本文選題：博物館 + 建筑設(shè)計��； 參考：《魯迅美術(shù)學(xué)院》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國作為一個歷史悠久,有著無數(shù)歷史文明與遺跡的東方古國,現(xiàn)在很多各種夸張的怪異的建筑大行其道,中國正在逐漸成為世界建筑實驗工地,這里的很多建筑無疑是對歷史文脈的破壞與割裂。所以傳統(tǒng)與當(dāng)代如何契合的話題引起了我的關(guān)注與思考,我覺得這雖然是一個古老的命題,是人類的永恒命題,古以有之,但筆墨當(dāng)隨時代,不同的時代當(dāng)有不同的發(fā)音,是永遠(yuǎn)無法逃避與擺脫的,如何將舊有的文化載體或歷史文化性建筑改造成新館。這一普遍命題已經(jīng)逐漸變成一個重要的設(shè)計文化現(xiàn)象,越來越值得當(dāng)下的設(shè)計師們?nèi)ニ伎寂c探索。對舊有歷史文化的傳承與保護(hù),對歷史文脈的認(rèn)可與尊重應(yīng)當(dāng)是新時代每一位“社會工程師”肩膀上的責(zé)任。我想通過這篇論文能夠探討出一條符合中國國情,行之有效的設(shè)計方法來解決現(xiàn)下中國所面臨的建設(shè)問題國內(nèi)正處與迷茫與實驗化的時期,這一時期也是迷茫的探索時期。同樣這一時期也包容并序的多元化的。國外等發(fā)達(dá)國家早已度過了迷茫與探索期,根據(jù)各個國家的不同國情早以找到一種行之有效的解決方案,其中大多數(shù)采用的都是提煉建筑內(nèi)在精神內(nèi)涵一致法,所以著眼于當(dāng)下的中國“提煉建筑內(nèi)在精神內(nèi)涵一致法”無疑是較為理智可行的,且具有一定深遠(yuǎn)意義的方法論。因為他符合中國的國情,同樣也經(jīng)歷了一定的歷史的檢驗。我相信只要堅持這樣的方法去解決中國當(dāng)下設(shè)計建設(shè)的一些問題,必將會收到行之有效的解決
[Abstract]:China, as an ancient oriental country with a long history and numerous historical civilizations and relics, now has a lot of exaggerated and strange buildings, and China is gradually becoming a world building experimental site. There is no doubt that many of the buildings here are the destruction and division of the historical context. So the topic of how tradition and contemporary fit has aroused my concern and thinking. Although this is an ancient proposition, it is the eternal proposition of mankind, and there is it in ancient times, but with the times, different times should have different sounds. Can never escape and get rid of, how to transform the old cultural carrier or historical cultural building into a new museum. This universal proposition has gradually become an important phenomenon of design culture, which is more and more worthy of designers to think and explore. To inherit and protect the old history and culture and to recognize and respect the historical context should be the responsibility of every "social engineer" in the new era. Through this paper, I would like to explore an effective design method to solve the construction problems that China is faced with. This period is also a period of confusion and experimentation. The same period is also inclusive and sequential diversity. Developed countries, such as foreign countries, have already passed the period of confusion and exploration. According to the different national conditions of each country, they have found an effective solution, most of which are based on the method of refining the inner spiritual connotation of the building. Therefore, it is reasonable and feasible to focus on the present Chinese methodology of refining the inner spiritual connotation of architecture. Because he is in line with China's national conditions, but also experienced a certain historical test. I believe that as long as we stick to such a method to solve some of the problems in China's current design and construction, we will certainly receive an effective solution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：魯迅美術(shù)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：TU242.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 詹陽烈;;世博中的綠色[J];中國核工業(yè);2010年05期

2 ;漢諾威展團(tuán)媒體之旅中國行[J];電氣制造;2012年04期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條

1 ;激情盛會 和諧亞洲[N];人民日報;2010年

2 ;激情盛會 和諧亞洲[N];人民日報海外版;2010年

3 本報高級編輯 陳昭;2008,注定屬于中國[N];人民日報海外版;2008年

4 文刀;出國游的鏡子照出了什么[N];蘇州日報;2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 黃永澤;試論博物館設(shè)計中“傳統(tǒng)”與“當(dāng)代”的契合[D];魯迅美術(shù)學(xué)院;2015年

，

本文編號：1816223