本文關鍵詞：股權性質、非效率投資與企業(yè)價值影響研究　出處：《山東大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 股權性質 非效率投資 企業(yè)價值 國有企業(yè)

【摘要】：投資活動、籌資活動與股利分配活動并稱為現(xiàn)代公司理財活動的三大核心內容。其中,投資活動作為企業(yè)獲取未來現(xiàn)金流量增長和實現(xiàn)企業(yè)成長的主要動因,間接影響到其他兩大核心決策,通過評價投資決策的效率和效果,理財人員可以全面了解到企業(yè)現(xiàn)金流量的動向以及企業(yè)價值的創(chuàng)造。 現(xiàn)實世界中,企業(yè)普遍面臨不對稱信息帶來的“融資困境”及“債務懸橫”。同時,管理層出于增加報酬和證明自身的需要會不斷擴大企業(yè)規(guī)模,超出了企業(yè)的實際投資需要。加之職業(yè)經(jīng)理人本身就存在偷懶和謀取私利的動機,投資決策背后隱藏著深刻的道德風險,本文首先假設我國企業(yè)普遍存在非效率投資。在我國,國有企業(yè)兼具“雙重身份”—享受著來自政策扶持的同時,也承擔著政治干預下的“效率損失”。此外,國企領導人眾多的“政治關聯(lián)”及地方政府的過度干預也會對企業(yè)的投資決策產(chǎn)生不利影響,隨之假設國家股權性質與企業(yè)價值負向相關。根據(jù)Wooldridge(1988)的研究,當企業(yè)披露購買廠房設備、新產(chǎn)品引進或增加研發(fā)支出消息時,股票價格一般會上升。本文認為,企業(yè)投資消息是“利好”的反映,能夠引發(fā)眾多投資者們的“羊群行為”,構成正能量循環(huán)的開始。相反,投資不足的企業(yè)為走出困境發(fā)出的融資信號向外傳遞了負能量,導致投資者們“信心”下降,導致企業(yè)長期處于一種投資缺乏、融資困難、市場信心較低的狀態(tài),最終造成企業(yè)價值的下降。本文假設投資過度能夠促進企業(yè)價值的提升,投資不足則與企業(yè)價值呈負相關關系。國有企業(yè)因其雄厚的資金背景和政策關注支持,導致市場對其宣布的信號更有信心(林娜,2011)。在上述兩種情況下,企業(yè)的一切決策行為—包括投資決策,會更加迅速的體現(xiàn)在企業(yè)價值上,于是本文假設對于投資效率與企業(yè)價值的作用,在國有企業(yè)會表現(xiàn)地更加強烈。 在實證部分,本文借鑒La Porta(2002)對股權性質的“終極控制人”劃分標準,將我國的上市公司分為“國有”股權性質與“非國有”股權性質兩個大類,同時按照Richardson(2006)非效率投資的測量模型,依據(jù)“投資過度”與“投資不足”兩類對中國上市公司的非效率投資程度進行了反映。進一步,選取我國A股上市公司主板市場2007-2012年的數(shù)據(jù)加以整理篩選,以股權性質和非效率投資(投資過度與投資不足)作為解釋變量構建面板數(shù)據(jù)回歸模型,根據(jù)數(shù)據(jù)分析的結果對本文提出的假設進行解釋與驗證,最終得出本文的研究結論：我國上市公司普遍存在非效率投資行為,并且投資過度程度更加嚴重；相比非國有股權性質,國有股權性質與企業(yè)價值呈負相關關系；投資過度的非效率投資行為與企業(yè)價值呈正相關關系,其程度在國有股權性質企業(yè)可能強于非國有股權性質企業(yè)；投資不足的非效率投資行為與企業(yè)價值呈負相關關系,其作用程度在國有股權性質企業(yè)可能強于非國有股權性質企業(yè)。 最后,以本文理論分析結論和實證檢驗結果為依據(jù),提出諸如轉變政府職能、完善上市公司的投資決策機制、發(fā)揮外部監(jiān)督以及改進國有企業(yè)管理人員考核標準等建議,同時分析了本研究的不足以及進一步研究的方向,以期為我國當前國有企業(yè)改革和實現(xiàn)企業(yè)資產(chǎn)的保值增值提供更多可行的建議。
[Abstract]:Investment activities, financing activities and dividend distribution activities and known as the three core financial activities of modern companies. Among them, the investment activities as the main motivation for enterprises to obtain the growth of future cash flow and achieve business growth, and indirectly affect the other two core decision-making, through efficiency and effect evaluation of investment decision-making, financial personnel can fully understand to create the trend of enterprise cash flow and enterprise value.
In the real world, enterprises generally face asymmetric information brings the "financing difficulties" and "debt overhang horizontal". At the same time, the management for increasing returns and prove their needs will continue to expand the scale of enterprises, beyond the actual needs of enterprises and investment managers. Occupation itself is lazy and seek personal motivation behind the investment decision hidden moral risk deeply. Firstly, the assumption that the Chinese enterprises are generally inefficient investment. In our country, state-owned enterprises with "dual identity" - enjoy from policy support at the same time, also bear the political intervention of the "efficiency". In addition, many of the leaders of the state-owned enterprises' political connection and local government the excessive intervention may also adversely affect the investment decision of enterprises, with the assumption of the nature of equity and enterprise value of national negative correlation. According to Wooldridge (1988) study, When the enterprise to disclose the purchase of plant and equipment, the introduction of new products or increase R & D spending news, stock prices will generally rise. This paper argues that enterprise investment news is "good" to reflect, caused many investors "herd behavior", which is the beginning of the energy cycle. On the contrary, the lack of investment in the enterprise financing signal out of the predicament from the outward transfer of negative energy, resulting in a decline in investors "confidence", resulting in a lack of long-term investment, corporate financing difficulties, market confidence is low, eventually leading to a decline in the value of the enterprise. This paper assumes that excessive investment can promote the enterprise value, the lack of investment is negatively correlated with the enterprise the value of the state-owned enterprises. Because of its strong financial background and policy concern support, leading to the market on the announcement signal more confidence (Lin Na, 2011). In the above two cases, enterprises All decision making actions, including investment decisions, will be reflected more rapidly in the enterprise value. Therefore, this paper assumes that the role of investment efficiency and corporate value will be more intense in state-owned enterprises.
In the empirical part, this paper uses La Porta (2002) of the equity nature of the ultimate controller division standard, will be China's listed companies are divided into state-owned and non state-owned equity property ownership "two categories, according to Richardson (2006) model of measuring the efficiency of investment, on the basis of the" investment excessive "and" insufficient investment "two kinds of Chinese listed company inefficient investment is reflected. Further, select the A listed company in China the main market 2007-2012 data collected by screening, the nature of equity and non efficiency investment (over investment and under investment) as explanatory variables to construct a panel data regression model in this paper according to the analysis results of the hypothesis to explain and verify the final conclusion of this article: China's listed companies generally have non efficiency investment behavior, and the degree of over investment More serious; compared with non state-owned equity nature, there was a negative correlation between the nature and the state-owned equity value is positively related to enterprise value; non efficiency investment behavior and corporate over investment, the degree may be stronger than that of non state-owned enterprises in the ownership nature of state-owned shares of enterprises; there was a negative correlation between the non efficiency investment behavior and insufficient investment value and the degree of the effect may be stronger than the non state-owned enterprises in the ownership of state-owned equity nature of the enterprise.
Finally, the conclusion and the empirical results of this paper is based on the theory, put forward such as the transformation of government functions, improve the investment decision-making mechanism of listed companies, and improve the standard of play to the external supervision management assessment of state-owned enterprises, and analyzes the shortcomings of this research and the direction of further research, in order to provide more practical advice for me in the current reform of state-owned enterprises and enterprises to realize the value of the assets.

【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.51;F275

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 呂峻;;政府干預和治理結構對公司過度投資的影響[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2012年01期

2 郭麗虹;金德環(huán);;企業(yè)投資與企業(yè)的流動性——基于中國制造業(yè)的面板數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];財經(jīng)研究;2007年03期

3 徐曉東;張?zhí)煳?;公司治理、自由現(xiàn)金流與非效率投資[J];財經(jīng)研究;2009年10期

4 陳珩;貢文竹;;股權結構與公司績效的實證研究——基于滬市制造業(yè)上市公司的數(shù)據(jù)[J];財會通訊;2010年24期

5 吳銳;余波;;基于自由現(xiàn)金流的地方國有與民營企業(yè)過度投資對比研究[J];財會月刊;2009年03期

6 葛永波;周倬君;柳艷;;融資約束導致投資不足還是代理問題導致投資過度?——基于上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];東岳論叢;2012年03期

7 吳淑琨;股權結構與公司績效的U型關系研究——1997～2000年上市公司的實證研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2002年01期

8 徐向藝;張立達;;上市公司股權結構與公司價值關系研究——一個分組檢驗的結果[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2008年04期

9 肖作平;蘇忠秦;;現(xiàn)金股利是“掏空”的工具還是掩飾“掏空”的面具?——來自中國上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];管理工程學報;2012年02期

10 楊華軍;胡奕明;;制度環(huán)境與自由現(xiàn)金流的過度投資[J];管理世界;2007年09期

，

本文編號：1371942