【摘要】：自建筑學和土木工程學出現(xiàn)專業(yè)分工以來,建筑工程設計通常表現(xiàn)出一種先建筑后結構的線性思維和單向流程特征。由于結構知識匱乏造成的誤解與偏見成為了建筑形態(tài)塑造的約束與限制,同時,勉強服從于缺乏客觀結構規(guī)則基本判斷的建筑設計目標,會造成結構資源的巨大浪費,然而,建筑與結構并非沒有互動的愿望,只是缺少一套可供交流的共同語言。在這種情況下,本文運用形態(tài)學研究方法,著重討論了結構原型的演化與變形策略,明確了結構設計在建造整體目標中的重要位置,修正了長期以來建筑先入為主、結構被動配合的思維定勢,實現(xiàn)了建筑形態(tài)與結構形態(tài)的有機整合,將改善既有結構原型自身弱點與拓展建筑形態(tài)多樣性并舉,建立建筑與結構兩專業(yè)的溝通機制,有利于改變當今建筑與結構兩專業(yè)在實踐與研究領域的二分狀態(tài)。本文首先從形態(tài)學視角明確了建筑形態(tài)與結構形態(tài)的含義,并對兩者的眾多關聯(lián)性類型給予價值判斷,進而通過對框架結構的演化歷程的解析,從中歸納出結構原型的更迭機制。在此基礎上,以當代應用最廣范的多米諾體系為例,通過對諸多結構形態(tài)與建筑形態(tài)彼此合一并相互觸發(fā)的案例進行解析與分類研究,從材料置換、幾何變形和力流重構三方面闡述了通過結構原型的變形實現(xiàn)建筑與結構形態(tài)有機整合的設計方法。
[Abstract]:Since the emergence of specialized division of labor between architecture and civil engineering, architectural engineering design usually shows a linear thinking and one-way flow characteristics of first construction and later structure. The misunderstanding and prejudice caused by the lack of structural knowledge has become the constraint and limitation of architectural shape shaping. At the same time, the lack of basic judgment of objective structural rules will lead to a huge waste of structural resources. Architecture and structure are not without the desire to interact, but there is a lack of a common language to communicate. In this case, this paper mainly discusses the evolution and deformation strategy of the structure prototype by means of morphological research, clarifies the important position of the structure design in the whole construction goal, and corrects the long term preconceived construction. The thinking pattern of passive coordination of structure realizes the organic integration of architectural form and structural form, improves the weakness of the existing structural prototype and expands the diversity of architectural form, and establishes the communication mechanism between architecture and structure. It is helpful to change the dichotomy of architecture and structure in the field of practice and research. In this paper, the meaning of architectural form and structural form is clarified from the perspective of morphology, and the value judgment of many related types is given, and then the evolution of frame structure is analyzed. The mechanism of structural archetype change is concluded. On this basis, taking the domino system with the most extensive application in modern times as an example, through analyzing and classifying many cases in which the structural and architectural forms are one another and triggering each other, the replacement of materials is carried out. Geometric deformation and force-flow reconstruction are introduced to realize the organic integration of architecture and structure form through the deformation of structural prototype.
【學位授予單位】：東南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：TU201

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 李德鋒;;淺談建筑形態(tài)學對建筑設計的啟示[J];山西建筑;2010年28期

2 林莆程;;建筑形態(tài)學與結構主義對建筑設計的啟示[J];建材世界;2012年01期

3 韋s，

本文編號：2300336