to the bond rating method of infrastructure industry company issued by Dagong Credit. By comparing with the rating method of international credit rating company Moody's, the paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the method of corporate bond rating in infrastructure industry. Through the case analysis of this paper and the exploration of the corporate bond rating method of the infrastructure industry, this paper provides a reference for the credit rating company of our country to the corporate bond rating method of the infrastructure industry. It provides reference for China's rating agencies to establish targeted industry rating methods.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F832.51

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜葉倩;;指標簡化方法的探討——以信用評級為例[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2016年35期

2 李思維;;大數(shù)據(jù)分析方法在量化評級中的應用探討[J];時代金融;2016年33期

3 牛萌;;中國債券資信評級市場的發(fā)展研究[J];財經(jīng)界(學術(shù)版);2016年18期

4 吳國梁;;我國信用評級業(yè)存在的問題及應對策略[J];中國市場;2016年33期

5 李丹;;信用評級規(guī)范發(fā)展的國際借鑒[J];征信;2016年08期

6 劉雨晨;;公司債的評級方法要引入社會責任因素[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2016年05期

7 李丹;;國際評級行業(yè)發(fā)展與監(jiān)管動態(tài)[J];金融市場研究;2015年08期

8 卿固;辛超群;;信用評級方法模型的選擇策略研究[J];天津商務職業(yè)學院學報;2015年04期

9 彭星;;我國債券評級市場發(fā)展研究[J];武漢金融;2015年06期

10 郭濂;;國際三大信用評級機構(gòu)的比較研究[J];中南財經(jīng)政法大學學報;2015年01期

，

本文編號：2150211