本文關(guān)鍵詞： 選址 指標(biāo)體系 權(quán)重 評判 分撥中心　出處：《中國科學(xué)院大學(xué)（工程管理與信息技術(shù)學(xué)院）》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：S公司是一家主要經(jīng)營國際、國內(nèi)速遞及報(bào)關(guān)、報(bào)檢等業(yè)務(wù)的快遞企業(yè),主要依靠航空方式運(yùn)輸快遞包裹,其自有航空公司也于2009年12月正式開航。2011年,S公司因整體業(yè)務(wù)發(fā)展需要,決定于華東地區(qū)選址新建分撥中心,主要承擔(dān)華東與其他大區(qū)之間的快件分撥中轉(zhuǎn),需在9個(gè)備選場址中選擇最優(yōu)場址。 本文中,作者完成的工作主要如下： (1)數(shù)學(xué)方法應(yīng)用前的基礎(chǔ)工作 經(jīng)需求分析,通過備選場址參數(shù)的收集,為數(shù)學(xué)方法的應(yīng)用提供必須的輸入信息。同時(shí),為避免冗余計(jì)算量,對備選場址進(jìn)行定量篩選,對明顯不符合要求的備選場址予以剔除。 (2)分析得出評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系遞階結(jié)構(gòu) 分析分撥中心選址需考慮的因素,確保因素選擇的約束性,將這些因素轉(zhuǎn)化為評價(jià)指標(biāo),從而建立評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系遞階結(jié)構(gòu),并明確該指標(biāo)體系的適用范圍。 (3)確定分撥中心選址模型的指標(biāo)權(quán)重 通過發(fā)放問卷、綜合專家的意見,通過層次分析法演算最終確定各指標(biāo)的權(quán)重,形成完整的分撥中心選址評級指標(biāo)體系。 (4)最佳場址的評判確定 運(yùn)用模糊綜合評判法,對備選方案進(jìn)行綜合評判。評判過程中,定性指標(biāo)部分由有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的專家打分確定,定量指標(biāo)通過無量綱化處理以及隸屬度判斷加以轉(zhuǎn)化,以便統(tǒng)一評判,由此計(jì)算出各場址基于評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的得分,確定最佳場址。 通過對S公司華東分撥中心選址項(xiàng)目加以研究,應(yīng)用層次分析、模糊綜合評判等方法,實(shí)踐性地總結(jié)了快遞行業(yè)場站選址目前存在的共性問題,對國內(nèi)快遞行業(yè)科學(xué)決策有著相應(yīng)的啟發(fā)性,對快遞業(yè)提升科學(xué)應(yīng)用水平、實(shí)施精細(xì)化經(jīng)營是有益的。同時(shí),分撥中心選址評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的得出,也為S公司提供了選址決策的范式工具,對提升S公司選址決策的科學(xué)性、進(jìn)而提升經(jīng)營管理水平都是有利的。
[Abstract]:S company is a major international, domestic express delivery and customs declaration, inspection and other business express enterprises, mainly rely on air transport express packages. Its own airline also officially set sail on December 2009. In 2011, due to the needs of the overall business development, the company decided to choose a new distribution center in East China. It mainly undertakes the transfer of express service between East China and other regions, and it needs to select the optimal site among 9 alternative sites. In this paper, the main work accomplished by the author is as follows: 1) basic work before the application of mathematical methods Through the requirement analysis, the necessary input information is provided for the application of mathematical method through the collection of the parameters of the alternative site. At the same time, in order to avoid the redundant computation, the quantitative screening of the alternative site is carried out. The removal of candidate sites that are manifestly incompatible with the requirements. The hierarchical structure of evaluation index system is obtained by analysis. This paper analyzes the factors that need to be considered in the location of distribution center, ensures the constraint of factor selection, converts these factors into evaluation indexes, and establishes the hierarchical structure of the evaluation index system, and clarifies the scope of application of the index system. 3) determining the index weight of distribution center location model By issuing questionnaires and synthesizing the opinions of experts, the weight of each index is determined through the calculation of analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and a complete index system of distribution center location and rating is formed. 4) determination of the best site The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the alternatives. In the process of evaluation, the qualitative index is determined by the experienced experts. The quantitative index is transformed by dimensionless treatment and membership judgment in order to unify the evaluation. The score of each site based on the evaluation index system is calculated and the best site is determined. Through the research on the location of East China Divisional Center of S Company, applying the methods of AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, this paper summarizes the common problems existing in the site selection of express delivery industry. It has the corresponding enlightenment to the domestic express industry science decision, promotes the science application level to the express delivery industry, implements the fine management is beneficial. At the same time, distributes the center location appraisal index system to obtain. It also provides S company with a paradigm tool for location decision, which is beneficial to enhance the scientific nature of S company location decision and further enhance the level of management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國科學(xué)院大學(xué)（工程管理與信息技術(shù)學(xué)院）
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F259.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐杰,鄭凱,田源,汝宜紅;物流中心選址的影響因素分析及案例[J];北方交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年05期

2 關(guān)志民,周宏波,馬欽海;基于模糊多指標(biāo)評價(jià)方法的配送中心選址優(yōu)化決策[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年08期

3 顧美芳;新港選址的定量分析[J];大連海運(yùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1987年04期

4 胡兆光;模糊決策在電廠選址中的應(yīng)用[J];電網(wǎng)技術(shù);1985年02期

5 任永昌;邢濤;趙國強(qiáng);;物流配送中心選址方案模糊決策分析[J];遼寧工程技術(shù)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年03期

6 劉豹,許樹柏,趙煥臣,和金生;層次分析法—規(guī)劃決策的工具[J];系統(tǒng)工程;1984年02期

7 高更君,王震宇,黃衛(wèi);基于多目標(biāo)模糊決策的公共物流中心選址研究[J];公路交通科技;2004年09期

8 朱來輝;曹煒;張玨;;基于FAHP的民用機(jī)場選址方案優(yōu)選[J];四川兵工學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

9 呂蓬，，邢棉，康怡;火電廠選址最優(yōu)規(guī)劃中的層次分析法[J];華北電力學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1994年04期

10 榮海濤;;煤炭物流中心選址決策研究[J];江蘇科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

本文編號：1481224