【摘要】：隨著科技與時(shí)代的發(fā)展,預(yù)應(yīng)力技術(shù)越來越多的被應(yīng)用到鋼結(jié)構(gòu)當(dāng)中。鋼框架-預(yù)應(yīng)力索支撐結(jié)構(gòu)正是預(yù)應(yīng)力技術(shù)的創(chuàng)新成果之一。該結(jié)構(gòu)的抗側(cè)能力由鋼框架和預(yù)應(yīng)力索支撐共同提供,形成了雙重抗側(cè)體系。但是,預(yù)應(yīng)力的存在使拉索內(nèi)蘊(yùn)大量應(yīng)變能。一旦拉索因某些偶然因素而斷裂,這些應(yīng)變能將隨之釋放,繼而對剩余結(jié)構(gòu)造成卸載沖擊并引發(fā)其動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)。為研究鋼框架-預(yù)應(yīng)力索支撐結(jié)構(gòu)中拉索斷裂對剩余結(jié)構(gòu)造成的動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng),并分析不同參數(shù)(索力、索徑等)對剩余結(jié)構(gòu)動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)劇烈程度的影響,本文將對三種典型鋼框架-預(yù)應(yīng)力索支撐結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行斷索分析。分析通過SAP2000有限元軟件的動(dòng)力分析模塊實(shí)現(xiàn),其中,拉索斷裂過程采用非線性去除構(gòu)件法模擬。分析采用的模型為單層鋼框架-預(yù)應(yīng)力索支撐結(jié)構(gòu)、多層鋼框架-預(yù)應(yīng)力索支撐結(jié)構(gòu)、巨型鋼框架-預(yù)應(yīng)力索支撐結(jié)構(gòu)。得到結(jié)論如下:(1)對單層鋼框架-預(yù)應(yīng)力索支撐結(jié)構(gòu),分析采用的斷索時(shí)間應(yīng)小于0.1T1(T1為剩余結(jié)構(gòu)自振周期)。最佳拉索破斷函數(shù)為線性階躍函數(shù)。阻尼越大,剩余結(jié)構(gòu)動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)越小。拉索預(yù)應(yīng)力越大,剩余結(jié)構(gòu)動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)越劇烈。一般情況下剩余結(jié)構(gòu)動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)隨拉索索徑增加而減弱,但是當(dāng)剩余結(jié)構(gòu)橫向豎向振型發(fā)生耦合時(shí),動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)顯著加強(qiáng)。(2)對多層鋼框架-預(yù)應(yīng)力索支撐結(jié)構(gòu),拉索預(yù)應(yīng)力越大,剩余結(jié)構(gòu)動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)越劇烈。隨拉索索徑增加,剩余結(jié)構(gòu)不同部位動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)變化趨勢不同。隨跨度增加,剩余結(jié)構(gòu)不同部位動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)變化趨勢也不同。(3)對巨型鋼框架-預(yù)應(yīng)力索支撐結(jié)構(gòu),隨拉索預(yù)應(yīng)力增加,剩余結(jié)構(gòu)不同部位動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)變化趨勢不同。隨拉索索徑增加,剩余結(jié)構(gòu)不同部位動(dòng)態(tài)響應(yīng)變化趨勢也不同。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, prestressed technology is applied to steel structure more and more. Steel frame-prestressed cable-braced structure is one of the innovative achievements of prestressed technology. The anti-lateral capacity of the structure is provided by steel frame and prestressed cable bracing together, forming a double anti-lateral system. However, the existence of prestress makes the cable contain a large amount of strain energy. Once the cable breaks due to some accidental factors, these strain energies will be released, which will cause unloading impact on the remaining structure and trigger its dynamic response. In order to study the dynamic response of the cable fracture to the residual structure in the steel frame-prestressed cable braced structure, and to analyze the influence of different parameters (cable force, cable diameter, etc.) on the dynamic response intensity of the residual structure. In this paper, three typical steel frame-prestressed cable-braced structures are analyzed. The analysis is realized by the dynamic analysis module of SAP2000 finite element software, in which the nonlinear removal method is used to simulate the fracture process of the cable. The models used are single-layer steel frame-prestressed cable support structure, multi-story steel frame-prestressed cable support structure, giant steel frame-prestressed cable bracing structure. The conclusions are as follows: (1) for single-layer steel frame-prestressed cable braced structure, the time of cable breaking should be less than 0.1T1 (T1 is the residual natural vibration period). The optimal cable breaking function is linear step function. The larger the damping is, the smaller the dynamic response of the remaining structure is. The larger the cable prestress, the more dynamic response of the remaining structure. In general, the dynamic response of the residual structure decreases with the increase of cable diameter, but the dynamic response is significantly strengthened when the transverse vertical mode of the residual structure is coupled. (2) for the multi-story steel frame-prestressed cable braced structure, The larger the cable prestress, the more dynamic response of the remaining structure. With the increase of cable diameter, the dynamic response of different parts of the residual structure varies. With the increase of span, the dynamic response of different parts of the residual structure is different. (3) for the giant steel frame-prestressed cable braced structure, the dynamic response of different parts of the residual structure is different with the increase of cable prestress. With the increase of cable diameter, the dynamic response of different parts of the residual structure is different.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：TU394

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王飛;唐柏鑒;朱佳鋒;;考慮索突然失效的張弦梁結(jié)構(gòu)防連續(xù)倒塌設(shè)計(jì)方法[J];四川建筑科學(xué)研究;2015年01期

2 吳啟明;;吊桿拱橋斷索沖擊效應(yīng)的簡化靜力計(jì)算方法研究[J];中國水運(yùn)(下半月);2014年04期

3 馬波;朱佳鋒;王飛;;巨型鋼框架—索支撐結(jié)構(gòu)中索突然失效的響應(yīng)[J];山西建筑;2014年07期

4 葉毅;張哲;李文武;郭琦;;自錨式吊拉協(xié)作體系橋端吊索破斷效應(yīng)[J];沈陽建筑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2013年03期

5 王飛;唐柏鑒;;單層平面鋼框架預(yù)應(yīng)力索突然失效的動(dòng)力效應(yīng)分析[J];鋼結(jié)構(gòu);2013年04期

6 沈超明;陳碩;杭振園;唐柏鑒;;拉索直徑對預(yù)應(yīng)力巨型支撐-鋼框架結(jié)構(gòu)抗側(cè)性能的影響[J];工程抗震與加固改造;2013年01期

7 唐柏鑒;顧盛;劉和平;;巨型鋼框架復(fù)合支撐體系拉索直徑確定方法[J];土木建筑與環(huán)境工程;2012年06期

8 朱明亮;董石麟;;基于向量式有限元的弦支穹頂失效分析[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(工學(xué)版);2012年09期

9 喻瑩;許賢;羅堯治;;基于有限質(zhì)點(diǎn)法的結(jié)構(gòu)動(dòng)力非線性行為分析[J];工程力學(xué);2012年06期

10 邵建華;唐柏鑒;;巨型鋼框架—預(yù)應(yīng)力復(fù)合支撐體系在水平荷載作用下的破壞性能[J];建筑科學(xué);2012年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 曹培;鋼筋混凝土框架結(jié)構(gòu)抗連續(xù)性倒塌性能研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2300749