本文關(guān)鍵詞： 城鄉(xiāng)一體化 發(fā)展績效 空間規(guī)劃 策略 平頂山市　出處：《西安建筑科技大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：城市和鄉(xiāng)村的關(guān)系問題一直是影響我國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展,社會穩(wěn)定的重大問題,城鄉(xiāng)一體化作為解決城鄉(xiāng)關(guān)系的一種方式,對于消除我國城鄉(xiāng)經(jīng)濟之間存在的二元體制矛盾,推動城鄉(xiāng)經(jīng)濟快速發(fā)展,加快城鄉(xiāng)之間資源、技術(shù)、資本等要素的流動,促進農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟的快速發(fā)展,推動社會主義農(nóng)村建設(shè)有著積極的意義。而城鄉(xiāng)一體化問題本身就是一個涉及社會學、人類學、經(jīng)濟學、地理學、城鄉(xiāng)規(guī)劃學等學科知識的復(fù)雜問題,同時受到城鄉(xiāng)經(jīng)濟、社會、人口、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施等諸多因素的影響。因此,對城鄉(xiāng)一體化發(fā)展績效的評價研究有著重要的理論意義和實踐意義。本文從理論研究入手,通過對城鄉(xiāng)一體化相關(guān)理論和發(fā)展績效相關(guān)理論的梳理,總結(jié)了城鄉(xiāng)一體化發(fā)展績效的基本內(nèi)涵,并通過對發(fā)展績效評價體系和評價方法的研究,為城鄉(xiāng)一體化發(fā)展績效指標體系的構(gòu)建和評價方法的選擇提供了理論基礎(chǔ)。在實證分析中,以平頂山地區(qū)為研究對象,首先分別從城鄉(xiāng)產(chǎn)業(yè)空間、城鄉(xiāng)人口空間、市域城鎮(zhèn)等級三個方面入手,定性分析了平頂山地區(qū)城鄉(xiāng)一體化空間發(fā)展方面的現(xiàn)狀問題。其次,按照目標導向的思路,從城鄉(xiāng)一體化質(zhì)量績效、城鄉(xiāng)一體化效率績效、城鄉(xiāng)一體化結(jié)構(gòu)績效、城鄉(xiāng)一體化潛力績效四個方面,構(gòu)建了城鄉(xiāng)一體化發(fā)展績效評價指標體系,并通過建立數(shù)學評價模型,選用因子分析法與熵值法相結(jié)合的方法,對平頂山地區(qū)的城鄉(xiāng)一體化發(fā)展績效進行了綜合評價,并通過聚類分析和空間分析方法對評價結(jié)果進行了分析。最后,在對各縣市發(fā)展績效評價結(jié)果分析的基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)出了平頂山地區(qū)城鄉(xiāng)一體化空間發(fā)展特點,提出了空間發(fā)展的三種模式,并分別從城鄉(xiāng)經(jīng)濟空間一體化、城鄉(xiāng)社會空間一體化、城鄉(xiāng)城鎮(zhèn)空間一體化、城鄉(xiāng)生態(tài)空間一體化四個方面,提出了關(guān)于平頂山市域城鄉(xiāng)一體化空間規(guī)劃策略。
[Abstract]:The relationship between cities and villages has always been a major problem affecting the economic development and social stability of our country. As a way to solve the relationship between urban and rural areas, the integration of urban and rural areas has contributed to the elimination of the dual system contradictions between urban and rural economies in China. To promote the rapid development of urban and rural economies, accelerate the flow of resources, technology, capital and other elements between urban and rural areas, and promote the rapid development of rural economies, Promoting socialist rural construction is of positive significance. The problem of urban-rural integration is itself a complex problem involving knowledge of sociology, anthropology, economics, geography, urban and rural planning, and so on. At the same time, it is also subject to the urban and rural economy. Therefore, the evaluation of the development performance of urban and rural integration has important theoretical and practical significance. By combing the theories of urban-rural integration and development performance, this paper summarizes the basic connotation of urban-rural integration development performance, and studies the evaluation system and methods of development performance. It provides a theoretical basis for the construction of performance index system and the selection of evaluation methods for urban-rural integration development. In the empirical analysis, Pingdingshan region is taken as the research object, first of all, from the urban and rural industrial space, urban and rural population space, urban and rural population space. Starting with three aspects of urban and rural grade, this paper qualitatively analyzes the present situation of spatial development of urban and rural integration in Pingdingshan area. Secondly, according to the goal-oriented thinking, it analyzes the quality performance of urban-rural integration and the efficiency performance of urban-rural integration. This paper constructs the evaluation index system of the development performance of urban-rural integration in four aspects: the structural performance of urban-rural integration and the potential performance of urban-rural integration. Through the establishment of mathematical evaluation model, the method of combining factor analysis with entropy method is selected. This paper makes a comprehensive evaluation of the development performance of urban and rural integration in Pingdingshan area, and analyzes the evaluation results by cluster analysis and spatial analysis. Finally, on the basis of the analysis of the evaluation results of the development performance of each county and city, This paper summarizes the characteristics of the spatial development of urban and rural integration in Pingdingshan area, and puts forward three models of spatial development, including urban and rural economic spatial integration, urban-rural social spatial integration, urban-rural urban spatial integration, and urban and rural spatial integration. Four aspects of urban and rural ecological spatial integration are put forward, and the spatial planning strategy of urban and rural integration in Pingdingshan is put forward.
【學位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：TU984

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉偉;張士運;孫久文;;我國四個直轄市城鄉(xiāng)一體化進程比較與評價[J];北京社會科學;2010年04期

2 劉晨陽,周彤及,傅鴻源;重慶都市區(qū)城鄉(xiāng)一體化發(fā)展模式分析[J];長江流域資源與環(huán)境;2005年06期

3 張新亞;楊忠偉;袁中金;;蘇州市城鄉(xiāng)一體化測評指標體系研究[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2012年05期

4 許為民;李穩(wěn)博;;從經(jīng)典學術(shù)論文的視角分析績效內(nèi)涵研究[J];東華大學學報(社會科學版);2009年04期

5 祝艷;;發(fā)達國家城鄉(xiāng)一體化的經(jīng)驗與啟示[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè);2012年01期

6 洪銀興 ,陳雯;城鄉(xiāng)一體化的科學內(nèi)涵[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2003年55期

7 賈彩彥;;近代美國城市化進程中城市土地管理制度的初步構(gòu)建[J];蘭州學刊;2011年05期

8 張季風;戰(zhàn)后日本農(nóng)村剩余勞動力轉(zhuǎn)移及其特點[J];日本學刊;2003年02期

9 董志強;;煙臺城鄉(xiāng)一體化評價系統(tǒng)研究[J];煙臺職業(yè)學院學報;2011年01期

10 厲以寧;;論城鄉(xiāng)一體化[J];中國流通經(jīng)濟;2010年11期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 江敦濤;山東半島城鄉(xiāng)一體化發(fā)展模式研究[D];中國海洋大學;2011年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 倪德嶺;基于因子分析法的上市公司業(yè)績評價模型[D];石河子大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1514632