基于制度演化的我國PPP模式優(yōu)劣勢分析
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-22 15:08
【摘要】：改革開放以來,我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)持續(xù)快速發(fā)展,城鎮(zhèn)化規(guī)模日益增大,但基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的建設(shè)相對于經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的需要和人民對生活水平提高的需求明顯滯后,20世紀(jì)80年代PPP(Public-Private Partnership)模式的引入開啟了我國基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)新模式的浪潮,在一段時(shí)間內(nèi)看似解決了我國政府對于基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)的資金匱乏等問題,但由于當(dāng)時(shí)我國進(jìn)行相關(guān)項(xiàng)目運(yùn)作經(jīng)驗(yàn)的缺乏,各方面體制、機(jī)制尚不完善,且私人企業(yè)參與者缺乏項(xiàng)目穩(wěn)定性、在進(jìn)行PPP模式基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)或提供相關(guān)服務(wù)時(shí)采取的機(jī)會(huì)主義行為,以及政府部門官員在與私人部門合作時(shí)的玩忽職守等因素,導(dǎo)致我國大量PPP項(xiàng)目的運(yùn)營出現(xiàn)問題,政府部門與私人部門不得不重新談判。在此情況下,政府基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)資金短缺的問題非但沒有解決,反而在很大程度上增加了PPP項(xiàng)目的交易成本,使得該模式在我國的運(yùn)用遇到了困境。 近年來,隨著我國國有企業(yè)綜合實(shí)力的提升,大量基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)PPP項(xiàng)目被授予國有企業(yè)的趨勢非常明顯,形成基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)的PUP(Public-Public Partnership)模式。本文基于制度演化的視角,對促進(jìn)我國PPP向PUP模式演化的影響因素進(jìn)行分析和解釋。 首先,運(yùn)用交易成本理論等新制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論制度,分析我國基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)模式演化路徑依賴性；其次,對PPP模式的定義、發(fā)展、起源及我國PPP模式的引入背景和發(fā)展過程進(jìn)行論述,并對我國PPP模式演化過程中出現(xiàn)的BOT、PFI等不同項(xiàng)目模式進(jìn)行比較分析；之后,基于我國PPP項(xiàng)目案例,歸納總結(jié)我國PPP項(xiàng)目的失敗影響因素,通過AHP方法提煉關(guān)鍵影響因素,分析關(guān)鍵影響因素對我國PPP向PUP模式演化路徑的影響；最后,運(yùn)用SWOT方法分析今后我國應(yīng)用PUP模式進(jìn)行基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)的優(yōu)劣勢。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economy has continued to develop rapidly, and the scale of urbanization has been increasing day by day. However, the need of infrastructure construction in relation to economic development and the people's demand for the improvement of living standards lag behind obviously. The introduction of PPP (Public-Private Partnership) model in 1980s has opened a new wave of infrastructure construction in China. In a period of time, it seems to have solved the problem of our government's lack of funds for infrastructure construction. However, due to the lack of experience in the operation of relevant projects in our country at that time, all aspects of the system and mechanism are still not perfect. And private enterprise participants lack project stability, opportunistic behavior in PPP infrastructure construction or provision of related services, and negligence on the part of government officials in working with the private sector. As a result of the problems in the operation of a large number of PPP projects in China, government departments and the private sector have to renegotiate. In this case, the shortage of government capital for infrastructure construction has not been solved, but has increased the transaction cost of the PPP project to a large extent, which makes the application of the model in China meet with difficulties. In recent years, with the improvement of the comprehensive strength of state-owned enterprises in China, the trend that a large number of infrastructure PPP projects have been awarded to state-owned enterprises is very obvious, which forms the PUP (Public-Public Partnership) mode of infrastructure construction. Based on the perspective of institutional evolution, this paper analyzes and explains the factors influencing the evolution of PPP to PUP model in China. First of all, using the transaction cost theory and other new institutional economics theories and systems to analyze the evolution path dependence of the infrastructure construction mode in China; secondly, the definition and development of the PPP model. The origin, the introduction background and the development process of the PPP model in China are discussed, and the different project models such as BOTPVI which appear in the evolution process of the PPP model in China are compared and analyzed. Then, based on the case of PPP project in China, This paper summarizes the factors influencing the failure of PPP projects in China, extracts the key influencing factors through the AHP method, and analyzes the influence of the key influencing factors on the evolution path from PPP to PUP mode in China. SWOT method is used to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of using PUP mode in infrastructure construction in China in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F283
本文編號(hào)：2197477
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economy has continued to develop rapidly, and the scale of urbanization has been increasing day by day. However, the need of infrastructure construction in relation to economic development and the people's demand for the improvement of living standards lag behind obviously. The introduction of PPP (Public-Private Partnership) model in 1980s has opened a new wave of infrastructure construction in China. In a period of time, it seems to have solved the problem of our government's lack of funds for infrastructure construction. However, due to the lack of experience in the operation of relevant projects in our country at that time, all aspects of the system and mechanism are still not perfect. And private enterprise participants lack project stability, opportunistic behavior in PPP infrastructure construction or provision of related services, and negligence on the part of government officials in working with the private sector. As a result of the problems in the operation of a large number of PPP projects in China, government departments and the private sector have to renegotiate. In this case, the shortage of government capital for infrastructure construction has not been solved, but has increased the transaction cost of the PPP project to a large extent, which makes the application of the model in China meet with difficulties. In recent years, with the improvement of the comprehensive strength of state-owned enterprises in China, the trend that a large number of infrastructure PPP projects have been awarded to state-owned enterprises is very obvious, which forms the PUP (Public-Public Partnership) mode of infrastructure construction. Based on the perspective of institutional evolution, this paper analyzes and explains the factors influencing the evolution of PPP to PUP model in China. First of all, using the transaction cost theory and other new institutional economics theories and systems to analyze the evolution path dependence of the infrastructure construction mode in China; secondly, the definition and development of the PPP model. The origin, the introduction background and the development process of the PPP model in China are discussed, and the different project models such as BOTPVI which appear in the evolution process of the PPP model in China are compared and analyzed. Then, based on the case of PPP project in China, This paper summarizes the factors influencing the failure of PPP projects in China, extracts the key influencing factors through the AHP method, and analyzes the influence of the key influencing factors on the evolution path from PPP to PUP mode in China. SWOT method is used to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of using PUP mode in infrastructure construction in China in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F283
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 郭朝陽;趙耀;;膠東半島濱海旅游資源規(guī)劃與開發(fā)SWOT分析[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年10期
2 王灝;PPP的定義和分類研究[J];都市快軌交通;2004年05期
3 張萬寬;;公私伙伴關(guān)系的理論分析——基于合作博弈與交易成本的視角[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2008年05期
4 胡振;劉華;劉佳力;;英國PFI項(xiàng)目的政府管制體系研究[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年10期
5 王薇;戴大雙;王東波;;廣西來賓B電廠BOT項(xiàng)目特許經(jīng)營者選擇研究[J];科技與管理;2011年02期
6 周學(xué)榮;;英國公共服務(wù)改革及其啟示[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期
7 喬立新;;建筑工程招投標(biāo)中的信息不對稱影響[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期
8 李潘武;宋勝男;陳幸斌;管宇;;基于SWOT分析法的BOT項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理應(yīng)用研究[J];價(jià)值工程;2012年32期
9 王亞軍;;河北淶源礦山地質(zhì)環(huán)境影響程度綜合評價(jià)[J];礦產(chǎn)勘查;2010年06期
10 亓霞;柯永建;王守清;;基于案例的中國PPP項(xiàng)目的主要風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素分析[J];中國軟科學(xué);2009年05期
，本文編號(hào)：2197477
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jingjiguanlilunwen/2197477.html
最近更新
教材專著
