【摘要】：信用評(píng)級(jí)是投資者和評(píng)級(jí)結(jié)果使用者了解債券等投資工具信用狀況的方法,它以評(píng)級(jí)理論為依托,以科學(xué)的評(píng)級(jí)方法為指導(dǎo),來(lái)對(duì)企業(yè)或者企業(yè)發(fā)行的債券進(jìn)行評(píng)級(jí),進(jìn)而揭示信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。信用評(píng)級(jí)在市場(chǎng)化的發(fā)展中是不可或缺的一部分,隨著我國(guó)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的不斷加速,提升我國(guó)第三方信用評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)的水平就成了當(dāng)務(wù)之急,對(duì)企業(yè)和債券進(jìn)行準(zhǔn)確的評(píng)級(jí)是評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)整個(gè)市場(chǎng)的責(zé)任。本文主要應(yīng)用案例分析和對(duì)比分析的方法,針對(duì)案例進(jìn)行分析,分析了第三方評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)被評(píng)級(jí)企業(yè)發(fā)行的債券進(jìn)行評(píng)級(jí)的問(wèn)題。本文緒論介紹研究背景和意義、研究思路和方法、文獻(xiàn)綜述、論文的創(chuàng)新與不足;第一章,介紹了評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)大公國(guó)際資信評(píng)估有限公司和被評(píng)級(jí)的債券——昆明滇池投資有限責(zé)任公司發(fā)行的“13滇投債/PR滇投債”的基本情況,以及介紹了大公資信對(duì)該債券信用評(píng)級(jí)的過(guò)程;第二章,通過(guò)穆迪公司評(píng)級(jí)方法對(duì)13滇投債券的評(píng)級(jí)應(yīng)用,對(duì)比分析了穆迪與大公資信評(píng)級(jí)方法,指出了大公資信基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施行業(yè)公司債券評(píng)級(jí)方法的優(yōu)勢(shì)與不足;第三章,對(duì)于基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施信用評(píng)級(jí)方法給出了發(fā)展建議。本文以大公資信對(duì)昆明滇池投資有限責(zé)任公司發(fā)行的“13滇投債/PR滇投債”評(píng)級(jí)為案例,描述了大公資信依據(jù)發(fā)布的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施行業(yè)公司債券評(píng)級(jí)方法對(duì)該債券進(jìn)行評(píng)級(jí)的過(guò)程,并通過(guò)與國(guó)際信用評(píng)級(jí)公司穆迪的評(píng)級(jí)方法比較,提出了對(duì)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施行業(yè)公司債券評(píng)級(jí)方法的進(jìn)一步改進(jìn)建議。力圖通過(guò)本文的案例分析和對(duì)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施行業(yè)公司債券評(píng)級(jí)方法的探索,為我國(guó)信用評(píng)級(jí)公司對(duì)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施行業(yè)公司債券的評(píng)級(jí)方法提供參考,為我國(guó)評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)建立針對(duì)性的行業(yè)評(píng)級(jí)方法提供借鑒意見(jiàn)。
[Abstract]:Credit rating is a method for investors and users of rating results to understand the credit status of investment instruments such as bonds. It is based on rating theory and guided by scientific rating methods to rate bonds issued by enterprises or enterprises. Then reveals the credit risk. Credit rating is an indispensable part in the development of marketization. With the continuous acceleration of the development of our market economy, it is imperative to upgrade the level of third-party credit rating agencies in our country. Accurate ratings of companies and bonds are the responsibility of rating agencies to the market as a whole. This paper mainly applies the method of case analysis and contrast analysis, and analyzes the problem of the third party rating agencies' rating of the bonds issued by the rated enterprises. The introduction of this paper introduces the research background and significance, research ideas and methods, literature review, innovation and shortcomings of the paper. This paper introduces the basic situation of Dagong International Credit Appraisal Co., Ltd and the rated bond issued by Kunming Dianchi Investment Co., Ltd. In chapter two, the credit rating methods of Moody's and Dagong are compared and analyzed through the application of Moody's rating method to 13Dian bonds. This paper points out the advantages and disadvantages of the bond rating method of Dagong credit infrastructure industry, and gives some suggestions for the development of the credit rating method for infrastructure in the third chapter. This paper describes the process of Dagong Credit rating of "13 Dian Investment Bond / PR Dian Investment Bond" issued by Kunming Dianchi Investment Co., Ltd., which is issued by Dagong Credit Corporation, and describes the process of Dagong Credit rating according to the bond rating method of infrastructure industry company issued by Dagong Credit. By comparing with the rating method of international credit rating company Moody's, the paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the method of corporate bond rating in infrastructure industry. Through the case analysis of this paper and the exploration of the corporate bond rating method of the infrastructure industry, this paper provides a reference for the credit rating company of our country to the corporate bond rating method of the infrastructure industry. It provides reference for China's rating agencies to establish targeted industry rating methods.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F832.51

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜葉倩;;指標(biāo)簡(jiǎn)化方法的探討——以信用評(píng)級(jí)為例[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2016年35期

2 李思維;;大數(shù)據(jù)分析方法在量化評(píng)級(jí)中的應(yīng)用探討[J];時(shí)代金融;2016年33期

3 牛萌;;中國(guó)債券資信評(píng)級(jí)市場(chǎng)的發(fā)展研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)界(學(xué)術(shù)版);2016年18期

4 吳國(guó)梁;;我國(guó)信用評(píng)級(jí)業(yè)存在的問(wèn)題及應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2016年33期

5 李丹;;信用評(píng)級(jí)規(guī)范發(fā)展的國(guó)際借鑒[J];征信;2016年08期

6 劉雨晨;;公司債的評(píng)級(jí)方法要引入社會(huì)責(zé)任因素[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2016年05期

7 李丹;;國(guó)際評(píng)級(jí)行業(yè)發(fā)展與監(jiān)管動(dòng)態(tài)[J];金融市場(chǎng)研究;2015年08期

8 卿固;辛超群;;信用評(píng)級(jí)方法模型的選擇策略研究[J];天津商務(wù)職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期

9 彭星;;我國(guó)債券評(píng)級(jí)市場(chǎng)發(fā)展研究[J];武漢金融;2015年06期

10 郭濂;;國(guó)際三大信用評(píng)級(jí)機(jī)構(gòu)的比較研究[J];中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2150211