【摘要】：幸福是人類(lèi)不懈努力的永恒追求,將幸福納入經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究,作為經(jīng)濟(jì)生活中重要的參考指標(biāo)、發(fā)展方向或約束因子,有其無(wú)可取代的意義。 然而,近年來(lái)規(guī)模浩大的城市化進(jìn)程并沒(méi)有加速居民幸福感的提升,也沒(méi)有對(duì)居民的滿意度和幸福感給予應(yīng)有的重視。有基于此,本文運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)研究法、定性分析法及實(shí)證分析法考察了幸福維度下的最優(yōu)城市規(guī)模,主要從以下幾個(gè)方面展開(kāi)： 首先,由于直接相關(guān)的文獻(xiàn)數(shù)量極其有限,本文擴(kuò)大范圍,對(duì)主觀幸福感以及最優(yōu)城市規(guī)模兩大主題的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)分別進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的整理和綜述。在文獻(xiàn)梳理的基礎(chǔ)上,本文界定了幸福感的含義及影響因素、城市規(guī)模的衡量及劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并探索性地加入中間影響因素,構(gòu)建了城市規(guī)模對(duì)居民幸福感的影響機(jī)制模型。 其次,采用問(wèn)卷調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)與統(tǒng)計(jì)年鑒數(shù)據(jù)匯總而成的2011年截面數(shù)據(jù),對(duì)130個(gè)樣本城市的居民幸福感與城市規(guī)模的關(guān)系、引入中間變量后兩者之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了定量研究。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)城市規(guī)模與居民幸福感兩者之間不存在直接的線性關(guān)系或倒U形關(guān)系,但是人均收入、政府財(cái)政支出、圖書(shū)擁有量、教育機(jī)會(huì)和交通狀況五個(gè)中間變量能夠幫助建立相應(yīng)路徑中城市規(guī)模與居民主觀幸福感兩者之間的倒U形關(guān)系,進(jìn)而計(jì)算得出幸福維度下的最優(yōu)城市規(guī)模。 最后,在對(duì)論文進(jìn)行歸納總結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上,反思我國(guó)城市化進(jìn)程。根據(jù)相應(yīng)的實(shí)證結(jié)果提出三條政策建議：以居民幸福最大化為原則,控制適度城市規(guī)模；以城市特點(diǎn)個(gè)性化為方向,尋求幸福提升契機(jī)；以資源利用集約化為底線,共建綠色幸福城市。同時(shí)還分析了本文的創(chuàng)新與不足之處,對(duì)具有研究?jī)r(jià)值且可行性高的未來(lái)研究方向作了說(shuō)明和展望。
[Abstract]:Happiness is the eternal pursuit of human unremitting efforts. It is of irreplaceable significance to bring happiness into the study of economics as an important reference index development direction or constraint factor in economic life. However, the large-scale urbanization in recent years has not accelerated the improvement of residents' well-being, nor has it paid due attention to the residents' satisfaction and well-being. Based on this, this paper uses literature research method, qualitative analysis method and empirical analysis method to investigate the optimal urban scale in the dimension of happiness, mainly from the following aspects: first, because of the extremely limited number of directly related documents, This paper expands the scope of subjective well-being and the optimal urban scale of the two major topics of the relevant literature are systematically collated and summarized. On the basis of literature review, this paper defines the meaning of well-being and its influencing factors, measures and classifies the standard of urban scale, and adds the intermediate influencing factors to construct the model of the influence mechanism of urban scale on residents' well-being. Secondly, using the data of questionnaire survey and statistical yearbook, the relationship between the well-being of 130 sample cities and the scale of the city is studied quantitatively. After introducing the intermediate variables, the relationship between the two is studied quantitatively. The results showed that there was no direct linear or inverted U-shape relationship between urban size and residents' well-being, but per capita income, government expenditure, book ownership, The five intermediate variables of educational opportunity and traffic condition can help to establish the inverted U-shape relationship between the urban scale and the subjective well-being of the residents in the corresponding path, and then calculate the optimal urban scale under the happiness dimension. Finally, on the basis of summing up the thesis, we reflect on the process of urbanization in China. According to the corresponding empirical results three policy recommendations are put forward: to maximize the well-being of the residents to control the moderate scale of the city to seek the opportunity to promote happiness in the direction of individualization of the characteristics of the city; In order to use resources intensive for the bottom line, build a green and happy city. At the same time, the innovation and deficiency of this paper are analyzed, and the future research direction with research value and high feasibility is explained and prospected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F299.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邢占軍;;幸福指數(shù)的指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建與追蹤研究[J];數(shù)據(jù);2006年08期

2 陳偉民,蔣華園;城市規(guī)模效益及其發(fā)展政策[J];財(cái)經(jīng)科學(xué);2000年04期

3 陳惠雄;吳麗民;;國(guó)民快樂(lè)指數(shù)調(diào)查量表設(shè)計(jì)的理論機(jī)理、結(jié)構(gòu)與測(cè)量學(xué)特性分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)論叢(浙江財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2006年05期

4 饒會(huì)林,叢屹;再談城市規(guī)模效益問(wèn)題[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;1999年10期

5 劉永亮;;置疑中國(guó)最優(yōu)城市規(guī)模[J];城市規(guī)劃;2011年05期

6 袁正;鄭勇;韓驍;;城市規(guī)模與居民幸福感的關(guān)系[J];城市問(wèn)題;2012年05期

7 許抄軍;;基于環(huán)境質(zhì)量的中國(guó)城市規(guī)模探討[J];地理研究;2009年03期

8 吉昱華,蔡躍洲,楊克泉;中國(guó)城市集聚效益實(shí)證分析[J];管理世界;2004年03期

9 金相郁;最佳城市規(guī)模理論與實(shí)證分析:以中國(guó)三大直轄市為例[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年07期

10 孫浦陽(yáng);武力超;;城市的最優(yōu)發(fā)展規(guī)模:基于宜居視角的研究[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：2425131