【摘要】：2014年2月26日習(xí)近平總書記把實現(xiàn)京津冀協(xié)同發(fā)展作為一個重大國家戰(zhàn)略”;2017年4月1日中央在河北省設(shè)立雄安新區(qū)。在這樣的大背景下,京津冀金融一體化發(fā)展正經(jīng)歷著從量變到質(zhì)變的過程。本文旨在通過對京津冀地區(qū)金融資源配置效率的研究有效解釋京津冀區(qū)域金融發(fā)展“二元”特征,通過提高配置效率引導(dǎo)金融資源合理配置,實現(xiàn)京津冀金融一體化發(fā)展。本文首先根據(jù)金融資源定義,從京津冀整體層面和省際層面分析其2000-2014年的金融資源分布現(xiàn)狀。其次,運用三階段DEA和超效率DEA法測算包括北京、天津、河北地區(qū)的我國東部12個省(市)2014年金融資源配置效率。再次,從實證分析從宏觀和微觀層面出發(fā),對京津冀地區(qū)的金融資源配置效率區(qū)域差異的原因進行定性和定量分析。最后,根據(jù)宏觀層面和微觀層面原因,在實證分析結(jié)果的基礎(chǔ)上提出提高京津冀地區(qū)金融資源配置效率的政策建議。研究結(jié)果表明:第一,不考慮外部環(huán)境等因素的條件下,2014年我國東部12省(市)的效率幾乎均達(dá)不到1,其中僅天津和海南處于有效前沿面上。對于京津冀地區(qū)而言,它們之間的金融資源配置效率差異較大,尤其是北京、河北的效率值較低。第二,外界環(huán)境因素、隨機誤差和內(nèi)部管理等因素對京津冀地區(qū)的金融資源配置效率產(chǎn)生較大影響。第三,京津冀等東部地區(qū)的效率在調(diào)整后發(fā)生較大變化。河北地區(qū)的效率明顯低于北京、天津。第四,在五個東部地區(qū)處于金融生產(chǎn)前沿面中,天津超效率為1.6583排名第一,北京為1.0170排名第五。最后,本文根據(jù)實證的結(jié)論和京津冀地區(qū)金融資源配置效率區(qū)域差異的原因提出如下相應(yīng)的政策建議:縮小區(qū)域經(jīng)濟發(fā)展差距;減少地方政府對金融過度干預(yù);創(chuàng)造良好的金融生態(tài)環(huán)境;建立多層次資本市場體系;提高金融資源使用效率、貸款投資生產(chǎn)效率。
[Abstract]:On February 26, 2014, General Secretary Xi Jinping made the coordinated development of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei a major national strategy. On April 1, 2017, the central government established the Xiong'an New District in Hebei Province. Against this background, the financial integration of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei is undergoing a process from quantitative change to qualitative change. The purpose of this paper is to effectively explain the "dualistic" characteristics of financial development in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region through the study of the efficiency of financial resources allocation in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, and to guide the rational allocation of financial resources through improving the allocation efficiency, and to realize the development of financial integration between Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. Firstly, according to the definition of financial resources, this paper analyzes the distribution of financial resources in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei from the overall level and the provincial level from 2000 to 2014. Secondly, using three-stage DEA and super-efficiency DEA method, the efficiency of financial resource allocation in 12 eastern provinces (cities) including Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei is estimated in 2014. Thirdly, from the macro and micro level, the reasons for the regional differences in the allocation efficiency of financial resources in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region are analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Finally, based on the results of empirical analysis, the author puts forward some policy suggestions to improve the efficiency of financial resources allocation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. The results show that: first, the efficiency of the 12 provinces (cities) in eastern China in 2014 is almost less than 1, only Tianjin and Hainan are in the effective frontier without taking into account the external environment and other factors. For the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, there are great differences in the efficiency of financial resources allocation, especially in Beijing and Hebei. Secondly, external environmental factors, random errors and internal management have a great impact on the allocation efficiency of financial resources in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Third, the efficiency of Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei and other eastern areas has changed greatly after the adjustment. The efficiency of Hebei is obviously lower than that of Beijing and Tianjin. Fourth, among the five eastern regions at the forefront of financial production, Tianjin ranked first at 1.6583 and Beijing fifth at 1.0170. Finally, based on the empirical conclusions and the reasons for the regional differences in the allocation efficiency of financial resources in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, this paper puts forward the following corresponding policy recommendations: narrowing the gap in regional economic development; reducing the excessive intervention of local governments in finance; Create a good financial ecological environment, establish a multi-level capital market system, improve the efficiency of the use of financial resources, loan investment production efficiency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F832.7;F127

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李紅梅;;基于DEA方法下的我國金融資源配置效率研究[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2012年04期

2 崔建軍;;中國區(qū)域金融資源配置效率分析——金融視角下的“一個中國,四個世界”[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟科學(xué);2012年02期

3 吳濤;李宏瑾;;我國各地區(qū)金融資源配置效率及其與金融發(fā)展的關(guān)系[J];南方金融;2011年12期

4 盧穎;白欽先;;中國金融資源地區(qū)分布中政府權(quán)力影響[J];廣東金融學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年04期

5 陳凱笛;龔誼;;基于金融資源區(qū)域分布的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟差異實證研究[J];經(jīng)濟研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年08期

6 中國人民銀行鄭州中心支行課題組;杜迎偉;;我國金融資源區(qū)域分布不平衡的機理分析及政策建議[J];金融理論與實踐;2007年09期

7 周國富;胡慧敏;;金融效率評價指標(biāo)體系研究[J];金融理論與實踐;2007年08期

8 王紀(jì)全;張曉燕;劉全勝;;中國金融資源的地區(qū)分布及其對區(qū)域經(jīng)濟增長的影響[J];金融研究;2007年06期

9 任亞軍;;區(qū)域金融資源配置差異性研究[J];上海金融;2007年03期

10 劉飛;;基于DEA的區(qū)域金融效率評價研究[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2007年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 盧穎;中國金融資源地區(qū)分布差異性研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2009年

2 何風(fēng)雋;中國轉(zhuǎn)型經(jīng)濟中的金融資源配置研究[D];西北大學(xué);2005年

3 王振山;金融效率論——金融資源優(yōu)化配置的理論與實踐[D];東北財經(jīng)大學(xué);1999年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 常帥;中國地區(qū)金融資源配置效率評價及其影響因素的實證分析[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

2 袁科;港深穗金融資源配置效率實證研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2008年

3 胡慧敏;我國金融效率評價指標(biāo)體系及影響因素分析[D];天津財經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

4 王琳;中部崛起的金融資源配置效率研究[D];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

5 李文龍;M_2/GDP比值高：金融資源配置效率低——一種理論詮釋[D];暨南大學(xué);2002年

，

本文編號：2269835