本文關(guān)鍵詞：日本城市化模式研究　出處：《吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 城市化模式城市化率 日本經(jīng)濟(jì) 工業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)化

【摘要】：一個(gè)國(guó)家的城市化發(fā)展水平，在某種程度上是衡量其經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展水平的一個(gè)重要指標(biāo)，即經(jīng)濟(jì)越發(fā)達(dá)，其城市化率相對(duì)越高，反之亦然。 日本是二戰(zhàn)后首個(gè)實(shí)現(xiàn)工業(yè)化的亞洲國(guó)家，其獨(dú)特的城市化模式以及城市化的建設(shè)經(jīng)驗(yàn)受到國(guó)際社會(huì)的廣泛關(guān)注。歐美等發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家初步完成城市化的進(jìn)程用了100多年，但是，對(duì)于戰(zhàn)后的日本，其僅用了30年左右的時(shí)間，城市化率就從1950年的37%上升到1976年的76%。截至2011年，日本的城市化率達(dá)到了91.3%，這一數(shù)字已經(jīng)遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超出了東亞地區(qū)的55.6%的平均水平。 對(duì)于日本城市化模式的研究，一方面是由于其模式發(fā)展效果顯著，，另一方面是由于中國(guó)當(dāng)前推進(jìn)新型城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)，需要借鑒他國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)。中日兩國(guó)同處東亞并具有同質(zhì)性，比如：兩國(guó)都人多地少，保留了大量的農(nóng)耕人口，傳統(tǒng)文化類似，政府在發(fā)展過(guò)程中發(fā)揮了極大的作用等等。因此，借鑒日本的城市化發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)?zāi)軌蚋玫膽?yīng)對(duì)我國(guó)城鎮(zhèn)化過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的各種問題，而且日本在發(fā)展過(guò)程中曾出現(xiàn)的種種弊端可以給我們提供很好的警示作用，我們可以有效地進(jìn)行預(yù)防和規(guī)避，然后選擇更趨合理的發(fā)展路徑。綜上所述，對(duì)于日本城市化模式的研究，對(duì)我國(guó)新型城鎮(zhèn)化道路的選擇與建設(shè)有重要的理論意義及現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于： 在借鑒相關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上試圖從以下方面解決問題。一、研究的方法，側(cè)重于從微觀層面進(jìn)行相關(guān)的實(shí)證分析，提出基本發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略，包含基本策略和外圍策略。二、研究的出發(fā)點(diǎn)，充分考慮“三化同步”問題的作用機(jī)制及其對(duì)不同的城鎮(zhèn)化道路的制約因素，通過(guò)對(duì)土地制度和戶籍制度的改革試圖從根源上解決“三農(nóng)”問題，即要注重全體居民福利的改進(jìn)，而不是片面的強(qiáng)調(diào)經(jīng)濟(jì)的單純?cè)鲩L(zhǎng)。城鎮(zhèn)化和工業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)化的兩者發(fā)展是否有內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián)，以及如何實(shí)現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。三、研究的目的，通過(guò)對(duì)日本城市化模式的研究，探索適合我國(guó)新型城鎮(zhèn)化道路的可行性路徑模式，提供理論上的支撐，而不是僅停留在對(duì)城市化道路和模式的描述性分析上，摒棄以往單純對(duì)城市規(guī)模的爭(zhēng)論，著力探索具有區(qū)域特色的新型城鎮(zhèn)化模式。
[Abstract]:To some extent, the level of urbanization of a country is an important index to measure its economic and social development level, that is, the more developed the economy is, the higher its urbanization rate is, and vice versa.
Japan is the World War II first industrialized countries in Asia, its unique mode of city and city construction experience widely concerned by the international community. Europe and other developed countries initially completed the process of city for more than 100 years, but in postwar Japan, it took only 30 years time, the city of the rate rose from 37% in 1950 to 76%. in 1976 as of 2011, the Japanese city rate reached 91.3%, this figure has exceeded the average level of 55.6% in East Asia.
For the study of the Japanese city model, on the one hand is because of its mode of development has significant effect, on the other hand is due to the current China promote the construction of new urbanization, need to learn from the experience of other countries. China and Japan are located in East Asia and have homogeneity, such as: the two countries are more people and less land, retained a large farming population, traditional culture similarly, the government has played a significant role in the development process and so on. Therefore, all sorts of problems according to the Japanese experience of city development can better deal with China's urbanization process, and the drawbacks of Japan in the development process has emerged can provide a very good warning to us, we can effectively carry out prevention and avoidance, and then select the development path is more reasonable. In summary, for the study of the Japanese city mode, on China's new urbanization path selection and construction is important Theoretical significance and practical significance.
The innovation of this article lies in:
On the basis of relevant experience in the attempt to solve the problem from the following aspects. First, the research method, the empirical analysis on the correlation from the micro level, put forward the basic development strategy, including the basic strategy and external strategy. Two, the starting point of the research, considering the "three synchronous mechanism factors" and its constraints on the road of urbanization is different, through the reform of the land system and the household registration system to solve the "three rural issues" from the root, which should pay attention to the improvement of people's welfare, rather than one-sided emphasis on economic Dan Chunzeng. Both the development of Urbanization and industrial industrialization are interrelated, and how to achieve sustainable development. Three, the purpose of the research, through the research on the Japanese city mode, explore the feasibility of path model for China's new urbanization road, to provide theoretical support, but not It only stays on the descriptive analysis of the road and mode of urbanization, abandons the previous argument on the scale of the city, and explores the new urbanization mode with regional characteristics.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F299.313

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 呂斌;;日本經(jīng)濟(jì)高度增長(zhǎng)與快速城市化階段的城市規(guī)劃制度及其實(shí)踐——剖析昭和時(shí)期(1925—1989年)城市規(guī)劃制度的變革歷程[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2008年02期

2 崔萬(wàn)有;;論日本產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的變化特點(diǎn)及其經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];沈陽(yáng)工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

3 冀純堂;論日本政府的經(jīng)濟(jì)職能[J];日本學(xué)刊;1998年02期

4 顧楊妹;;二戰(zhàn)后日本人口城市化及城市問題研究[J];西北人口;2006年05期

5 李嚴(yán),李波;對(duì)日本經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式的思考[J];中南工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年03期

本文編號(hào)：1398082