發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-05 20:43

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì) 超額高管薪酬 股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)　出處：《浙江財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：一直以來(lái),高管薪酬被認(rèn)為是解決股東與管理層這一傳統(tǒng)委托代理問(wèn)題的關(guān)鍵,也是公司治理的重要機(jī)制之一。作為主流激勵(lì)理論之一,有效契約理論認(rèn)為激勵(lì)契約的設(shè)計(jì)和執(zhí)行有利于防范代理人的道德風(fēng)險(xiǎn),協(xié)調(diào)股東與管理層之間的代理沖突;與之相反,管理層權(quán)力理論卻認(rèn)為,由于資本市場(chǎng)、經(jīng)理人市場(chǎng)及公司治理機(jī)制在運(yùn)作過(guò)程中存在固有缺陷,高管薪酬往往淪為管理者權(quán)力下的自利產(chǎn)物,其本身便是委托代理成本的一部分。近年來(lái)上市公司“天價(jià)薪酬”的出現(xiàn)及高管薪酬的“掛倒車”現(xiàn)象也引發(fā)社會(huì)公眾的質(zhì)疑與討論。高管高薪究竟是“效率論”下的有效激勵(lì)還是“權(quán)力論”下的自利產(chǎn)物,一直以來(lái)是學(xué)術(shù)界與實(shí)務(wù)界爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn)。2008年全球金融危機(jī)后,股價(jià)暴跌或崩盤對(duì)資本市場(chǎng)的強(qiáng)烈沖擊引發(fā)了人們對(duì)于股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的思考,股價(jià)崩盤影響資本市場(chǎng)的健康發(fā)展,而個(gè)股層面的股價(jià)崩盤也關(guān)系到投資者們的切身利益。本文將超額高管薪酬納入微觀層面股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)影響因素的研究范圍,將兩者相結(jié)合,突破從收益框架討論高管薪酬有效性的研究現(xiàn)狀,基于信息不對(duì)稱理論下的非對(duì)稱風(fēng)險(xiǎn)框架,切入股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)視角,對(duì)高管超額薪酬是符合“效率論”還是“權(quán)力論”進(jìn)行實(shí)證檢驗(yàn),從而深入分析超額高管薪酬的激勵(lì)有效性和基于薪酬動(dòng)機(jī)的股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)成因。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文考慮產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)的影響,對(duì)不同產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)下的超額高管薪酬與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)相關(guān)關(guān)系進(jìn)行比較分析。本文研究包括六個(gè)部分:第一部分為緒論,闡述了本文的研究背景和研究意義、研究?jī)?nèi)容和研究方法,及本文的研究框架與可能的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。第二部分為文獻(xiàn)綜述,分別對(duì)超額高管薪酬和股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行了歸納和梳理,描述了國(guó)內(nèi)外現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)在超額高管薪酬的有效性和股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的形成、影響因素與經(jīng)濟(jì)后果等方面的研究成果,并進(jìn)行了文獻(xiàn)述評(píng)。第三部分為相關(guān)概念和理論分析,首先對(duì)本文所涉及到的超額高管薪酬和股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的概念進(jìn)行闡述,然后通過(guò)有效契約理論和管理者權(quán)力理論分析高管薪酬的激勵(lì)有效性,從信息不對(duì)稱理論和有效市場(chǎng)理論剖析股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的形成機(jī)理,為下文研究奠定理論基礎(chǔ)。第四部分為研究假設(shè)和研究設(shè)計(jì),根據(jù)第三部分的理論分析進(jìn)行了假設(shè)推演,提出研究假設(shè),介紹本文的被解釋變量、解釋變量與控制變量,以及構(gòu)建本文的研究模型,并以2010—2015年為研究窗口,以深滬A股上市公司為研究樣本進(jìn)行后續(xù)實(shí)證分析。第五部分為實(shí)證檢驗(yàn),主要運(yùn)用stata軟件進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究,在描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)與相關(guān)性分析的基礎(chǔ)上,利用研究模型對(duì)全樣本和分組樣本分別進(jìn)行回歸分析,實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)不同產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)下的超額高管薪酬對(duì)股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的影響,為使本文的研究結(jié)論更為穩(wěn)健,本文重新定義超額高管薪酬,替代原先變量進(jìn)行穩(wěn)健性檢驗(yàn)。第六部分為研究結(jié)論和政策建議,根據(jù)實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)的結(jié)果得出本文的研究結(jié)論,提出相關(guān)政策建議,并指出本文研究存在的局限性和未來(lái)研究展望。本文的研究結(jié)論為:(1)全樣本企業(yè)的超額高管薪酬與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系,但四組結(jié)果僅一組顯著,并不穩(wěn)健,原因是不同產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)的企業(yè)所適用的理論框架存在不同的表現(xiàn)形態(tài),導(dǎo)致區(qū)分了國(guó)有企業(yè)和民營(yíng)企業(yè)后,超額高管薪酬對(duì)股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的影響方向相反而影響全樣本的顯著性,因此對(duì)于超額高管薪酬與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的研究必須考慮產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)的影響。(2)國(guó)有企業(yè)的超額高管薪酬與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)顯著正相關(guān),在進(jìn)一步區(qū)分了中央國(guó)企與地方國(guó)企后發(fā)現(xiàn),超額高管薪酬與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的顯著正相關(guān)關(guān)系在地方國(guó)企中更為明顯,地方國(guó)企的超額高管薪酬支持管理者權(quán)力理論。(3)民營(yíng)企業(yè)的超額高管薪酬與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)呈穩(wěn)定的負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系,與在國(guó)有企業(yè)中的影響方向相反,但顯著性不強(qiáng),相較于國(guó)有企業(yè),民營(yíng)企業(yè)的高管高薪更具激勵(lì)性,更能反映高管的能力和股東對(duì)高管的期望,但激勵(lì)效果十分有限。(4)超額高管薪酬的崩盤效應(yīng)在國(guó)有企業(yè)與民營(yíng)企業(yè)樣本中呈現(xiàn)顯著差異,在中央國(guó)企與地方國(guó)企樣本中也存在顯著區(qū)別,體現(xiàn)了超額高管薪酬與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的相關(guān)關(guān)系受產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)的顯著影響。本文為不同產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)上市公司的高管薪酬機(jī)制建設(shè)提供了理論依據(jù),并同時(shí)反映了基于激勵(lì)動(dòng)機(jī)的股價(jià)崩盤效應(yīng),對(duì)完善上市公司高管激勵(lì)契約、降低個(gè)股層面股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、保護(hù)投資者利益等方面具有積極意義。
[Abstract]:Since the executive compensation is regarded as the key to solving the shareholders and the management of the traditional principal-agent problem, is one of the important mechanisms of corporate governance. As one of the mainstream of the incentive theory, the contract theory holds that effective incentive contract design and implementation is conducive to the moral risk prevention agent, agency conflicts between shareholders and management coordination; in contrast, managerial power theory is that, because of the capital market, manager market and corporate governance mechanism has inherent defects in the process of operation, self products often become executive compensation management under the authority, which itself is a part of agency cost. In recent years, the listed company "salary" appeared and the executive compensation "hanging car" phenomenon also led to public questioning and discussion. The well paid executives what is "effective incentive efficiency theory" or "power The product of self-interest ", has always been the focus of the.2008 academic and practical circles in the global financial crisis, the stock price plummeted or collapse of a strong impact on the capital market fears on stock crash risk, price collapse affect the healthy development of capital markets, and the stock price collapse also level to the interests of investors. The excess executive compensation into the scope of the study of micro level factors influence stock price crash risk, combines breakthrough discussed the status of executive compensation effectiveness from the revenue framework, asymmetric risk framework based on the theory of information asymmetry, the starting price collapse risk perspective on executive compensation is over in accordance with the" efficiency theory "or" power "theory of empirical testing, and further analysis of excess executive compensation incentive effectiveness and salary motivation based on shares The price collapse risk causes. On this basis, this paper consider the impact of property rights, to make a comparative analysis of the relationship between excess executive compensation and stock price collapse risk in different nature of property right. This paper includes six parts: the first part is the introduction, introduces the research background and research significance, research contents and research methods, research in this paper, and the framework and possible innovations. The second part is literature review, summarized and analyzed respectively the literatures related to excess executive compensation and stock crash risk, describes the formation of the existing literature at home and abroad in excess of executive compensation and the effectiveness of the stock crash risk, research the influential factors and economic consequences etc., and a literature review. The third part is the related concepts and theoretical analysis, the first of this paper refers to excessive executive compensation and stock crash risk probability Read the paper, and then through the analysis of the effectiveness of executive compensation incentive contract theory and the theory of effective power management, analyzes the formation mechanism of stock price crash risk from information asymmetry theory and efficient market theory, the theoretical basis for the following research. The fourth part is the research hypothesis and research design, according to the third part of the theoretical analysis of hypothesis deduction and put forward the research hypothesis, the explanatory variables, explanatory variables and control variables, and build the model of this research, and from 2010 to 2015 as the research window, with the Shanghai and Shenzhen A shares listed companies as research samples for subsequent empirical analysis. The fifth part is the empirical test, the main use of Stata software in the empirical research. Based on the descriptive statistics and correlation analysis, the whole sample and grouping samples respectively by regression analysis model, an empirical test of different products Effect of the nature of the right to excess executive compensation for stock crash risk, in order to make the conclusion of this paper is more robust, this paper redefines the excess executive compensation, to replace the original variables for the robustness test. The sixth part is the conclusions and policy recommendations, according to the results of empirical conclusions, and puts forward relevant policy suggestions. This paper points out the limitations and future research prospects. The conclusions of the paper are: (1) the relationship between excess executive compensation and stock price collapse risk positively full sample of enterprises, but the results of the four groups only one group, is not robust, because there are different forms of the theoretical framework of the companies of different property rights applicable the resulting distinction between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, the excess executive compensation effect on stock crash risk in the opposite direction and significant influence on the whole sample. Study on excess executive compensation and stock crash risk must be considered property rights. (2) is significantly related to excessive executive compensation and stock crash risk of state-owned enterprises, found in the further distinguish between the central SOEs and local state-owned enterprises, excessive executive compensation and stock price collapse risk of the significant positive correlation in the local state-owned enterprises more obviously, the local state-owned enterprises excessive executive compensation support managerial power theory. (3) private enterprises over executive pay and stock crash risk is negatively related to the stable, contrary effect in state-owned enterprises in the direction, but the significance is not strong, compared to the state-owned enterprises, private enterprises paid executives more incentive, better reflect the executive ability and shareholder expectations of executives, but the incentive effect is very limited. (4) the collapse effect of excess executive compensation in state owned enterprises and private enterprises in the sample Significant differences in the central state-owned enterprises and local state-owned enterprises in the sample have significant difference, significant effect reflects the correlation between executive compensation and excess stock crash risk by property rights. This paper provides a theoretical basis for the construction of executive compensation mechanism of listed company's property rights, and also reflects the effect of incentive based on stock crash. To improve the listed company executives incentive contract, reduce the level of stocks price collapse risk, is of positive significance to protect the interests of investors and so on.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F272.92;F832.51

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳克平;黎來(lái)芳;;審計(jì)師聲譽(yù)影響股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)嗎——基于中國(guó)資本市場(chǎng)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年09期

2 曹豐;魯冰;李爭(zhēng)光;徐凱;;股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)文獻(xiàn)述評(píng)與未來(lái)研究展望[J];財(cái)務(wù)研究;2016年02期

3 周冬華;賴升東;;上市公司現(xiàn)金流操控行為會(huì)加劇股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)嗎[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

4 錢文琪;;股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];會(huì)計(jì)師;2016年04期

5 董紅曄;;財(cái)務(wù)背景獨(dú)立董事的地理鄰近性與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

6 楊棉之;謝婷婷;孫曉莉;;股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與公司資本成本——基于中國(guó)A股上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];現(xiàn)代財(cái)經(jīng)(天津財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2015年12期

7 萬(wàn)東燦;;審計(jì)收費(fèi)與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];審計(jì)研究;2015年06期

8 權(quán)小鋒;吳世農(nóng);尹洪英;;企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn):“價(jià)值利器”或“自利工具”?[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年11期

9 曹豐;魯冰;李爭(zhēng)光;徐凱;;機(jī)構(gòu)投資者降低了股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)嗎?[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2015年11期

10 熊家財(cái);;審計(jì)行業(yè)專長(zhǎng)與股價(jià)崩盤風(fēng)險(xiǎn)——基于信息不對(duì)稱與異質(zhì)信念視角的檢驗(yàn)[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1492731